User talk:Intelectual honesty

February 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Tanja Fajon.    Angry Harpy   talk 12:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Please provide evidence of it being defamatory or false. Intelectual honesty (talk) 12:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid you've got that whole burden-of-evidence thing a little backwards. Won't revert your recent reinstatement on account of WP:3RR, but do feel free to look forward to your coming indef.  Angry Harpy   talk 12:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

I have no problem in providing relevant evidence for any of my claims, i can take my time and make this a proper and FACTUAL article with all the required sources if that helps you? Intelectual honesty (talk) 14:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Again February 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tanja Fajon.

Welcome!
Hi Intelectual honesty! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 17:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

So tell me how do you dispute propaganda? i added many relevant links to prove that the newly added info was TRUE while the former was not, now we have 2 options, eather someone stops reverting my changes or i'll dedicate my time to automate the process through a vpn to make it censorship proof. I will not stand fake information and dangerous propaganda that has been abused for so long on this page. Intelectual honesty (talk) 09:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)