User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive 15

Speedy deletion declined: Ahs dert
Hello Jinkinson. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ahs dert, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is a curriculum, not an A7-eligible person/group. Thank you. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 07:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 16:27, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Howard H. Hays page
Hello. I was actively working on the page when you flagged it for speedy deletion. I did not know that the page could be reviewed or seen before I hit "Save" for the first time. I have moved the entire body of text that I was working on to my user sandbox at User:Stevenmg/sandbox/Howard H. Hays where I will continue to work on it before putting it in the article space. If you see any additional issues with it at that time, do please let me know. Stevenmg (talk) 20:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Entry on "Bahadir Kaleagasi"
Thaks for warning, I added his references as I could ad verified the accuracy of the information, especially about his books. — Preceding unsigned comment added by G20.Planet (talk • contribs) 22:01, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Republika Srpska national basketball team
Hello Jinkinson. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Republika Srpska national basketball team, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Equilibrium (video game)
Can you please tell me why this is being deleted? It stated because there aren't citations, but there are. This is an actual game that is highly anticipated from several known gaming industry devs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaosngn (talk • contribs) 04:11, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes. The reason is because at the time I tagged it for speedy deletion, it was very short and had no citations. If you want to know why there is a notability tag on the article, ask, the user who placed it there. Jinkinson   talk to me  04:40, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Emily Willingham
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Jeffrey Beall
Hey, thanks for dealing with that vandalism on the page about me. I really appreciate it. I saw it but thought it best not to edit the page. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 00:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of Anumol
Give time. It's under construction. --Alfasst (talk) 01:48, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * All right, I removed the template, but given that this article has been deleted before, I expect it to be expanded a great deal in the next few days. Jinkinson   talk to me  01:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Alfasst (talk) 01:59, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Use of different language citation usage
Hi, I have been trying to edit some pages in Hindi Wikipedia but the supported citations or URL's are very less (of the topic in Hindi language searching) in number in comparison to the same topic in English searching. My question: is it fair to support English or other language URL's and citations for editing in Hindi Wikipedia, and if yes then up to what extent? Please elaborate. Thanking for your co-operation. Work2win (talk) 22:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
arent they so cute i love cats please send me a message too!

Rocko505 (talk) 21:09, 28 November 2013 (UTC) 

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Quick Note about MetroTech Records
Hi, thanks for your deletion proposal, I have edited it a bit more if that is OK. Thank you for your co-operation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WindowsXPcitizen335 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive
 Hello, Jinkinson:

WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:09, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

attack page
i AM DOING IT IN MY USERSPACE, NOT IN THE MAINSPACE.tHESE RULES DONT APPLY IN USERSPACE. i AM NOT VANDALIZING. OR ATTACKING ANYONE. IT IS MANNERS AND NESSARY TO FIRST INFORM TO USER WHOSE PAGE YOU ARE EDITING BEFORE YOU DO. tHIS WILL NOT BE TOLERATED. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liberalufp (talk • contribs) 00:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Fine. I have removed the Speedy template, given both this message and the fact that you seem to be a relatively experienced editor. However, ideally, this page should be located at a title less disparaging to its subject. Just a suggestion, and I will stay out of other peoples' subpages in the future. Jinkinson   talk to me  00:08, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Deletion sorting
Hello Jinkinson: I've noticed your contributions at AfD in deletion sorting, which is much appreciated. In case you weren't aware of its existence, here's the master list of all delete sort categories: WikiProject Deletion sorting/Flat. Happy editing! Northamerica1000(talk) 03:24, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Hey, I would like to know if you know anything about MAKEUP. becuase that is my new page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chuckybear101 (talk • contribs) 06:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Makeup for Children
Hey i just wanted to know if you can put makeup down there. Any answers. Thank you for ur help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chuckybear101 (talk • contribs) 07:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Closing VPR discussion
Hi,

Considering the feedback from the community at large, I thought it was sensible to close your proposal at the Village Pump, since the discussion didn't look like it would head somewhere. I hope you don't mind me closing.

