User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive 20

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. And if you wanted to be nomm'd for adminship, ask away and I'll be pleased to do it. Otherwise, happy editing!  Wifione  Message 03:46, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Zināt. Raudāt. Dziedāt.
Hi. I have declined your speedy deletion nomination - WP:CSD only applies if the artist has no article. Raman Jaraš has one, now, though he didn't when you tagged the article. Whether he's notable is another question... Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:44, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Rebutal
This is the full rebutal  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 18:04, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

William Adlam
I removed your reference, because it can't be the same man, the dates are wrong, see note on talk page. It might be his grandson, if he existed. This may not be a hoax, perhaps based on private knowledge of family history; but I think it will have to go to AfD as failing WP:V. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Having trouble
Hello! I am having trouble linking pages and adding content. I'm not a technical person, so this is a bit difficult for me. I'm sorry if I'm screwing this up, but I keep getting sent to pages of text...and I'm not really sure how to get past some of these issues. Can you take a look and offer some guidance please. ANY help will be appreciated!

Jbellmetal (talk) 00:26, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Exactly what is your problem? Do you mean the messages being placed on your talk page? In that case, the problem is that you are creating pages on things that do not have coverage in reliable sources and therefore are not notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. See WP:Notability as well as the book guideline I linked to on Scattered Thoughts from my Broken Brain. If you don't add reliable sources to the pages you created they will, unfortunately, be deleted. Everymorning   talk  00:33, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Mohamed Alaa
How does an article on Mohamed Alaa come back when it was deleted with very good reasons before? Can a newbie create an article about himself twice, without any other contributions? Can he be referred to someone who can try to lead him to good behavior, or alternatively, have him blocked? Incidentally, thank you for your good work on this and like situations.--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:41, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Posting messages on my talk page
Please read the top of my talk page before posting messages. Dinosaur Fan (talk) 11:15, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Voting
Thank you for voting "keep" at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Reliability_theory_of_aging_and_longevity

You can see the origins for this voting at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Leonid_Gavrilov

and express your opinion there too.

Thanks!

--- 173.61.107.132 (talk) 00:05, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Early Merry Christmas!
  "And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,   I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.  For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."  Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)  Anastasia &#91;Missionedit&#93; (talk)is wishing you a Merry Christmas. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

~ Anastasia &#91;Missionedit&#93; (talk) 03:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Elsevier
Hi Everymorning, could you please indicate in your application which stream(s) you are most interested in? Nikkimaria (talk) 00:09, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Everymorning   talk  00:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Prodding / deleting
Greetings. I was about to try my first PROD on the self-published e-book Scattered Thoughts from my Broken Brain, when looking over the article history showed that you had already prodded it once, and the tag was removed with the comment "guy's won 2 awards a total of 4 times". Since these alleged awards only turn up on Google in the context of the self-publishing author's own promotional materials, I was wondering if I shouldn't try my first AfD instead. Unless you'd rather do the honours? --Andreas Philopater (talk) 00:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * No, you can go ahead and start the AFD. You're probably right about the book's notability (and the author's), since those awards do only show up on self-published sources/social media. Everymorning   talk  00:36, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Please see Articles for deletion/Scattered Thoughts from my Broken Brain. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 01:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

criteria for speedy deletion Editions Musica Ferrum
Hi. The way I read arguments for speedy removal do not apply.

It said: "This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software, or other creative works." In the case of a publishing house (including publishing educational works) it is pretty hard to distinguish between the organisation and its output. Its very name is the output, it is about the creative works. I think the goal of A7 is not to have bogus articles about pets and not-so-important clubs and stuff, but a publisher that can be bought at amazon and jwpepper, doesn't qualify for that. Jrcramer (talk) 16:45, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Pelretin
Hi. Can you explain your connection with User:A8v and articles about Pelretin. It might save me doing some unnecessary further research. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:50, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I replied on your talk page. Everymorning   talk  14:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Infectious disease journals
Hi, almost all microbiology journals will, at least some of the time, cover infectious diseases. Given that, what's the difference between the category "Microbiology journals" and the cat "Infectious disease journals}}? --Randykitty (talk) 23:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I would think that the infectious disease cat should contain journals whose names make it clear that they primarily focus on infectious disease, like Clinical Infectious Diseases, as opposed to just some of the time like "almost all microbiology journals". That seems like a clear enough difference to me, but if you disagree I'm all ears. Everymorning   talk  13:00, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * So the distinction you make is between journals that most of the time focus on infectious disease (but not all of the time, as even these journals will often cover more basic science subjects) and those journals that cover infectious diseases less often. I find that a rather subtle difference and not very useful either. Problematic examples: HIV/AIDS – Research and Palliative Care (title refers to an infectious disease, but also clearly indicates that it is mainly research oriented); AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses (research oriented, but about an infectious agent); Infection, Genetics and Evolution (about infections, but not obviously clinically oriented); and many more in the current Virology and Microbiology journals cats. --Randykitty (talk) 14:11, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Maybe this link could be used as a guide for what journals should be included in this cat and which ones shouldn't. I see what you mean, though. I'll think about it and if I change my mind I'll undo my edits and tag the category for deletion, as I did for Category:Autism journals about a year ago after you posted on my talk page about that as well. Everymorning   talk  14:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, so the AIDS-oriented journals you mentioned above should, in my opinion, go in the category I created for such journals, Category:HIV/AIDS journals. But with regard to "Infection, Genetics and Evolution", I think this shows that you are right and that the distinction between microbiology and infectious disease as fields is a lot fuzzier than I thought it was when I created this category. So I will remove journals from this category and then mark it for deletion. Everymorning   talk  14:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Great! I have deleted the cat. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 15:38, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of user Rfinca1 -
I am the eponymous author of the wiki page - but at 64 and not a techie am limited in my ability to do so. I am referenced on many many Wiki pages and thought i'd make a page for myself. I just updated this page, but did not think it was published. I'll work on this with my daughter over vacation period... many thanks

