User talk:InternetWikiAccount

Mooksas, your comments regarding removal of Controversy section @ 02:00, 23 April 2009 do not have anything to do with a part regarding PirateBay's vs India and Ian email correspondence. Thus, strictly this part has been undo & reversed.

Thank you.

Medicare Set Aside
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Medicare Set Aside, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.iwci.org/Clues05/Sept2005.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Medicare Set Aside
A tag has been placed on Medicare Set Aside requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Oldlaptop321 (talk·contribs) 22:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. -- Oldlaptop321 (talk·contribs) 23:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Reply
I have replied to your statement at Talk:Medicare Set Aside. -- Oldlaptop321 (talk·contribs) 23:22, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Avatar (2009 film)
With respect to your adits about the Poul Anderson book, publishing your own opinions on Wikipedia is prohibited. If it is that obvious the similarities have probably been published elsewhere. Just do a google and see if it comes up with anything. Betty Logan (talk) 08:12, 27 December 2009 (UTC)