Regards, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 09:24, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Deletion sorting
Hi Jinkinson, thanks for contributions to deletion sorting. However I noticed you delsorted this deletion discussion under People. Where a person is eligible to be listed under Businesspeople, Actor etc. it's best to list them there, rather than under People as it just swamps that generic People delsort. For example a Painter would be listed under People & Visual arts whereas a Track & Field athlete would be listed under Sportspeople. A list of delsorts, alternative to people can be found here. Regards ★☆ DUCK IS JAMMMY ☆★ 13:08, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Thaikkudam Bridge
Hello Jinkinson. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Thaikkudam Bridge to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 16:24, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi this is Meswara
Please let me know how to retain the page I have created about Sri Siddheswarananada Bharati Swamiji yesterday. I have provided URL as link for the Peetam I referred too in my page as original source.

Meswara (talk) 05:54, 4 December 2013 (UTC) Meswara — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meswara (talk • contribs) 05:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

PatternHunter
Thank you for editing my page up to standard. I'm not sure how it works, but I hope that you read the article and see that it is not actually a candidate for speedy deletion (CSD). Once again, thanks. EmaadP92 (talk) 18:48, 6 December 2013 (UTC)EmaadP92

Bath Cabinet Makers
This was a sandbox contribution which was not ready to be submitted. Please delete it ASAP. I would like to start again. Sally Festing Sally Festing (talk) 22:15, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * As it states on the top of my talk page, I am not an admin and therefore cannot delete anything. If you want the page Bath Cabinet Makers deleted (the other one already has been deleted), replace the content with the following:  Jinkinson   talk to me  22:18, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

"Something sweet artisan cafe's" article
Hello Jinkinson.Could you help me please to clarify where the issues are in the article ? (if you have the time at the moment that is) Thanks Sugarbasin (talk) 00:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure. Take the sentence "Founded by three brothers with a passion of doing something different in the credit boom." This suggests that you may have a connection with this company and/or its founders, as it is not sourced. Which brings me to the need for more reliable sources--the article currently has only one, and much of it seems to be original research, which Wikipedia generally frowns upon. In retrospect, it's not that promotional, but it could do without sentences like the one I quoted above. Jinkinson   talk to me  00:26, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Ok well, i just made a few edits and changed the sentence you highlighted. would you mind checking it again to see if the changes are appropriate? Sugarbasin (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC) maybe remove the word >different< from the sentence also? Sugarbasin (talk) 00:32, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

New Page Patrol
Hi. Thank you  for patrolling  new pages. Please return to Something Sweet Artisan Cafe's and be sure to  tag  it  appropriately  as not  meeting  notability  requirements for lack  for multiple, in-depth sources. Alternatively, you may  wish  to  search  for more sources. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Immediate block can and should be sought
Hey Jinkinson. I just wanted to let you know that when you come upon an editor like Mormonpride333 posting blatant racist hate speech, you can report immediately to WP:AIV. Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy. Any admin worth their salt would block this account in a second (without the need for any slavish adherence to the normal warning scheme or even a single warning having been left), and it would be good if that did occur as fast as possible given the nature of the edits. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 06:06, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Autism journals
Hi, There are two issues with this cat you just created. The first one is technical: it is a subcat of Category:Psychiatry journals, so if a journal is added to "autism journals", it should be removed from "psychiatry journals". The second point is more fundamental. I'm not sure it is a good idea to have a category for journals on a single disease, because it gives the wrong impression, namely that these are the only journals publishing on autism. Almost all (if not all) journal in "psychiatry journals" will regularly publish research related to ASD. Obviously, you cannot categorize any journal that has ever published something on autism in "autism journals". For one thing, that would include all "psychiatry journals", and probably a good amount of "neuroscience journals", "neurology journals", and "pediatrics journals", too. Have a look at Category:Medical journals and you'll see that they are all named after areas of specialization, not specific disorders. In addition, I personally think that "autism" is actually a collection of disorders that look similar, but have different causes. Should that ever be proven, then we'd have to re-categorize everything again (but I admit that the latter issue is only very minor). Let me know what you think. --Randykitty (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * This first point is a good one. I have removed it from the category psychiatry journals. As for the second point, I suppose that it is true that we see articles in journals like Nature that have to do with autism even though such journals do not publish exclusively in this area, but maybe a new name for my category, like "child psychiatry journals", would be more appropriate. Perhaps a thread should be started at WP:CFD. Jinkinson   talk to me  16:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Removing the category "psychiatry journals" is not a good idea at all. You cannot have a "standalone" category, it has to be integrated into the category tree. So if "autism journals" is going to stay, it must be in "psychiatry journals" (and the individual entries removed from that cat). Making a cat "child psychiatry" would make more sense in the current framework of journal cats, but that would add just 4 more journals. The psychiatry journal cat has only 81 entries, so I don't really see the need to split off more subcats. --Randykitty (talk) 16:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Alright, you have convinced me that this category should not exist. It is now empty and I have tagged it for speedy deletion. Jinkinson   talk to me  16:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 17:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Update regarding AfC backlog drive auto-updating with AFCBuddy
Manual updating of your Backlog Elimination Drive page is no longer necessary. The AFCBuddy bot is now automatically updating AfC reviews that are performed when using the Helper script. The bot-generated pages are located at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/December 2013 - January 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive/[Your user name].