Rfinca1 (talk) 17:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Possible RfA
Hello! I noticed that you're in Category:Wikipedia administrator hopefuls, and I think that you'd be a great administrator. Would you accept an RfA if I nominated you (possibly with Wifione being a nom or co-nom, as Wifione has showed interest in nominating you)? - Fim atic  (talk &#124; contribs) 17:05, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * In response to what you asked on my talk page; Wifione and I are still discussing it, and we said that we'll probably start it soon, and when your CSD log goes free of errors for a week or 2. I'm still writing a nomination statement, so I'm predicting that the RfA will happen around New Years'. - Fim atic  (talk &#124; contribs) 18:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * In fact, I just checked your CSD log (which has been free of errors for the entire month), so I think that the RfA will start when Wifione and I have finished writing nomination statements. - Fim atic  (talk &#124; contribs) 18:05, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

You've got mail!
- Fim atic  (talk &#124; contribs) 18:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Sony Pictures Entertainment hack
Now that The Interview is shown online alongside limited release, what is the point of keeping opinions about the "cancellation of wide release" anymore? the Interview (2014 film) has one section already skimmed down. Why not this one's own section? --George Ho (talk) 04:15, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I think, personally, that we should cover the important developments in this story, and this includes the cancellation. Does this mean we should cover the reaction to the cancellation too? I think we should include some of these reactions, but only the important ones (like Obama's). Everymorning   talk  17:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Notability of one important person does not make one's opinions prominent. If you want to retain some opinions, why not scrap out US politicians' opinions (except Obama's), including McCain's? By the way, keep China's and Russia's; they balance with US opinions. --George Ho (talk) 21:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Saint Ilar
Everymorning, I appreciate you coming back to mark the article, but I'm hoping you'll return again.

First, icons aren't noticed unless you place them at the beginning of your review. Second, your review is not complete unless you make it clear which of the hooks have been checked and are approved: the person who eventually promotes this needs to know what's okay and what isn't. If you don't state clearly what is approved, it could easily delay promotion. In fact, since this has been sitting unpromoted since LlywelynII added that tick on December 2, over three weeks, I'll bet that's been the case, and is likely to continue to be so unless you make very clear what's good and what isn't.

I'd like to suggest you add something new below my comment, starting with the tick, and stating which of the hooks you've verified as okay. Thank you for your consideration. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:42, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I have added a comment below yours at the DYK as you asked. Everymorning   talk  03:51, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarifying. I've struck the two hooks you didn't approve and added a duplicate of your tick so its easier for a potential promoter to see. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:00, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Late Merry Christmas!
Dinosaur Fan (talk) 10:16, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year Everymorning!


Happy New Year! Everymorning, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. NorthAmerica1000 10:39, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages. Sent using mass message sender. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from User:Northamerica1000/Mailing list.

DYK for California Proposition 47 (2014)
 Harrias  talk 12:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Neptune Finswimming Club
Hi, please review your decision regarding the page Neptune Finswimming Club. I have expanded the article with more details and references to different resources. Please let me know in case you have any particular suggestions for the article. Thank you Aoleinik (talk) 23:43, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and I have removed my own speedy. There might be a little bit of notability in the article now, but what would be ideal would be independent reliable sources discussing the club in depth, rather than results tables from competitions they participated in. I couldn't find any through a Google search, and in fact there were only 30 Google results in total, so this club doesn't appear to be notable. Maybe I'm missing something, though. Everymorning   talk  23:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for 2014 Cairns child killings
Harrias talk 00:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Metabolically healthy obesity
Harrias talk 00:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Finasteride Edits
Hi Everymorning, Thanks for your input on the finasteride page. I felt I was backed into a corner with several users who were aggressively removing all of my edits but your objective feedback and even supply of an additional source helped bring reason and accuracy to improve the article.Doors22 (talk) 02:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, I guess, though I don't know too much about the issue; I just saw a discussion about it on WT:MED and decided to offer my 2 cents. Everymorning   talk  02:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * To be honest, it is helpful just that you are an objective participant. I have a couple of guys who have been bullying me on there for almost a year and vehemently want to avoid any mention of these specific adverse events in the article.  If you don't mind, would you please take a look again as a new issue has emerged.  The articles currently says the adverse events only apply to the 5mg dose but I have found several meta-studies that demonstrate there are adverse events for finasteride at both doses.  Best, 04:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doors22 (talk • contribs)

