User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive 17

Nomination of Lukewarmer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lukewarmer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lukewarmer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sorry, but in my view there are insufficient sources congealing around a common meaning of this neologism. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 13:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Per WP:MEDRS
We typically use only high quality secondary sources, such as review articles, for major topics. If you need help finding these or are unsure what they are drop me a note and I will be happy to explain further. Best. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:18, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * This is more or less a news story Peanut_butter_test based on a primary source and a couple of popular press pieces. I do not think it is notable yet. Sorry... Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:27, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * No, no, no, I already knew that. I decided to, as per WP:BOLD, just add it to Alzheimer's disease myself because I wanted people to notice the page (mission accomplished, I guess). I justified the violation of MEDRS you pointed out above because I saw that that section also relied on a number of news stories and primary sources (particularly the stuff about cerebrospinal fluid), so I reasoned that if other stuff had been added to the article that flouted MEDRS and hadn't been removed, then my addition would not be reverted either. Jinkinson   talk to me  03:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * AD is in need of an update. It is on my list :-) Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sallie Baliunas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CFC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Stay constructive
Hi, I reverted part of your talk page comment pursuant to WP:TPO that was probably in a moment of dismay. We all have such moments. Please keep it constructive. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Someone once said "We teach best what we most need to learn! I edited my own also.  If you wish to strike the strikeout and my small case in my comment, feel free. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:45, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Well now you know. Anyone who knows me in real life will tell you: I overreact hugely whenever someone--well, not exactly "insults" me, just says something negative about me, such as, oh, I don't know, that the redirect I created was done "in GF but little knowledge." In fact, I'm crying as I type this, though this is partly due to real-world issues. Thanks for apologizing, though. Jinkinson   talk to me  19:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Grayson Bruce


The article Grayson Bruce has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * BLP, who is also a minor, arguably "notable" for only one event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thargor Orlando (talk) 13:11, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

A1
Hey, Jinkinson, I've just declined an A1 tag you placed on an article. A1 is only for articles that have so little content that it is impossible to tell what the article is actually about, but this article (Church of God Rayos de Esperanza (Harrisonburg, Virginia, Pastor: Angel Echegoyen - Spanish Language)) is pretty clear about what its subject is. Also, in passing, it's recommended to give articles time before placing A1 or A3 (no content) tags on them, in case the author is still working on them; 10-15 minutes is generally the recommended minimum. As far as this article goes, it certainly doesn't seem to be notable at all, but as it doesn't fit any CSD criteria, it's probably best to use other means, like PROD or AFD. Thanks, Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 17:27, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You tagged The Mione Formation with WP:CSD. The tag applies, but you tagged it only three minutes after its creation. Please don't do that again (see above).--Bbb23 (talk) 17:22, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, sorry. I'll try to wait 10 minutes next time, I hope that's sufficient. Jinkinson   talk to me  17:26, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 10 minutes is the minimum per the footnote. If it makes you feel any better, an administrator deleted the article prematurely, so you're not alone. :-) --Bbb23 (talk) 18:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for George H. Taylor
Thank you Victuallers (talk) 00:27, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:14, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 conspiracy theories for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 conspiracy theories is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 conspiracy theories until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article..Snood1205 (talk) 22:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

I usually don't respond to ECHO thanks (not because of any problem with ECHO, just because it would take a lot of time to do so), but this is one where I will say "you're welcome". I originally intended just to have my say and go, but when I saw the bad IDONTLIKEIT logic that seemed to be carrying the day, I decided to stand up. Cripes ... back in my day (like, 2005 or so), when we ganged up on an article we were trying to delete we at least knew policy better than that. Or could pretend we did. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=599879713 your edit] to Injury may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:52, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * . An injury is caused by physical harm. { dead link|date=March 2014}

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=601418040 your edit] to Robert Balling may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * American Scientist. Reviewer John Firor argued that the book "does not fulfill" its claim on the dust jacket that global warming predictions are "simply wrong", that Michaels and

Disambiguation link notification for March 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of health scares (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to National Research Council


 * List of online encyclopedias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Internet phenomena

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

eBook
Hello. I've been following the article that you created (Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 conspiracy theories) and came across this (free) eBook that might be useful. I haven't downloaded it, so cannot comment on its content, but presumably it could have useful sources. I didn't want to spam the article talk page with this link, so I decided to spam you instead. → 9 Conspiracy Theories About Malaysia Airlines Flight 370  ~E:71.20.250.51 (talk) 20:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC) (P.s., it looks to me like the article will not be deleted, the pro-delete arguments are fading away)

