User talk:Interpuncts/Archive 1

September 2014
Hello, I'm JaconaFrere. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Dawes Act because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jacona (talk) 11:26, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * 1.

That's what I reverted it to. If you looked at my contributions, you'd see that my edits are in good faith, and are not aimed at causing detriment (you identified it as 'vandalism'.) Cheers. · &#124; (talk - contributions) 16:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * And while I'm at it, how is your reversion superior? It doesn't look that way from here. · &#124; (talk - contributions) 16:38, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Interpuncts, I completely agree that your edits are correct. I think I somehow got confused about which edits I was reverting.  My apologies! Jacona (talk) 18:41, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please do not vandalize articles, as you did here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Kingdom_general_election,_2015&diff=661440976&oldid=661440732 Wereon (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, please explain to me how that's vandalism. No, please do. · &#124; (talk - contributions) 19:13, 8 May 2015 (UTC)