Importantly, please note that any re-reviews you may have performed will need to be manually copied and pasted to the bot-generated pages. Thank you for participating in the drive. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:35, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Katie Couric and HPV
I noticed your good edit. I was collecting sources for a section, similar to what happened at Jenny_McCarthy. Because I don't have time, I'll put my list here and let you work with it, if you wish:


 * Katie Couric

The original content which started the controversy:


 * http://katiecouric.com/2013/12/04/the-hpv-vaccine-controversy-rosie-perez/

Responses


 * http://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2013/12/04/katie-couric-promotes-anticancer-vaccine-alarmism/


 * http://ideas.time.com/2013/12/04/is-katie-couric-the-next-jenny-mccarthy/?iid=tsmodule


 * http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-katie-couric-20131204,0,4371413.story#axzz2n2rGBSjN


 * http://www.thewire.com/politics/2013/12/katie-couric-feeds-hpv-vaccine-controversy/355781/


 * http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/12/05/katie-couric-on-the-hpv-vaccine-antivaccine-or-irresponsible-journalist-you-be-the-judge/


 * http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2013/12/05/anti_vaccine_katie_couric_program_gives_false_balance_to_dangerous_quackery.html


 * http://www.chillicothegazette.com/article/20131207/OPINION04/312070040/Did-Couric-put-ratings-above-science-health-?nclick_check=1


 * http://www.autismdailynewscast.com/hpv-campaigner-katie-couric-compared-to-autism-vaccine-campaigner-jenny-mccarthy-by-the-washington-times/5426/snapshot/

...and the Washington Times source mentioned in the previous link, with a link about the staff status of the author:


 * http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/steps-authentic-happiness-positive-psychology/2013/dec/5/vaccine-disinformation-katie-couric-hpv-and-jenny-/


 * http://communities.washingtontimes.com/staff/paul-mountjoy/

Brangifer (talk) 05:06, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Promotional tone and citation
You said it is a promotional tone. Would help me in this regard? How not to make it promotional especially if it is an introduction about something?

You have asked about citation that I will work on as long as the article does not go into delete section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quwatkhan (talk • contribs) 06:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)


 * What the article needs are reliable sources independent of the subject, so that rules out The Dardistan Times' Facebook and Twitter pages, for example. By "promotional tone" I am referring to the use of peacock terms such as "hard-hitting"; Wikipedia articles should not be written like an advertisement. Additionally, there are problems with, for example, the UNHCR source, in which the Times is mentioned, but it is not the subject of the UNHCR article. Read WP:WEBCRIT for more information. Jinkinson   talk to me  16:40, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