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Grayson Bruce for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grayson Bruce is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Grayson Bruce until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thargor Orlando (talk) 14:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

AFD question
Regarding this, I was just following the instructions on the WP:AFD page and I probably messed up somewhere; do you know how to fix it? Thanks. Yobol (talk) 21:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, and I just did it. The new nom is at Articles for deletion/Patrick McKeown (2nd nomination). You're welcome. Jinkinson   talk to me  21:55, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Yobol (talk) 03:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Next time, don't forget to fix the AfD log page and the article tag too! ansh666 10:38, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of 2014 Boston Brownstone Fire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Boston Brownstone Fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2014 Boston Brownstone Fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stephen 02:31, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Bosnian article
I see another admin deleted it - and salted it. I was hoping that would happen; it seemed more than mean to edit war one-on-one with the delete button, especially if the person doesn't understand us. Hopefully they will now find their way to the appropriate place. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 March newsletter
A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato. , who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 22:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Cheryl Williams (Character) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cheryl Williams (Character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cheryl Williams (Character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. G S Palmer (talk) 12:40, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Wales semi-retired or retired?
See diff. QuackGuru ( talk ) 18:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bonnie S. Dunbar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

ITN credit
ThaddeusB (talk) 01:20, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Adoption
Hi Jinkinson,

I want to be adopted in Wikipedia, would you please consider adopting me?

I have been mostly inactive on Wikipedia, I am not sure "how to go about" being more familiar with Wikipedia editing. I would be grateful if you can show me the way!

Regards, Jyoti

Jyoti (talk) 17:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Okay, I guess I'd be willing to. Since there's apparently no official thing to do to adopt someone, I guess I have now adopted you. I guess you can ask me anything you want (about Wikipedia of course). Jinkinson   talk to me  21:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Humm. That is interesting! :-) How about you give me a article of your choice to work on and guide me through it while I make not-correct actions? Jyoti (talk) 22:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I have a better idea: you should go on Special:NewPagesFeed and try to either cleanup or nominate for speedy deletion as many articles as you can. Of course this assumes you know what the criteria are; if you don't read up on them before doing so. Jinkinson   talk to me  23:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Okay. Will start with that. I live in India (IST timezone). There will be plenty of time between your response and my edits. :-)Jyoti (talk) 23:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, I have been reviewing from Special:NewPagesFeed, it is helping -- thank you. I need your advise how to handle this situation: if someone malevolently reverts my edit and I do not want to revert it again (to avoid edit war) but force him/her to discuss it in talk page while having my edits reinstated how do I do that? Assuming that my edit summary was descriptive, the edit was small and it was in compliance (of course, in my view at least). I want the other person to first justify or discuss that change and then only revert it! -- Asking this to avoid edit wars. In the same context -- Can I ask some senior editor/admin to review my edits beforehand? Is there a forum to request my edits for review? Jyoti (talk) 18:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Franklin Regional High School stabbing for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franklin Regional High School stabbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Franklin Regional High School stabbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 21:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

ITN thanks/advice
I wanted to take a moment to thank you for your nominations at ITN. I know you've had a low success rate so far, but I do hope you continue. We certainly could use more stories. In time, you'll get a better feel for what will get support and what won't - and there are plenty of stories that can get support that are never nominated.

As a frequent nominator and long time ITN participant, I wanted to give you a few tips:
 * First, (except for obvious stories) the most important part of getting support is to write a good, persuasive argument as to why something will be posted. It doesn't always work, of course, but at least it prevents lazy opposes from people who don't immediately grasp why a story should be posted and don't care to find out.  When you write snarky/frustrated comments, you aren't doing yourself any favors.  It is much easier to win an argument by being nice than combative.
 * Second, if you want to truly lower the standards of ITN (a noble goal), I suggest you also take the time to comment on/support other people's nominations. You aren't going to win the battle with one stab, but overtime you can gently persuade people to change incrementally.
 * Third, as a small point, I recommend added your nominations to the current events portal (the box at the top of the day) at the same time as you nominate them. It takes minimal effort and allows at least some exposure to the story.  (Portal:Current Events is link to from the the main page ITN template so gets good views.)
 * Finally, keep at it. My first crusade was to get more science published. Nowadays, science stories have a pretty easy time of it.  Then I spent years trying to get more appreciation of "cultural impact", which appears to be starting to work.  Now I am working on getting more acceptance for business stories.  I haven't had any success there yet, but I will keep at it and hope to make progress, because if I don't no one will.

