User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive 16

Jimbo semi-retired?
I have undone that edit to User:Jimbo Wales. I find that a bold conclusion that he is '(semi-)retired', he may just not have much time, be on holiday, do his work elsewhere on Wikipedia (other wikis, or even behind the scenes). I don't even think that not editing outside of his user-talk (and in the last 100 edits there are 4 mainspace edits, and edits to talkpages) make someone (semi-)retired either. Thanks! --Dirk Beetstra T C 19:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

No7t funny. Don't do that again. --Jimbo Wales (talk) 09:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry Jimbo. Yeah, this definitely wasn't my proudest moment on this site. I'll try to stay out of other people's userspace from now on. Jinkinson   talk to me  13:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

CoinMKT
Hey Jinkinson! I've been seeing a lot of cryptocurrency-related articles on Wikipedia. According to WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet their are over 5 cryptocurrency-related articles up for deletion, I'm not sure if this is a problem, but since many lack notability it's becoming a problem. Best ///Euro Car  GT  01:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello Jinkinson! Could you please tell me in brief why you doubt on the sources of information for this article is unrelieable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Sweatpants_Day Thank you in advance. talk to me  —Preceding undated comment added 00:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Margaret Hutchinson - Cat:English educators
Hiya Thanks for adding the category to Margaret Hutchinson - unfortunately it has gone in under M instead of H - is it possible for me to correct this or will it correct itself eventually? Still quite new here... Tony Holkham (talk) 00:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

International Sweatpants Day
Hello Jinkinson! Could you please tell me in brief why you doubt on the sources of information for this article is unrelieable. Thank you in advance. Mohammadnasiruddin (talk) 00:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, Facebook isn't a reliable or independent source. See WP:RS and WP:GNG. However, it seems as though dw.de is in fact a reliable source (at least in Germany). Accordingly, I have removed the proposed deletion tag, as some of the article's sources are reliable. However, we are now left with an even bigger problem-- it seems that a significant part of this (admittedly very short) article was a copyright violation of one of the cited sources, and I have tagged it as such. In the future, please try to write things in your own words. Jinkinson   talk to me  01:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

New proposals at Pending changes/Request for Comment 2014
Hello. Several new proposals have been submitted at Pending changes/Request for Comment 2014 since you last commented on it. You are invited to return to comment on the new proposals. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

International Sweatpants Day
Hey, I've removed your copyvio tag on International Sweatpants Day because you didn't list it at Copyright problems. I've replaced it with a CSD tag for WP:CSD and WP:CSD. Cheers, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 03:53, 16 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks, and sorry for not listing it there. I'm rather new to this copyvio tagging thing (outside of the CSD, anyway), so hopefully I won't make this mistake in the future. Jinkinson   talk to me  03:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)


 * It's not a problem. :) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:33, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbComm
Hi. Re: ArbComm, thanks for the edit synchronizing this redirect with ArbCom. :-) --MZMcBride (talk) 03:55, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Page deleted
I'm afraid I had to speedy your subpage "Cowardly admins" as an attack page. Plus, it contained one user who hasn't been an admin in a long time (even though they did protect their userpage in 2008). Bishonen &#124; talk 09:23, 17 January 2014 (UTC).

Murder of Georgia Williams
I have now corrected the contradiction. I mixed up the date of her death (5/26) with that of the arrest (5/29). Áccénté Áígúé (talk) 14:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Removal of Citation message
Hi, in the section of page Boar, Boar#Mythology, it is asking citations for showing that Vishnu took avatar of Varaha, a boar. So i had already inserted book sources, but the citation message is still not removed for a substantial time since. Though this is small thing, but you can fix this and mention if the sources put are not reliable. Work2win (talk) 20:53, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, if there is a citation for a statement in this article, as there clearly is here (in fact, there are 4), and no one else will remove the citation needed tag, you can just do so yourself. I have removed it for you here, though. Jinkinson   talk to me  20:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Very thanking for your very speedy reply, well i didn't removed the citation message because i had thought citation message should be removed by an editor, admin, etc. but not by an autoconfirmed user(like me), since the citation message might be useful for removing any error, or fault in the page. Anyway i have got the answer. Work2win (talk) 21:24, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:38, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for fixing that, I actually didn't know I did that. Maybe it was a friend, but whatever.

