User talk:Intelligencereports

September 2020
Hello, I'm AussieWikiDan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Robert Brown (botanist, born 1773)  have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. AussieWikiDan (talk) 07:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Serols (talk) 07:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Thank you for your contributions&#32;to Robert Brown (botanist, born 1773), but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use your sandbox instead.    Spurrious Correlation  07:23, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. --Serols (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 08:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)