User talk:Interncookross

May 2009
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 16:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:LauraMalinowski.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:LauraMalinowski.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:15, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Your WP:AFC Contribution
'''Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Cook Ross, Inc. was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MacMed''' talk to me! what have i done?  02:11, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Advert speak
"Cook Ross's philosophy is to help all people in organizations communicate effectively, recognize their value, develop themselves as leaders, and contribute powerfully to their organizations. They are committed to creating and nurturing learning communities. According to the company effective, constructive, and productive learning communities are based on the following fundamental principles:" "Cook Ross Offerings" Both the above to me say "This is by the company and plugging our stuff". Also, the total lack of any reference from outside Cook Ross suggests a lack of notability. Have a look at other company articles, and see if you can tell the difference between a Neutral Point of View and an advert. And find references. Your company's sites and anyone's blogs are not acceptable as independent references. The company site can be a link, but there MUST be outside references. Blogs may sometimes be used as links - but not as main ones. No site where people can edit or self publish is acceptable as an independent reference. (This rules out crunchbase, aboutus, and even Wikipedia itself. If this article appeared as it stands, I'd tag it for speedy deletion as spam, possibly adding lack of notability being shown. As you are trying to rescue it after an creation refusal, I'm trying to help you, as is the other commenter. Another point that looks spammy is the team photo section. The wide smiles say 'brochure'. Are they notable people? I don't think so - in Wikipedia terms. Sorry. The CEO, yes. The office manager (who may actually be the one who runs things... They often are unsung heroes.), no. Once again, you make claims in the article. Provide reliable (Wikipedia definition reliable) sources. Peridon (talk) 18:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for submitting an article at Articles for Creation. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia&. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article and resubmit when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Alexrexpvt (talk) 00:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:CCGuide.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CCGuide.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 01:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)