User talk:Inspector123

Aeroflot terminated destinations
Hi Lawrence, terminated destinations list is not even part of WikiProject Aviation/Airline destination lists, however since its been created it should remain but in a manner that does not use too much space nor give unecessary details or compete/clash with the main airline destination article.

The current listing for Aeroflot terminated destinations is doing all of the above, what harm if its format is simplified and yet serves the purpose? the main aim is to just have previous destinations in there and not make it a formal "pomp and show" thing like the main destinations article, with countries and airports information.(inspector 16:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC))
 * Just so I'm sure, are you talking about this? • Lawrence Cohen  17:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes, thats the list, hope you will restore it and allow it to remain, I mean the changes I had made earlier. (inspector 17:23, 24 September 2007 (UTC))

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Th tajikairnewtitle.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Th tajikairnewtitle.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:46, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Aero- asia new logo.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Aero- asia new logo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nepal airlines new title.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Nepal airlines new title.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

April 2008
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming an article is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. I have redirected Euro cargo air to Euro Cargo Air. ukexpat (talk) 19:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks I was not aware as to how to change it.(inspector 18:34, 12 April 2008 (UTC))

Hey
Hey, Inspector123, i am encourage you to handle the matter yourself if you can, you just need to link to evidence in edit summary. If you can handle it, surely it is a benefit for you, no need to depend me so much. I can still assist you if you want. --Aleen f 1  08:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, Inspector123, i am wrong in the past, it is agree in WikiProject_Aviation/Style_guide that a standalone article can be created, so you just need to move inside there and fix the format to prefer one. --Aleen f 1  08:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Well done, Inspector123, i saw what you did. But can you login and do it? because you may in sock, i am advice you to do that. And you didn't let them know that flags is prohibited, simply just link to the consensus in user talk page. If there refuse to read, just let them, i probably same as you, in Turkish Airlines destinations, now i don't want to feed them. Good luck next time. :) --Aleen f 1  09:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Apologise
Hi, Inspector123, apologise i didn't reply your message. I have internet problems and cannot working on Wikipedia. Sorry about that. Any help still can call me. Thanks! --Aleen f 1  08:04, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, Inspector123, i saw someone already warned him about his "nonsense" reversion through his talk page. The thing deal. More you can forward to me. Thanks --Aleen f 1  07:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, will do if necessary.inspector 17:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Air India Express Flight 812
Re your recent change to the table, I've raised this issue at the article's talk page. I've not reverted your edit, and in return I ask that you don't change the Afriqiyah accident article which I mentioned in my comments. Mjroots (talk) 11:40, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * As I said, I've raised the issue at talk:Air India Express Flight 812. If you can point me to policy that backs up what you say, please do so and I'll change the Afriqiyah accident article myself.
 * BTW, your signature on my talk page did not contain a link to either your user page or your talk page. A signature must link to one or the other at minimum. See WP:SIGLINK for details. Please amend your signature so that it conforms with the policy. Mjroots (talk) 11:52, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * How have you sent me message then? I dont know how to amend signature, I have been posting since over a year with this and none has had an issue until now.inspector 11:56, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I got to your talk page via a page that lists changes to articles I'm interested in.
 * To change your signature, click on the "Preferences" tab from your user page, then untick the box where it says "Sign my name using the provided wikitext", then click "save" and your signature should return to the default one like mine. Mjroots (talk) 12:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok done.inspector (talk) 18:49, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Why am I blocked from editing?
Hi, Inspector123. Thank you, i'm fine. You not being blocked. Try to logout and login again. Feed back to me. Thank you. --Aleen f 1  15:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Try to clear the cache. See Bypass your cache to get which browser you use and make it. You can make a feedback to me. Thank you. --Aleen f 1  05:04, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Working fine right now without having done anything, lets see if it gives problem later on.inspector (talk) 05:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

