User talk:Intellectualhustle

Speedy deletion nomination of Breaux capital


A tag has been placed on Breaux capital, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 13:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Breaux Capital, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 13:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Breaux Capital. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 13:59, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Breaux Capital


A tag has been placed on Breaux Capital, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 22:15, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Contested deletion

 * I moved this section here from Talk:Breaux Capital so that it isn't lost after the article is deleted. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 03:09, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (All references validating the information presented are provided and are reputable third-party sources which illustrate the significance of this company being described. All information is factual and presented in an unbiased framework complying with Wikimedia best practices including but not limited to linking various other articles already contained in the Wikipedia library) --Intellectualhustle (talk) 22:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It's largely a matter of tone. To start the article off with the company's mission is to convey the company's own intentions, which isn't objective. To speak of it as a "space" where "... - together" is crafted as for an ad or a brochure, to allure the reader. "Their products are designed to increase the financial wellness ..." communicates "Here's what this company will do for you. And so forth.
 * Apart from that problem, please check Wikipedia's notability policy. Breaux Capital would need to meet the general notability guidelines or the guidelines applicable to organizations to qualify for inclusion. If you can come up with sufficient suitable independent reliable sources demonstrating notability, that will be fine, but I ran a Google search and I don't think that such coverage exists. Largoplazo (talk) 02:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I've deleted the article and rescued this section from its talk page. I agree with what Largoplazo says here - the reason this article got deleted was its promotional tone, but it also doesn't look like it has the sources necessary to ensure it passes Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 03:09, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Breaux Capital Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Breaux Capital Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

File:BREAUX Capital Logo.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BREAUX Capital Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:BREAUX Capital Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 6 August 2018 (UTC)