I will go through it again and see if I can improve. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quwatkhan (talk • contribs) 18:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Third opinion request
The 3O request you made on behalf of Softlavender and Genometer has been removed because there has not been any thorough talk page discussion of the issue as required by the 3O guidelines. Per the dispute resolution policy, all moderated content dispute resolution requires that the dispute be extensively discussed by the disputants before assistance will be provided. Regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 20:38, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Hey
Have some patience. Many authors take a few edits to complete a new article. By editing it within a few minutes of their edits, one can create edit conflicts that can disrupt their work flow, and if they dont have a cache, make them lose a lot of hard work.--Metallurgist (talk) 21:30, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Sorry. I was just trying to save the page from being speedied, but I guess my intervention was, and often is, not needed. Jinkinson  talk to me   What did he do now?  21:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * BTW, if you don't want anyone other than you to touch the article right after you start it, add the under construction template, and I won't touch it. Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  01:19, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Siva Balaji
hi, why am i getting proposed for deletion messages even after the submission of sufficient references? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vamseesasidhar (talk • contribs) 13:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I am looking at SIva Balaji, and all I see are links to other Wikipedia articles, rather than references to independent sources. Links to other Wikipedia articles aren't sufficient references, see WP:RS. Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  13:33, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Beat me to it!
Right when I was tagging Jacob blood for G3...you beat me to it. Guess you win then  『Woona』  Dear Celestia...   14:46, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Gnaw
I've removed the speedy deletion template, as there does now seem to be a legitimate claim of notability and a little editing removed the spammy parts. If you're still concerned about the notability of the group, you're welcome to take it to AfD. J Milburn (talk) 19:27, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Do I have to add something
Hi Jinkinson, thank you for editing my new page. I'm new on wikipedia and I'm wondering about the text: "This article relies on references to primary sources. Please add references to secondary or tertiary sources. (December 2013)". The source is from 1go1.net and from the German version https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Lee. Do I have to add something? Would it help, if I ad links to the exhibition spaces, that the reader could see the artist name on this external page? Please also consider the mentioned books on the bottom of the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Lee. Best, monika
 * What I mean by primary sources is that several of the handful of links in the external links section are to Lee's own website, 1go1.net. It would help if you added links/references that weren't created by Lee himself. Other than that, thanks for translating the article into English. Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  03:50, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 05:44, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cardinal Health, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CVS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

joshuaaaronhill
Hey, this is about the Welcome to the show re make. I tried to link that page to the Artist profile but i could not do it, that's why i made a new page for it. I was talking to the person who made the original page as i did it, we are working on making that page perfectly up to standards with wiki( The Jokerr page and all affiliated pages) and that was the only option i saw to make it link to the Welcome to the show page.

Joshuaaaronhill (talk) 06:04, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, it appears the Jokerr's article is up for deletion, and is probably going to get deleted as it doesn't appear to meet our notability guidelines for musicians; thus his albums' articles will likely get deleted as well. Try finding more reliable sources than YouTube and iTunes if you want the Jokerr's article to stay. Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  14:47, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Joseph Buxbaum was accepted
 Joseph Buxbaum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! JSFarman (talk) 14:47, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

David P. Levin article
Thanks for the heads up regarding citations. I went back and added the URL's as you suggested, if it's not too much trouble, could you check that I did it correctly? Thanks.

Onel5969 (talk) 00:21, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The references are formatted okay, but the sources you are using as references aren't very reliable--particularly IMDB. I suggest you find other more reliable sources than that, since IMDB can be edited by anyone with account, much like Wikipedia. See also WP:External links/Perennial websites. Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  00:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks again... I will look for other sources to cite, information on this topic is sparse (one of the reasons I wrote the article). When I do, I will replace the existing citations. Onel5969 (talk) 00:34, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Buxbaum article
Hiya - I just accepted the article and went to look at who the author was, because it's so well-written - not surprised to find out it's you. Nice to meet you. Great article, cool subject. Julie JSFarman (talk) 14:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Wait, wait, did you just trout me????? I'm mortified.  JSFarman (talk) 05:30, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * No, no, someone else trouted me. Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  11:58, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Well then. Phew. JSFarman (talk) 03:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm WereSpielChequers. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Aleksandar Simeonov, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  14:06, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the templating, it was an auto message for marking a page as uncurated. Looking at the history you tagged the page for deletion and that template got removed. I've deleted the page now.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  14:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Hansard
Hi. Would you mind please dropping a reply at Talk:Hansard? Thanks. (Also, I think your RfA analysis is unnecessarily harsh!) Merry Christmas, anyway. Cheers. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 15:59, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Marshall Goodman article decline inquiry
Greetings. I am inquiring about sources for the Marshall Goodman article(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Marshallartsmusic/sandbox) that was declined on 12/2/13. Would the following sources meet your requirements under "criteria for musicians and ensembles"?