offensive note at PIA disambiguation section
Well, i'm not sure what is going on. I cannot make it without proper knowledge. --Aleen f 1  11:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Afleen, it seems to have been resolved on its own.inspector (talk) 08:21, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Pakistan International Airlines destinations. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. I don't mean this as a nasty warning, but it would help vandal-patrol if you could remember to supply edit summaries - you can even set a flag in your Preferences, to remind you - thanks. Trafford09 (talk) 20:37, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Please note that each of your recent avatars are at most one revert away from immediate blocks (there is a three-revert rule, in case you're unfamiliar with Wikipedia editing policy). Please refrain from further reverts, because failure to do so will result in an automatic block. Also, note that reverts made from all avatars collectively count towards your totals. Come to think of it, if you add them all up, you have likely surpassed the 3 revert total by some margin. Thanks, Jasepl (talk) 15:31, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Disruptive editor
I don't know why you're bugging me about this. I'm not an administrator. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 17:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Edit Summaries
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Air India destinations. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 13:53, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Please also ensure that you provide valid sourced, where required, when making edits. As you are very well aware, citing valid sources is a basic requirement of the Aviation project and of Wikipedia in general. Failure to provide a valid source often results in edits being reverted. Jasepl (talk) 14:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note that continuing to revert / edit without cause, or without providing appropriate sources / comments will still result in your edits being invalidated. Jasepl (talk) 03:43, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * It seems you are bent on continuing to vandalise (note that edits that do not follow required procedure still amount to vandalism, regardless of whether or not the editor or anyone else believed the information added to be correct). Also, as explained previously, edits made by all your avatars, including from IPs, count towards your total, which you have surpassed by quite some margin. Further vandalism will revert in a block.You have been warned more times, by more editors, than is ordinarily done. Jasepl (talk) 09:12, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note that I have reverted your most recent edit to Air India destinations. This is because no source was provided as a basis for removing Darwin from the destination list. "Apparently" does not qualify as a valid source. In any event, are technical stops destinations (Tbilisi) or not (Darwin)? jasepl (talk) 08:59, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry
Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's Sockpuppetry Policy, which strongly recommends creating a user name and always using that single user name to edit. It also lays out what constitutes sockpuppetry; all your different avatars and IP and collective behaviour meet and exceed said criteria. Jasepl (talk) 05:50, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Unacceptable behaviour (additional notice)
Here is a summary of your behaviours that have caused problems with several editors on Wikipedia:

1. Not editing using your registered user ID
 * | You have an existing user ID, which you | use sporadically, as and when you feel like it. You also self-admittedly edit using any of several hundred IPs (| more than 500 at last count). Your reasons for not using a single ID have ranged from “I don’t want to pretend to be an administrator” to “I forget” to “I’m too lazy to log in”. None of these are acceptable reasons, per Wikipedia policy on user IDs. You have been | made aware of all of this, on numerous occasions, yet choose to ignore it.

2. Block evasion
 * To add to that, | your user ID as well as several of your IPs have been blocked on numerous occasions, for a laundry list of infractions, the most common of which include edit warring, | violating 3RR, refusing to comply with editing guidelines and using unacceptably abusive language. This amounts to | sockpuppetry. Marry the two together and it is clear to see that the reason for your editing practice is to escape accountability and to evade blocks. Note that blocks are directed towards an editor, regardless of the ID/IP the editor may use.

3. Not following editing guidelines
 * You | refuse to follow editing guidelines, as if they don’t apply to you and you’re free to do what you feel like. That is not the case. There is a set of prescribed formats and procedures and they need to be followed by everyone.

4. Using abusive language and personal attacks
 * This is absolutely not allowed, under any circumstances, no matter how justified your stand or how great your frustration. This includes your history of swearing at others in what | I presume is Pakistani (it doesn’t matter what language you use, it is still a gross violation of acceptability and will not be tolerated).

In that light, here’s yet another refresher on what you already know:

A. Edit using one and only one ID
 * An occasional edit using an anonymous IP is one thing. But with many thousand edits, using several hundred IPs, continuing to edit under an IP (which you have done even today), will be considered block evasion, and the prescribed action will be taken. You have been advised and warned regarding this as recently as a couple of days ago, by more than one editor and administrator.

B. Familiarise yourself with editing guidelines
 * This includes overall Wikipedia policy, as well as established standards and procedures governing individual projects. If you still don’t know where these are available, ask anyone.

C. Learn to work with others
 * If you don’t like the way something is done, then bring it up for discussion at the appropriate forum, let other contributors weigh in, get general consensus, and then feel free to go ahead and make the change. You are not free, however, to do what you feel like in the manner of your preference, for no good reason. Wikipedia is not 17th century France and you are not Louis XIV.