--ThaddeusB (talk) 02:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Australian paradox
Hello! Your submission of Australian paradox at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:47, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * please noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo why why why Kurdistantolive (talk) 02:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * There, there. It'll be alright. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Your comment at Articles for deletion/Franklin Regional High School stabbing
Hi. I see from your biographical info here that you are a college student. Thanks for being a Wikipedia editor. College takes a lot of time and dedication and I am glad you find the time to edit Wikipedia. Students have access to research material that us common citizens do not have and that is a valuable resource.

That being said, and by the way, truly meant, I fond your comment regarding Sandy Hook at the above discussion way off base. At best, a red herring, at worst, a lack of good faith. This is what I mean:

Franklin

 * Perp
 * Minor


 * Location
 * The high school the perp attended


 * Weapon
 * Knives


 * Casualties
 * Approx 20 wounded, only one with a potentially life threatening wound and he is improving.


 * Sociatal effects
 * The school may get metal detectors?


 * Life of the story
 * Remains to be seen, but there really is not much more to talk about so I would be highly surprised if it lasts past today.

Sandy Hook

 * Perp
 * Adult


 * Locaation
 * A most likely random elemntary school


 * Weapon
 * Guns


 * Casualties
 * 27 dead on the scene, plus his mommy.


 * Sociatal effects
 * Renewed nationwide interest in gun control.


 * Life of the story
 * Still being talked about today (witness your comment)

As I have shown, there is very little similarity.

Even from looking at the policies regarding the coverage of crime (WP:N/CA, WP:BREAKING, WP:RAPID), it is apparent that there are several schools of thought on how to cover breaking events ln Wkipedia. I favor waiting (in all but the most extreme cases such as Sandy Hook, which this isn't) until we have a clear picture of what has happened and what it will mean. It appears you don't, and that is just fine. Just realize that implying bad faith in AfD discussions does nothing to further intellegent exchange of opinion and neither does throwing out red herrings.

You may be happy to know that I have asked the AfD be closed as a snow. Good luck on your upcoming finals and again, thank you for being a Wikipedia editor. Happy editing! John from Idegon (talk) 21:46, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Australian paradox
The DYK project (nominate) 10:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

ITN credit
ThaddeusB (talk) 21:58, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of New Gods (Withered Hand album)


A tag has been placed on New Gods (Withered Hand album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. G S Palmer (talk) 17:31, 13 April 2014 (UTC) Never mind - I just got a note from Bbb23 pointing out how my nomination was wrong. Sorry about that! G S Palmer (talk) 17:35, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks,, very decent of you.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:38, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Acayucan bus crash


The article Acayucan bus crash has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NEVENT and WP:NOT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. M ASEM (t) 19:23, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Acayucan bus crash for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Acayucan bus crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Acayucan bus crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. M ASEM (t) 20:31, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

IBCPirates
Heya! I'm IBCPirates, I saw you @ the teahouse and I have a question, hoping you could answer it. IBCPirates (talk) 22:50, 16 April 2014 (UTC)IBCPirates

Futanari Page
Why are you protecting Niabot's image? It is needlessly pornographic, adds very little to the article, and makes the page look unprofessional. He only protects it because he is personally attached to it. 70.112.2.185 (talk) 13:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC) I agree, 70.112.2.185. That image is unnessecary and why hasn't it been removed yet? It's disgusting! IBCPirates (talk) 23:01, 16 April 2014 (UTC)IBCPirates
 * I don't like it either. However, Wikipedia is not censored and a lot of discussion has gone into the debate over whether this image should be there. If you want it to be removed go to the talk page and make your case there. Also, see WP:NPA. Jinkinson   talk to me  14:00, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * After a certain point someone needs to step in and stop people from adding needless graphic content to pages, even if others agree. Letting the article's state be dictated by whoever spends the most time arguing just isn't a viable path. 70.112.2.185 (talk) 00:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of Wikipedia controversies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Macon County


 * Suzanne Goldenberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Environment

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Kary Mullis
You have repeatedly removed information provided in rebuttal of charges against Nobel Laureate Kary Mullis and have insisted on slandering him without providing his alternative explanation or room for rebuttal. This is in direct opposition to the central purpose of Wikepedia, which is to provide an open-source conduit for a diversity of views, not a back-and-forth sniping and vandalism/reprisal cycle. Please do not continue to act in such a malicious manner. You do a disservice to the community and to science by being a knee-jerk denialist instead of allowing people to make up their own minds after being exposed to the relevant arguments. Please respond... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjdavison 1 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject!
Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.
 * Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
 * You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with   with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
 * You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
 * We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
 * Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
 * Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
 * To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
 * To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
 * You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.
 * You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.
 * You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.