http://www.allmusic.com/artist/long-beach-dub-all-stars-mn0000227268/awards

http://www.thepier.org/live-l-b-d-a-beyond-i-sight-1-25-13/

Sublime - Stories ,Tales, Lies and Exaggerations (1998) DVD

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1454551/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1

http://www.allmusic.com/artist/long-beach-dub-all-stars-mn0000227268/biography

http://www.thepier.org/live-long-beach-dub-all-stars-2-11-12/

If not, would you refer a couple of music-based web sources that would meet your requirement?

I have found that the listed links, and media source, have been used by other musicians--including other Long Beach Dub Allstars' band members--as sources for their Wikipedia articles.

Thanks in advance for your feedback.

Marshallartsmusic (talk) 05:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Northamerica1000(talk) 14:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Animal models of autism
Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Discussion about your list
Just a heads up:


 * Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine

Brangifer (talk) 23:13, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

MEDRS
Hi. Could you please read over WP:MEDRS and make sure that you follow its guidelines when citing medical claims? In general, you should not be citing primary research articles. There are also discussions at WT:MED and WP:FTN over the appropriateness of your last DYK the hook for the last DYK article you worked on. Thanks,  Sunrise    (talk)  16:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Congratulations, you're the millionth person to tell me about MEDRS. I know about MEDRS very well, and I have tried to abide by it, but evidently I have not been trying hard enough. Anyway, I replaced one of the primary sources in Animal models of autism but I suspect you have an issue with the inclusion of the Hornig study, given that it is a primary source. However, I think it should stay provided that we say that it is contradicted by the views of every major scientific body on the planet, so we don't give undue weight to the discredited notion of a thimerosal-autism link. Also, I intend to add a reference to a secondary source to the Animal models page section about the Hornig study. BTW, I did not nominate it as a DYK, and had I done so I wouldn't have chosen to mention the Hornig study in the hook given the kerfuffle I knew it would cause.  Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  20:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, and as for my addition of primary sources on Thimerosal controversy, I am only doing what previous editors have done on that page, namely find epidemiological studies that contradict a link between thimerosal and autism and add mention of them one by one in the "population studies" section. I notice that you have removed the Deth study, the Hornig study, the Miles study and the Tozzi study. I can understand the removal of the first two, given that in vitro and animal studies are advised against in WP:MEDRS, but the last two should probably stay there, as they support the consensus view that thimerosal doesn't cause autism. If you're removing Tozzi and Miles, why not Hviid, Thompson, and Stehr-Green? Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  20:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply! I haven't worked with DYK before, so since you didn't nominate the article, I have struck and reworded my comments above and at FTN. Let me know if there's anywhere else I should do that. In the meantime, I've figured out who actually made the nomination and I will go talk to them instead. :-)
 * In response to your questions, I don't think whether the sources support the scientific consensus is an important issue in this case (the reason we have to check this in the first place is that due weight is determined using the secondary sources, which tell us what the consensus is). Perhaps my "fails MEDRS" comment in the edit summary was too strong (my personal standards are somewhat higher than MEDRS; maybe I'm misunderstanding part of the guideline?) - but the article already has plenty of primary studies with N in the tens of thousands or higher, so I don't see why we need these new ones with low N. For the examples you mention: I identified the sources from the history as those which had been recently added, so I didn't check the article in detail. Stehr-Green appears to be secondary (they did not collect the data they analyzed), whereas Hviid and Thompson appear to be primary. I would call Hviid a useful source for the article due to the massive N, but I would remove Thompson. I will hold off while I start a new talk page section.  Sunrise    (talk)  01:17, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Declined article creation Boon Tuan Boon-Itt
Hi Jinkinson, You decline the creation of my article "Boon Tuan Boon-Itt" as you say he is a non-notable person. He may be insignificant in the West, but he is notable in Thai church history at the first Thai person to start a Thai Protestant church (which I have now added to the article). He is known here in Thailand, even if he is not in the West. Thai church history is a very under-developed academic discipline, partly because of the small number of Christians in Thailand and the small number of foreign scholars who can read and write the Thai language. But I am trying to remedy that :-)

The reason why we don't yet have any well-known English language publishers with books about him. But the "Historical Sketch of Protestant Missions" listed in the References is published by White Lotus, a well-known publisher of English-language books about history and culture in Southeast Asia. But Southeast Asian history is not very well known, which is why you may not have heard of them.