Thanks ^_^ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.95.9.225 (talk) 07:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Minecraft vs Starcraft 2
Hi. Not entirely sure if that should be an A1 or an A3 since it has plenty of context, just no good content. I would have marked that one except I wasn't sure what it should be :D Usb10  plug me in 00:25, 21 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Good point. I myself wasn't sure either, and you can change the rationale. A1 is basically the one I use when it is clearly eligible for speedy deletion, but I'm not sure which template to use. Jinkinson   talk to me  00:27, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

GA nomination of Autism omnibus trial
Hi, I notice that you've got the GA nomination for Autism omnibus trial underway, and that the reviewer made a few comments. Any problems if I get to work on those comments? I'd like to have a GA under my wings and it was interesting to collaborate previously. --LT910001 (talk) 02:29, 23 January 2014 (UTC)


 * No problem at all. I was planning on doing it myself but he posted so much stuff in the review that it kind of intimidated me (also I have been busy IRL lately). Please, don't hesitate to fix the problems he identified. Jinkinson   talk to me  02:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Text of deleted article CFDCalc
Hi, the article CFDCalc created by me was deleted. Can you kindly provide me the text for my own record? Thanks! --Chenyiaero (talk) 18:39, 23 January 2014 (UTC)


 * No I cannot, because only administrators can view or restore deleted content, and as it states at the top of this page, I am not an administrator. You might want to go to WP:UND instead if you think this website was notable. Also, you should be prepared to add reliable sources to the article if it gets restored. Jinkinson   talk to me  18:41, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy (CRMEP), Jinkinson.

Unfortunately ColonelHenry has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

"you might want to consider finding some sources that are not connected to CRMEP to develop the article, and bring it into conformity content-wise with the guidelines on how to organize articles at Wikiproject:Universities"

To reply, leave a comment on ColonelHenry's talk page.
 * Oops, that was an error. UGH. Bad day over here. that was meant for the article writer.--ColonelHenry (talk) 03:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 02:32, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Administrators (Wikipedia)
Hello! Your submission of Administrators (Wikipedia) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Soham  07:33, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Administrators (Wikipedia) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Administrators (Wikipedia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Administrators (Wikipedia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  03:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Jordan French for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan French is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jordan French until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kevin Gorman (talk) 22:24, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

About that picture of me.
Hi, that picture of me was actually taken this month, not in 2005. I changed the date on the picture to make it "float" to the bottom of my Flickr pictures so that no one could find it there ... So much for that!. Thanks, Jeffrey Beall (talk) 20:06, 27 January 2014 (UTC).

AfD
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, as you did with Logo of Wikipedia. It was the correct link, and if you had clicked on it, you would have seen that.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  21:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I guess. It depends on how you define "correct," though--the link was clearly to an AFD for the article Administrators (Wikipedia), not Logo of Wikipedia, and I was under the impression that if you wanted to nominate two or more pages for deletion you had to create a separate AFD for each of them. However, it seems that, in fact, you can nominate 5 articles for deletion in only one AFD discussion. Now that I know this, I will be more careful looking at articles nominated for deletion in the future. Jinkinson   talk to me  21:56, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I've seen upwards of 20 nominated in bulk, in cases where the reason for it is identical (generally, also the author and timeframe is also identical, but not always). It's not common, but it's not at all rare.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  22:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timothy Ball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Timothy Ball


A tag has been placed on Timothy Ball, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. jps (talk) 18:57, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Well, it's out of article space now. I hope you're happy, Joshua. Jinkinson   talk to me  19:10, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Timothy Ball
You just beat me to removing the db tag from the userfied page. My reason for userfying is the close of the DRV at Deletion review/Log/2011 January 3. This clearly envisages that a new article could be acceptable, but I think you should check it out with and/or  before it goes live. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:16, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ashdin Publishing


The article Ashdin Publishing has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable publisher. Just being on Beall's list is not enough to make a publisher notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 19:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 January newsletter
The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer, whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:


 * and were the first people to score, for the good article Tropical Storm Bret (1981) and its good article review respectively. 12george1 was also the first person to score in 2012 and 2013.
 * scored the first ITN points for 2014 North American polar vortex.
 * scored points for an early good topic, finishing off Featured topics/She Wolf.
 * scored the first bonus points of the competition, for his work on Typhoon Vera.
 * has scored the highest number of bonus points for a single article, for the high-importance Jurassic Park (film).