Hoping for your cooperation!  D ip ta ns hu Talk 12:37, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sleeping in the Aviary (2) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sleeping in the Aviary (2), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Query re access
Hi Jinkinson, just a question for you that your comments made me wonder: do you generally have access to the full text of the journal articles we are discussing? NW ( Talk ) 15:50, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, I do (being on a college campus and all). Any particular reason you're asking? Jinkinson   talk to me  15:53, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I was just going to extend an offer to share any that you didn't have access to in case that you didn't (it gets pretty tough to edit on these articles without access), but I am glad to see that it isn't necessary. NW ( Talk ) 16:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Administrators (Wikipedia)
Materialscientist (talk) 10:13, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Interesting article - I note that the term bureaucrat is undefined in the article, perhaps you might give a quick explanation for unfamiliar readers. – xeno talk 13:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your various contributions to wp-land (",)  99.119.130.31 (talk) 07:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

ITN credit
ThaddeusB (talk) 17:18, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Article
Have trimmed the article. Have a read of the discussion here  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 21:54, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Craig D. Idso, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Front Page Magazine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=607694546 your edit] to The Bundles (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * fall[ing on] just the right side of twee - think late-period Velvet Underground if Mo Tucker had had equal billing to Lou Reed." {{cite web | url=http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-

Trout
Re: this, may want to check ITN on the main page... ;) Connormah (talk) 00:42, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Repost of Category:Eponymous debut albums
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 23:04, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Wonderlick
Hello! Your submission of Wonderlick at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! v/r - TP 01:30, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Provided linked references for Mary Lou Ridinger article
Sorry Jinkinson, I'm a noob.. Refs posted now.

Dgbau (talk) 17:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Films about Jesus
Hi. You've just created Category:Films about Jesus but perhaps you're not aware of the existing categories Category:Portrayals of Jesus in film and Category:Biographical films about Jesus? It seems this new category duplicates these categories. Tassedethe (talk) 00:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC)


 * No, I wasn't until just now. I tried searching for one but I didn't see any, probably b/c I wasn't sure what the cat name would start with. I guess I should redirect the one I created to one of the older ones, which I intend to do soon. (However an IP has been going around adding pages to it, which doesn't help). Jinkinson   talk to me  00:12, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Robert Vahey
Hello Jinkinson. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Robert Vahey, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Passes WP:A7, but may well be deleted in an WP:AfD discussion - probably best to go through that process. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 12:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Sketch (software)
Hello Jinkinson. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sketch (software), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Probably not notable, but A7 does not apply to desktop software. Thank you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:28, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I have however PRODed it since it lacks notability. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:43, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Menya, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Electronic and M.I.A. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Wonderlick
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve We Will Not Harm You
Hi, I'm Akifumii. Jinkinson, thanks for creating We Will Not Harm You!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. If you could add a few more sections to this article, that would be great.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Akifumii Talk 22:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for Your Input
The recommendations in FAKEARTICLES specifically allow what I am doing. To avoid any misunderstanding of my intent, I added an explanation to my User Offit Talk page and will do the same as I create User pages for other projects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSEEGGilbert (talk • contribs) 02:23, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Adopt a user suggestion
Hi there, I saw you were currently accepting adoptees. I was wondering if you'd be willing to adopt me? I do a lot of anti-vandal work as well as patrol new pages and I think that you adopting me would be a good idea. I've got this page watchlisted, so to keep the conversation in one place, please reply here. Cheers! --Lixxx235 (talk) 02:16, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok, sure. Ask me anything, just do it here because otherwise I probably won't know you've asked it. Jinkinson   talk to me  02:31, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok, I guess could you review my edits? I'm not sure if I really need to get adopted anymore, because I got granted rollback rights and I'm pretty sure that means I haven't been making any inappropriate edits or anything. --Lixxx235 (talk) 00:40, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

ITN credit
ThaddeusB (talk) 01:56, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at WT:MED
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Please read . Search for "at least 3". It is not just NICE in the UK but also all the US medical organizations. This is why we never allow popular press. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:18, 21 May 2014 (UTC)