Can you reconsider your decline?

Dahlfred (talk) 05:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Seconded. Especially as Wikipedia is aiming to reduce systemic bias to Western culture. DFH (talk) 09:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC) (Long term Wikipedian).


 * I have reviewed the draft and approved it - the sources provided are clearly sufficient per WP:N. BTW, per WP:NOENG sources do not need to be in English. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:54, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Kimball Atwood
I have done some work on the Kimball Atwood article, mostly just formatting the refs. The Institute for Science in Medicine ref has some material that might be useful for expanding the article. A list of selected publications might be in order as well as mention that he is a founding fellow of ISM and a fellow of CSI. I don't know if his appearance on SGU is notable. The TACT study discussion could possibly be expanded. - - MrBill3 (talk) 13:57, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Unrelated PS: You might want to archive your talk page. - - MrBill3 (talk) 13:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

New Page Patrol
Hi. I'm just  letting  you  know that  I  have tagged  Miss Beauty Doll for deletion per A7 which  you  patrolled as acceptable with  a simple maintenance tag. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Alycia Halladay was accepted
 Alycia Halladay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Bddmagic (talk) 19:22, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Hi
Instead of placing Archive1/LindaThelenius up for deletion you could have contacted me and asked me to change the articles name if that is the issue. You know fully well that it is a archive. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 22:24, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your assistance. Will not do the same name for the archives again. Thank you!--BabbaQ (talk) 22:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of the thimerosal controversy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of the thimerosal controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of the thimerosal controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 03:08, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Abhijit majumdar
Hello Jinkinson. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Abhijit majumdar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: " composed above 1000 album songs,43 films,20 mega siriels for odia film industry" - passes WP:A7. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 05:43, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 December 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 06:43, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Muayad Jajo
Hello Jinkinson. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Muayad Jajo, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:19, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2014 WikiCup!
Hello Jinkinson, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found here. The competition will begin at midnight tonight (UTC). There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at WikiCup/Scoring, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2014 is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at WikiCup/Advice for younger editors for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! , and  17:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2014_January_2#Sydney_Uni_Lions
You are invited to join the discussion at Deletion_review/Log/2014_January_2.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 02:23, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Aaron Swartz
I have removed the "connected contributor" template that you placed on Talk:Aaron Swartz. While I can understand why that tag might technically have been applicable at one point, the fact is that given the number of editors who have contributed to the article and the massive expansion since User:AaronSw last edited it, the portion of the article directly derived from AaronSw's edits is small. In addition, the template contains a pointer to the conflict of interest guideline, which is no longer relevant for obvious tragic reasons. I hope you will agree that we can live without this tag. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 15:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jinkinson, Thank you for your help, but I'm still stuck my page doesn't exist I get the links in red and still only shows as USER, I do have reviews from major newspapers from UK like Guardian as you can see on my wikipedia page under legacy from my band plus had important songs in UK, please be so kind to inform me how to get it active in wikipedia. My page is Ibatabros Kind regards jose Ibatabros — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibatabros (talk • contribs) 17:52, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Autism Research and Treatment