D. Provide sources and edit comments where required
 * As already explained | so many times, these are necessary. And no, | personal blogs, “because”, “everyone knows” and “eff off” are NOT valid sources.

E. Get yourself a lesson in basic manners.
 * Again, | swearing, abusiveness, personal attacks and so forth are NOT acceptable and will NOT be tolerated.

Note that there is no denying that you are well aware of each of your many infractions, and that you are familiar with editing guidelines and acceptable behavioural norms. Note also that you have been reminded of these more times than anyone can count.

Given all of this, it is my opinion that the community has been more patient with you and provided you with more give than can be expected and is done with most others.

I am unable to see why any disciplinary action shouldn’t be taken against you, looking at your long, colourful chargesheet (for lack of a better word) and your unwavering determination to (abusively) do what you want.

I will continue to add to this as is appropriate. jasepl (talk) 05:36, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Investor123, while Jasepl has a few points here (i.e. you need to make sure that you are logged in all the time), there are many other points in this laundry list that are simply frivolous, in particular given the many infractions and inacceptable behaviour of Jasepl himself. So do not disregard Jasepl's message in complete, even if the intent of the message is rather to intimidate and bully you. For the future, make sure that you are always logged-in and you should also start using the talk page of articles to discuss any controversial changes. The same of course also applies to Jasepl, who should also apologize for his racists attacks. Stepopen (talk) 06:29, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Stepopen, I hope more people can see through this chap and as for his rant against me I give two f's about it, he can go on and on, keep adding to the list I wont even bother reading any messages coming to my username hence forth, as it is I didnt read oe than two lines of whatever it is he has posted.inspector (talk) 13:50, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Euro Cargo Air for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Euro Cargo Air, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Euro Cargo Air until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 11:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for informing me, I myself think that it should be deleted, so please go ahead.inspector (talk) 13:26, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Not logging in
Please use your registered user ID when making edits, in adherence with WP:ACCOUNT. Sustained failure to do so - eg: | this edit - is subject to action prescribed at WP:Sock as has been explained a number of times. jasepl (talk) 17:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The user said that they have abandoned and "forfeited" this account due to you following and harassing them. Have not looked into this but sounds like a good time to disengage. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 00:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Merging IC destination list into AI destination list
I have notice that you have merged IC's destionations into AI's destinations. Remember the merger is complete but would be effective 27 February and I don't know how you ended up changing so soon. &mdash; Abhishek Talk to me 01:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * And so???inspector (talk) 18:52, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Air India Regional
Please do not merge the fleet of Air India Regional into Air India fleet. CD remains a separate airline and is now a subsidiary of AI, hence has an AI code too through code share. But CD still has an AOC of its own. Thanks, &mdash; Abhishek Talk to me 02:44, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Please explain yourself
In this edit, your edit summary said "do not list airlines that dont operate freighter aircraft in this section" yet one of the airlines you removed is Air Hong Kong, which is an all cargo airline with main hub in this airport. Such edit is considered reckless and edit summary is considered to be highly misleading because I found many airlines you removed have cargo operations as stated in each of their company's website. If you continued to engage in this behaviour, you may find yourself blocked indefinitely. OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I have removed only those airlines that do not operate dedicted freighter aircrfat for their crgo opertions, crgo being flown in underbelly of pssenger ircrft by their freight divisiion should not be listed in the section. HKG irlines being removed ws mistke, hving keybord issues therefore some letters missing. signed inspector123
 * Again, you removed airlines that have cargo planes (such as Shenzhen Donghai Airlines, which operates 4 B737-300F, and Cargo Garuda Indonesia, which the entire fleet are consisted of cargo planes) OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:05, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * There is no Cargo Garuda Indonesia, even if it exists they dont have planes now, shenshen donghai is still listed in HKG.signed inspector123
 * Are you kidding me? Do you even bother to click on this link to Cargo Garuda Indonesia's article page to see its fleet? OhanaUnitedTalk page 03:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * its incorrect article, there is no such fleet. signed inspector123

Flydubai destinations
I would strongly recommend you to go through the project guidelines at WP:AVIATION, WP:AIRPORT, WP:AIRLINE. Your reverts simply show your lack of awareness of these guidelines. If you do not stop reverting, I'll have to report you. &mdash; Abhishek Talk to me 17:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Kindly stop the pedntic behviour like youre suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder, wiki only disllows month or month/yer combo, here distinct tenttive dte/month/yer is given, wether it hppens or not is irrelevnt, key bord issues therefore typos. signed inspector123
 * Go through clause 1 of WP:BALL. You won't be able to understand it unless you're educated. &mdash; Abhishek  Talk to me 02:38, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I never knew wiki hd such stupid thing s crystl bll, wht  fucked up plce but then look t the retrds who they ppoint to look out, ech one suffering from OCD.

