User talk:IntegrityMedia1

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Brooklyn Tabernacle Choir has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=159307935). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 14:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Copying material is a copyright violation. Your changes have been removed. See Copyright violations. -- SEWilco (talk) 15:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Also see Conflict of interest. -- SEWilco (talk) 15:57, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. -- SEWilco (talk) 16:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Israel Houghton in 2007.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Israel Houghton in 2007.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Gateway Worship has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  - Sorfane 18:43, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Business' FAQ and Conflict of interest.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy.

You may appeal this block by adding the text  or emailing the administrator who blocked you. Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry that we aren't explaining this in a way that is clear to you. There are situations in which a person might edit in areas in which they have a conflict of interest, but those situations are rare, and we all try to avoid editing articles about ourselves or our own businesses whenever possible. Your situation is not one of those situations in which a person would reasonably edit an article in which she has a conflict of interest. Your sole interest in Wikipedia seems to be promoting your own business. That's not something you're going to be able to do. If your motivation is not self-promotion but a desire to help write an encyclopedia, you will now cheerfully promise to avoid writing about your business, and help us write the encyclopedia in other ways. If your only interest in Wikipedia is writing about your business, then that just isn't something you are going to be able to do here, and it is not useful for you to continue making unblock requests looking for permission to promote your business- you're simply wasting your own time. Advertising and self-promotion are one of the most serious problems that harm Wikipedia- even more serious than teenaged vandals- and we take the problem of protecting Wikipedia from turning into a commercial directory very, very seriously. Users like you are exactly who the conflict of interest guidelines were written for; the grey areas in the guidelines are not there to help business owners promote their businesses, but for other, considerably rarer, situations. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:58, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Israel Houghton in 2008.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Israel Houghton in 2008.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk ) 20:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Brooklyn Tabernacle Choir from Crowd Perspective.jpg


The file File:Brooklyn Tabernacle Choir from Crowd Perspective.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)