The article Autism Research and Treatment has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Not notable yet. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 23:24, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 06:24, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Autism omnibus trial
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Autism omnibus trial you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. GregJackP  Boomer!   07:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

schools in New Delhi
Hello Jinkinson,

I was trying to create a category by the above name. Since categories such as schools in east delhi and west delhi already exist, I realized that a number of schools listed on the schools in delhi belong in the south delhi sub category. Blessinvarkey (talk) 17:51, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Oh, okay. In that case, you should search for "Category:Schools in South Delhi" and create that page instead of the Schools in South Delhi one. This is how you create categories. Jinkinson   talk to me  17:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Rajeev satav
I removed your CSD A7 tag because I believe the statement that the subject is the president of the Indian Youth Congress is a credible claim to notability. However, the article Rajiv Satav already exists and seems to be about the same subject, so I replaced it with an A10 tag. X X X antiuser eh? 01:24, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion of the article "2013-2014 BC calc w/Mr. Leddy
Please do delete the article I created "2013-2014 BC calc w/Mr. Leddy". I only created the article to "test the waters" of Wikipedia. Sorry for any inconvenience. MattAlvey50 (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2014 (UTC)


 * As it states at the top of this page, I am not an admin and therefore can't delete anything. If you want it deleted, replace its contents with the following template: Also, if you want to test Wikipedia, go to WP:SANDBOX.  Jinkinson   talk to me  18:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jan C. Childress
Hi Jinkison! I just received an alert on my page from November 29, 2013, that my article on Jan C. Childres was proposed for deletion due to having no references. There are several references on the page, so I just wanted to make sure that the page would remain. Please confirm. Thanks Kershawdraw (talk) 22:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, it looks like the article, since it now has 5 references, will not be eligible for deletion. However, it could use some more independent, reliable sources, as opposed to, for example, Photobucket and a blog (i.e. references 3 and 4). Jinkinson   talk to me  00:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Claude Sabbah
You wrote me concerning Claude Sabbah's page I've created. The main pages are in french and german Wikipedia, and I wrote a little sentence to create the page in the english version. I'm french and my english is not so good, I will try to make a good page, but I really hope that other people (who have a better english) will help me to translate the information. Thank you. Maitreidmry (talk) 01:53, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Please add some sources to the article, as it is a BLP and therefore needs sources or else it will be deleted. Jinkinson   talk to me  02:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

I've added books he has wrote, which is the most important source of his work. However, I have a problem with the ISBN, they don't appear correctly. Maitreidmry (talk) 02:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Arthur Beaudet was accepted
 Arthur Beaudet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 03:19, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 09:06, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Well... HOW THE HECK DO YOU REPLACE SOMETING ON ANOTHER AREICLE!!?!?!?!?!?!?!!????!?!??
krisztian 16:26, 11 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkbkkbkkb (talk • contribs) Oh... and by the way, it was all good intentions.  NO HARM INTENDED  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkbkkbkkb (talk • contribs) 16:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

AFD
As you already know, an article you recently created I AFDed it. Let's see what happens. QuackGuru ( talk ) 23:41, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Barbara Rosenblat
I got a message from you saying I didn't have any references in the article I started for Barbara Rosenblat. I think you reviewed it while I was still figuring out how to add links. I have added a number of links to Wikipedia pages that include her. I added her IMDB page and some other outside references - hopefully that helps? Scowls (talk) 02:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scowls (talk • contribs) 23:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, this definitely helps, particularly the recordedbooks.com link. However, IMDB is not particularly highly regarded as a reliable source, since its content is contributed by users in much the same way as Wikipedia's content is. See External_links/Perennial_websites. Also, her official website is a primary source, and as such is not ideal for articles about living people (see WP:BLPPRIMARY). Jinkinson   talk to me  02:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

They still say there are no references and are threatening to delete the page. Do you have any idea what kind of sources they are willing to see as reliable? I added a NY Times article - if that's not considered a reference or a reliable source then I don't know what is. 108.27.24.78 (talk) 12:04, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Never mind - looks like it passed muster - thanks for your assistance! 108.27.24.78 (talk) 18:33, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

European company lawyers association
The article is created by blocked user ECLAcontact and account creation by that user has been blocked, I've tagged this article for speedy deletion. Nechlison (talk) 17:35, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Good catch. I can't help but wonder why we even need that criterion, since if they were blocked, wouldn't they be prevented from editing Wikipedia and thus from creating new pages? Ah well, I'm sure I'm just missing some technical aspect of blocking here. Jinkinson   talk to me  05:00, 14 January 2014 (UTC)