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Press template addition to Monckton talk page
Please Advise. Thanks. Anastrophe (talk) 22:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Hamidrezaglx
Hello Jinkinson. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Hamidrezaglx, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:38, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mitch Feierstein
Mitch Feierstein has columns in two of the biggest newspapers in the UK, the Daily Mail and The Independent, and is a regular media commentator on shows like the Keiser Report. His book has been published by a major publisher, and translated int: See: Articles for deletion/Mitch Feierstein. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)o a range of languages. He's appeared at Parliamentary committees as an expert. Seems to me a valid candidate for a wikipedia entry.Drknowledge2707 (talk) 06:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

See: Articles for deletion/Mitch Feierstein. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 12:19, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of Christa Wells Stub Page
Hello!

I am just starting out on Wikipedia and I wanted to add an artist to the collection. I'm trying to use other templates in order to make this page conform to other pages that are similar. Should I publish the primary page first and then create stubs that are linked back to the home page?

springchicken Springchicken1985 (talk) 17:28, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

New article for Baring Asset Management
Hi Jinkinson, first of all a big thank you for your revision and acceptance of the new article for Baring Asset Management. I really appreciate your approval. Unfortunately, I've spotted a typo in the company's name - it's 'Baring Asset Management' not 'Barings Asset Management'. Could you please correct it? There could be a tech issue with this as the relevant link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baring_Asset_Management is currently redirected to the Mass Mutual article. Please let me know if you can help. Many thanks, Kat Kt1502 (talk) 18:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. However, if you want to move the article to the new title (without the 's'), you will need to go to WP:RM/TR and request it there. I am not an admin and therefore can't delete the redirect you want to move the page to, but you will be much more likely to get assistance there. Jinkinson   talk to me  19:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Many thanks for the tip. I had a feeling this was not going to be straight forward. I'll make a request on the page you mentioned above. Thanks again. Kat Kt1502 (talk) 19:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * A More Perfect Union (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to The Liberator


 * Robert Baratz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Frontline

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Set Yourself Free) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Set Yourself Free, Jinkinson!

Wikipedia editor Wurstmaster just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Hi! I just reviewed the page Set Yourself Free that you created. Try to help keep it updated as more information is available, because this is a still-'trending' video. Thanks! Wurstmaster (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)"

To reply, leave a comment on Wurstmaster's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Your GA nomination of Autism omnibus trial
The article Autism omnibus trial you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Autism omnibus trial for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. GregJackP  Boomer!   17:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Tim Ball
Hi! You may want to look here and consider a DRV or restoring the article. Yopienso (talk) 21:25, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

I think you have done an excellent job and the Tim Ball article is ready to move to the main space. There is no point in waiting until it is perfect, because no article is ever perfect, and in main space many more people will be able to edit it and continue to improve it. Thanks for your work! JD Lambert(T 23:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Ferenc Miskolczi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ferenc Miskolczi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ferenc Miskolczi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. IRWolfie- (talk) 01:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Marshall Shepherd
He was not born in 1975...he was born in late 1969. He was three years ahead of me at FSU, and I'm 41. We are three years apart in age. He's a smart guy, but he's not Dougie Howser, M.D. or Sheldon Cooper. He received his BS in 1991. I alerted him to the faulty info on that website...hopefully he can get it fixed. =) Thegreatdr (talk) 01:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Good call. I guess even major universities can make mistakes sometimes. Also, should I add you as a connected contributor on the talk page, since you seem to know him very well and be in regular communication with him? Jinkinson   talk to me  02:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm in some communication with Marshall, yeah. By wikipedia's definition of the term, yes.  I haven't run across that term before  Thegreatdr (talk) 03:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for José Salvador Alvarenga
The DYK project (nominate) 23:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Timothy Ball for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timothy Ball is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Timothy Ball & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. IRWolfie- (talk) 00:00, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:59, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teenage Time Killer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supergroup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