Proposed deletion of Aer Lingus Cargo destinations
FYI an article that has undergone a deletion discussion like Aer Lingus Cargo destinations is permanently ineligible for proposed deletion. I had removed the prod tag you placed on the article; however, on a closer look at the situation, I reverted myself in accordance with ignore all rules because those deletion discussions involved this article bundled with 170+ other articles, and the rationale in those discussions had nothing to do with your deletion rationale for this article. I have no prejudice against any other editor contesting deletion on other grounds.

Also when proposing an article for deletion, it is not necessary to add a tag to the talk page; a tag only needs to be added to the top of the article. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 16:08, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Biman Bangladesh Airlines
Regarding the addition of the 744 to the fleet table, I already made a search throughout the web, not only Google, finding nothing so far. I invite you to add a reference for yourself if you have one. With all due respect, I honestly don't expect a non-IP user as you are acting the way you do, i.e. reverting and maintaining unverifiable contents within an article. Please let me know what you think.--Jetstreamer (talk) 21:04, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

In use template
Can you please do not edit articles while the “In use” template is displayed? You did so in KLM destinations. Thanks.--Jetstreamer (talk) 10:57, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I dont know what it means? inspector (talk) 11:21, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It politely requests other editors not to edit the article until the message gets undisplayed again. You can see how it (simply) works here.--Jetstreamer (talk) 22:09, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent activity at Turkish Airlines destinations
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Turkish Airlines destinations, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Jetstreamer (talk) 15:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry but I found it ugly and unecessay, it will be discussed at wikiproject airlines.inspector (talk) 16:01, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Removal of maintenance templates
Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Air Canada destinations, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. I'm referring to this edit.--Jetstreamer (talk) 04:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Comp dude 123 00:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eaglexpress


A tag has been placed on Eaglexpress requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. noq (talk) 11:36, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about, its a stub on a new airline and is to be built up, I have created many such articles in the past based on templates of similar articles and there has never been an issue infact its perfectly inline with other such articles of new airlines created according to Wiki Project: Airlines and its associated group of editors, kindly go discuss this with all those involved at WPA on the talk page wikipedia talk:wikiproject airlines. inspector (talk) 13:24, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Eaglexpress for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eaglexpress is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Eaglexpress until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 14:44, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Eaglexpress
Hi, just thought i would let you know that Eaglexpress has been listed for deletion. I have already listed my objections. Thanks --JetBlast (talk) 14:57, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Join us at FB
Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.

Join us:
 * Group: Pakistani Wikipedians
 * Page: Pakistani Wikipedians

And then sign my guestbook for memories.

Regards: --  Captain Wikipedia!     ( T - C  - <font color=Green>G  ) 13:08, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SpiceJet destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sharjah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Abu Dhabi International Airport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Sharjah


 * Etihad Airways destinations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Hahn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Uzbekistan Airways destinations
Regarding this edit, Urumqi is not included in the source you provided.--Jetstreamer Talk 15:52, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * See here. inspector (talk) 21:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * This timetable is effective – . How can you ensure it's already in force? March has just started.--Jetstreamer Talk 01:23, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * No doubts at all. Read this. The summer timetable you mention comes into force in late March.--Jetstreamer Talk 01:27, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Iraqi Airways to Malmo
The airline's official website does not list Malmo as bookable destination. The source provided is that Malmo serves as a stop for flights from Baghdad to London. You need to provide a source saying that the airline served it a few years back. 68.119.73.36 (talk) 02:16, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Malmo, Stockholm and Frankfurt as well as some current Middle East routes were listed with schedules in Iraqi Airways UK website and the source provided in wiki article as reference, they have since removed that info, also you can make an effort and google stuff yourself instead of depending on others to do that, isn't that responsible editing? inspector (talk) 16:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Air Arabia destinations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Lar


 * Mashhad International Airport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Sharjah

