User talk:Intime Biotech

Welcome!
Hello, Intime Biotech, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Intime Biotech/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 07:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Intime Biotech/sandbox


The page User:Intime Biotech/sandbox has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:
 * It seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://intime.digital/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 07:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
 Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text Intime Biotech (talk) 06:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC) at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 07:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Intime Biotech (talk) 12:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC)


 * YOu were blocked for violating WP:USERNAME and WP:PROMO, so yes there was a reason given for blocking. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Signatures should be placed at the end of the post, not the beginning, and new posts should be placed at the bottom of the page/section, for proper discussion flow. 331dot (talk) 21:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Intime Biotech (talk) 06:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Again per WP:COI, WP:PAID and WP:PROMO you will not be unblocked to edit about you company. Lavalizard101 (talk) 10:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd recommend revoking talk page access because the user clearly isn't listening. PhilKnight (talk) 11:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Oleg, note that the articles about Facebook and Google are not written by representatives of those companies, but by independent, volunteer editors who take note of the company in independent reliable sources with significant coverage and choose on their own to write about it. Wikipedia is not a company directory where every company gets an article.  It depends on the coverage in sources, showing that the company meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company.  Wikipedia is not interested in what a company wants to say about itself. Note that a Wikipedia article is not necessarily desirable, there are good reasons to not want one. If your only goal here is to write about your company, I would suggest withdrawing your request. 331dot (talk) 11:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)