AfD for Willy Monfret
An article that you either edited or previously proposed for deletion has been nominated for deletion at Articles for deletion/Willy Monfret. Due to lack of discussion the article has now been relisted twice. If you have a chance could you please stop by and weigh in on the deletion debate. —    Bill W.     (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 13:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Brigade Group (Developer)
Why this article is not of importance.. Its a public limited company in india and one of the leading firms in the country in the field of real estate. If its lacks of sources or reference.. please let me know. This article is under progress so please let me know after checking the article again. Thank You !! Sayowais (talk) Owais 17:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Butt slivers
Hi, I hope I didn't come across as PITA; I wasn't comfy fixing it myself since I have not read the RS. The revision works just fine for me, grammar-wise. Thanks for fixing, NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:28, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi, I would prefer you not mention me by name in edit summaries. Twice the last few days your edit summaries come across like "Beats me what NAEG's problem is, maybe he'll be ok with this one. Sheesh."  The most recent example is this one. Instead, please describe the nature of your edit and leave me out of it. Thanks. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 07:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * All right, sorry if I came across as rude. Jinkinson   talk to me  15:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * No prob & thanks NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 15:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Global warming hiatus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cherry-picking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive
 Hello Jinkinson:

WikiProject AFC is holding a  month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Posted by on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 February newsletter
And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:


 * , a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
 * , a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
 * , another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).

Other competitors of note include:


 * , who helped take Thirty Flights of Loving through good article candidates and featured article candidates, claiming the first first featured article of the competition.
 * , who claimed the first featured list of the competition with Natalia Kills discography.
 * , who takes the title of the contributor awarded the highest bonus point multiplier (resulting in the highest scoring article) of the competition so far. Her high-importance salamander, now a good article, scored 108 points.

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement warning: Climate change
Please announce any new scientists that you add to List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming on the article talk page. It would be more productive to discuss them first but at least provide notice on talk and your reasons for adding them if you choose to edit first. --DHeyward (talk) 22:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Jinkinson, I have no problem with eds adding scientists along with RSs per conventional BRD protocol, ie waiting for the R to happen before initiating talk. I also don't see harm in D's personal request to talk first nor his alerting you about DS.  But In my view combining them in a single edit gives an impression that not honoring his personal pref re adding new nerds might be sanction able, which is not at all how I understand the DS system.   in sum, we have had disagreements and I appreciate your attention to the process.  as for D's request I don't care either way, personally.NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 12:20, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Murry Salby


A tag has been placed on Murry Salby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DHeyward (talk) 23:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Murry Salby


The article Murry Salby has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable academic/scientis. A7 was rejected but with no notability argument.  There appears to be below threshold without any peer reviewed articles cited or noteworthy contributions.  Article focuses on the negative aspect that he was fired because of failing to perform academic duties.  It fails on multiple levels including NN, attack page, etc.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DHeyward (talk) 01:22, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Robert Mayhew (curler)
Hello Jinkinson, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Robert Mayhew (curler), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: the named events are a sufficient claim of importance to deny A7 (but probably not AfD). You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Larry Vardiman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Heritage College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, 10.4.0.34 (talk) 09:06, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Passive smoking, non-MedRS?
Your | Medref tagging edit on Passive smoking seems unjustified, as I understand the MedRS requirements. Could you raise more specific concerns on the talk page please. RDBrown (talk) 01:53, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Dr James confirmed your judgment of the two refs, tagging immediately above them with a primary source comment would have made that clear (if that worked). ... I didn't see a better tag to use when I looked at the templates. RDBrown (talk) 12:40, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Precious
  models

Thank you for quality articles on subjects as various as biogrophies of researchers, scientific journalsand music, including Diane Harper and Animal models of autism, for patrolling new pages and your informative user infobox, for, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

International College Notable Alumni
Faysal Ruwayha is a graduate of International College & was a Project Controller for the United nations for 23 years, in charge of improving all aspects of rural living standards in North & South Yemen, Lebanon, Syria & Jordan. Some projects included the financing of rural roads, schools, clinics, etc. The components of each project addressed the immediate needs of women, men & children which included starting fisheries, growing crops, teaching people how to raise poultry. He met with the impoverished individuals face to face & traveled to Washington, D.C., New York City, Rome, Italy & other destinations in order to secure the funding to provide the basic necessities that most people take for granted such as water, electricity & roads.