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=573386300 your edit] to Dubai World Central - Al Maktoum International Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:57, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Airport|Melbourne]], Singapore, Sydney only operating return leg, flights originate at  Dubai-International

Jat Airways
Hello. The source you used in edit is not working. It is the same you used at Jat Airways destinations. Furthermore, I've reverted edit as unsourced.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 22:18, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I had linked entire booking page off Jat website showing BEG-SAW service, in any case SAW is confirmed and validated officially from website, thanks. inspector (talk) 22:39, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Abu Dhabi International Airport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Muscat and Sharjah


 * List of Boeing 747 operators (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Rolls Royce

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan
<div style="background-image: linear-gradient(to right, #F5F5DC, #A9BA9D); border:1px solid #D1E231; border-radius: 25px; padding: 20px; margin: 0px; box-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em rgba(0,0,0,0.5);">

'''Hi !

Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.

Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.

Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan

Pakistani Cultural Heritage - Edit Drive
Hi !

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July. Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.

You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC) You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan

Delhi Airport
Inspector how to edit a protected page?? Please tell me on my page. Thank U... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Urrranonymous (talk • contribs) 16:04, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abu Dhabi International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sharjah. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Qatar Airways destinations ‎
I have reverted your edit again. You need to provide a source confirming the service, given that the start date provided is in last January and we are now in February. The route map used as a reference does not include the destination.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 16:12, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Your behaviour is just unacceptable. You keep reverting me without even bothering to leave and explanatory edit summary . Have you heard about warring?--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 18:07, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Inspector123, on the Qatar Airways destinations the reference provided for the Basel flight path doesnt appear to be readily available on the website the reference is pointing to. Could you adivse if the reference should point to another location or if there appears to be an issue with the page at present. It does appear to be unreferenced and you appear to be at risk of entering an edit war over an unreferenced airline destination. Could you advise? Amortias (T)(C) 19:38, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shaheen Air, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shaikh Zayed International Airport. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mihin Lanka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Etihad Airways destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Juan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Personal insults
WARNING This and this (which you insist on restoring) both comprise direct personal attacks on another editor. You have already been warned once about this. If you continue to violate WP:NPA you may be reported and blocked from editing Wikipedia. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 09:34, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Relying on Inside News
Recently you have added on Pakistan International Airlines is going to induct 787-9 and you mentioned that it was from inside news. If not wrong, you chose to be EXTENDED CONFIRMED USER and then add things over here as from inside news. I was glad to see this all. Ever heard of giving reference when adding info on Wikipedia?

BTW that so-called inside news was also revealed to me but didn't added on PIA's page as I couldn't confirm it from any news or Boeings' order page. Abdulrafey97 (talk) 16:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Inspector123 Still waiting for your response!

Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abu Dhabi International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muscat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Explaination required of Saudi Arabian Airlines recent edit
Hi Inspector123 you're having a good day.

According to Wikipedia, Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. Information which is based on rumors or inside News must not be added on Wikipedia. Recently you made some changes in fleet of Saudi Arabian Airlines. I've already added Planespotters.net source. You can't say that this website can't confirm the fleet. And the most important thing is that Saudia's fleet contains all of the aircraft which are supported by Planespotters.net. I don't know how do you define vandalism but my edit doesn't shows vandalism. Therefore it is kindly requested that if any better source, if you think, is available than Planespotters, then do mention it with the Aircraft type in Fleets' section. I've removed 757,747-300,etc from the fleets' section. Abdulrafey97 (talk) 16:47, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rickenbacker International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hahn ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Rickenbacker_International_Airport check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Rickenbacker_International_Airport?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:20, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Languages comment
To learn about Urdu-Hindi (Hindustani) see Indo-Aryan languages. To learn about Persian see Iranic languages and to learn about both see Indo-Iranic languages. For Arabic see Semitic languages.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 20:09, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  16:07, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ to . Do not edit while logged out after your return. Blocked for one month.

Former airline destination
Please do not add former destinations to lists of current destination. It makes no sense to have a list of "current destinations on a given date" which includes destinations that were not in operation on that date. Please create a new list of former destinations where it is appropriate. Thank you. Lard Almighty (talk) 16:11, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Martinair Cargo destinations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Martinair Cargo destinations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Martinair Cargo destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. FOARP (talk) 09:14, 17 July 2024 (UTC)