User talk:IntercontinentalX

Hello, I'm Davidelit. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Indonesian National Revolution without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Davidelit (Talk) 02:12, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Indonesian National Revolution, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Davidelit (Talk) 00:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Edit war warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Indonesian National Revolution. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. --MelanieN (talk) 16:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Further edit warring reminder
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Indonesian National Revolution. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.There is no consensus for your changes Davidelit (Talk) 14:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Long-term edit warring at Indonesian National Revolution
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. You've engaged in a long-term revert campaign at Indonesian National Revolution, since June 2014 on the question of Indonesian victory. You've never left a comment on the talk page or tried to get support from others. This block might be lifted if you will promise to get consensus before changing the article again. If there is no way to get you to discuss, your account may be indefinitely blocked. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)


 * If you plan to continue pushing your POV agenda, you will need to find references to support your claims. The Google Books page you cite refers to an Indonesian victory in the Battle of Surabaya. It also supports the article as it stands - nobody is arguing that Indonesia won a political or that its independence became official in 1949 - these are historical facts. Nowhere in "Conflict and Conquest in the Islamic World" does it talk about an Indonesian military victory. You have been asked to try and get consensus. Please do so. Regards Davidelit (Talk) 00:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=697607189 your edit] to Emirates (airline) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:36, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ], Qatar Airways, Singapore Airlines, South African Airways and United Airlines, is one of few airlines that fly to all six inhabited continents.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Turkish Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 17:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

March 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Indonesian National Revolution, you may be blocked from editing. Davidelit (Talk) 07:34, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Papua conflict, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 13:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

vandalism
Hello, I'm Hmains. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of war crimes have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hmains (talk) 01:58, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

May 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Indonesian National Revolution. Davidelit (Talk) 06:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I noticed that in this edit to Indonesian National Revolution, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 13:56, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Davidelit. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Papua conflict, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Davidelit (Talk) 01:23, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Papua conflict, you may be blocked from editing. MPS1992 (talk) 18:14, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.