I would like to state that the above info is very important as Mr. Ruwayha has helped the world greatly. Please let me know how this may be added under notable alumni.

Most respectfully, Seekofjustice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seekerofjustice (talk • contribs) 18:47, 10 March 2014 (UTC)


 * It may well be true that Ruwayha has done many helpful and altruistic things. However, this is not sufficient to justify having a Wikipedia article about him--for that you would need coverage in independent reliable sources (see WP:BIO). Also see WP:NOBLE for more about how someone doing many generous things doesn't necessarily mean they should have a page on Wikipedia.

Also, you can't add him under notable alumni until you have demonstrated that he should have an article as per what I said above. Jinkinson  talk to me  18:53, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Salby background content
Hi, I certainly needed background overview to help explain what his work was about. Sometimes Wikipedia articles have a "___ for dummies" explanation and I was looking to emulate that spirit. Trying to summarize a complex field in a few paragraphs. Sportfan5000 (talk) 23:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Okay, I guess that might make sense if the "Background" section contained more than one sentence about Salby's actual research, appended to a huge chunk of science-y stuff which covers pretty much every possible atmospheric science-related topic there is. If you are sure that a background section is needed here, you should, in my opinion, whittle it down to stuff that actually pertains to Salby's research and leave out as much else as possible. Jinkinson   talk to me  23:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Well that's in process, as it will take some time to find experts who will help work through his dozens of papers, determine which are most cited/significant, then write it all up. I'm hoping that will happen, but who knows when. Sportfan5000 (talk) 00:43, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Jorge Azar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jorge Azar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jorge Azar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JNW (talk) 13:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Okay... So why are you telling me this? Jinkinson  talk to me  13:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)


 * You prodded this in January. It's standard practice to inform editors who have been involved in an article when there's an AfD discussion for that article. JNW (talk) 14:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Alright, I guess that makes sense, but only if your definition of "involved" is much broader than mine--I consider "involved" to mean that the user either created the article or wrote a significant chunk of its content. In other words, just tagging a page doesn't indicate that you care about its subject. Jinkinson   talk to me  14:40, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

You have repeatedly removed my edit to the page on Kary Mullis, in which I provide links for his rebuttal to comments on his Wiki page. Why don't you want readers to have access to his side of the story and make up their own minds? This seems un-scientific and downright denialist to prevent "the accused" to defend himself. If you disagree with the man or his views that is your right, but he should have an opportunity to defend himself against slander on his own Wiki page. If you continue to remove my edit I will report you for vandalism, but I would be very interested in your rationale for removing my posts considering you appear to be active and enthusiastic about Wikepedia as a medium for the exchange of ideas. (talk)


 * Wait a minute. Did you make the IP's edit above while logged out? Jinkinson   talk to me  02:05, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Autism omnibus
I see you changed the article title and concentrated on Cedillo, the only problem with this is the other 2 cases listed under decisions seem to appear from nowhere. This needs to be rewritten to at least explain that the other 2 cases were part of 3 overall. I know where they came from but to the uninitiated it's out of left field. --Daffydavid (talk) 00:09, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:SpringerOpen academic journals
Category:SpringerOpen academic journals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 15:35, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Peanut butter test for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peanut butter test is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Peanut butter test until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Page Merge
Hi Jinkinson. Re: your proposal for a page merge made back in January: I agree and think it's about time to make the merge. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 20:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

My apologies
Sorry about that I didn't mean you in my comment over at Diane Harper. --Daffydavid (talk) 04:29, 18 March 2014 (UTC)