Templet:TransgenderBar
Hi Everymorning, You are right this should have been placed in my personal name space. So I have moved it there. Thanks for pointing this out to me. --Devin Murphy (talk) 04:25, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tor Wager, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Insula. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Beyer
Hi, wow, thanks for what you're doing to the Beyer article. It's great.
 * You're welcome. For some reason I am drawn to articles about scientists, especially when there's a lot of work to be done on them. Everymorning   talk  03:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Sony Pictures Entertainment hack
I have trouble writing a hook; can you help me? --George Ho (talk) 06:16, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I have proposed another one there. Everymorning   talk  13:46, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

ITN
I hate being thanked for an oppose. I might switch my vote were the lead made more objective and if there were a paragraph of accolades from living talk-show hosts saying how he had influenced them. I am afraid with the current spate of supports for other RD noms yours may get left out do to the competition anyway. μηδείς (talk) 17:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

RfC: AfC Helper Script access
An RfC has been opened at RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script. You are invited to  comment. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:15, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Homeopathy
Hello Everymorning, Since it appears you are a busy person, I will be curt: I am new to the behind the scenes wiki-pedia world so please don't expect me to know all the nuances.

I think you have an interest in the homeopathy article; if not please don't read any further and disregard this post; no answer is necessary.

In the interest of improving the content by adding an element that is not discussed, I bring up the following for consideration:

Yes, there is no scientific basis for showing that the homeopathic process for selecting ingredients and preparing homeopathic drugs is based on sound reasoning; BUT, if I randomly concoct a large enough sample of homeopathic remedies, there is a finite probability that some of them will actually work. I think this is indeed the case and anyone who states that because there is no basis of science in the homeopathic process, none of the homeopathic drugs can have any efficacy is not exercising logical thought processes. This aspect of the discussion has been left out of the article. I also have not seen it discussed anywhere else; but I think to have a complete and unbiased article something should be said of this.

A CASE IN POINT:

The December issue of the Life Extension Foundation's magazine has a summary of the studies done on the concept that taking Zinc supplements may prevent or speed up the cure of the common cold. Here is a link to the article: <  http://www.lef.org//Magazine/2014/12/Snails-Pace/Page-01  >  The article does present some scienctific studies that do show a cause and effect between Zinc and cold prevention.

If you read the article and delve into the footnotes you will find further sustaining data on how the Zinc ions travel to the sinuses from the mouth. See George Eby's article on the mouth to nose closed electric circuit: <   http://www.researchgate.net/profile/George_Eby/publications  > Eby's article presents a theory with substantiating data to explain how Zinc ions can propagate from a lozenge in the mouth to the nasal passages via an electromotive force that naturally exists in the human body and propels the Zinc ions out of the mouth and into the nasal passages.

THE ABOVE TWO REFERENCES present some evidence from a scientific point of view that Zinc lozenges can and do assist in preventing and curing the common cold. The Zi-cam product is mentioned in the wikepedia article; but not in a positive light. In addition, Life Extension is now marketing a Zinc lozenge as a cold remedy. At the insistence of our daughter, my wife and I have recently experimented with Zi-cam to prevent colds and so far the results appear to be consistent with the allegation that if taken promptly and consistently it works. ALTHOUGH HEAD COLDS ARE NOT USUALLY FATAL, THEY ARE A LARGE NUISANCE TO SOCIETY WITH LOST WORK AND IN GENERAL FEELING BAD FROM THE SYMPTOMS; FROM THAT ASPECT, I BELIEVE THIS TOPIC IS IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO WARRANT INCLUSION IN THE ARTICLE because as the article is currently written it implies that all homeopathic medicines are 100% impotent.

I am not an editor for Wiki-pedia but am hopeful that an editor with an interest in this article will read up on what I have presented above and unless there is good reason to reject this contention, incorporate the substance of this post into the wikipedia article. JPfrmME (talk) 03:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)JPfrmME

DYK for Tor Wager
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emma Sulkowicz


The article Emma Sulkowicz has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article violates WP:NOTSCANDAL, WP:BIO1E, WP:N/CA, and WP:ROUTINE. Because the coverage of this subject matter is indistinguishable from tabloid sensationalism and because the accuser is not notable for any reason beyond her accusations, this article meets the criteria for deletion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ustawa (talk) 00:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

olsonjs444
You posted to my Talk page stating that, in your opinion, my edits to the Marc Morano Wiki page were not "neutral". Please be more specific.

Every edit I had made was carefully supported by detailed references. Your removal of my edits has no such support. So please defend your position.

Your User Page indicates you are a college student, so it is likely you really don't know any science yet, and ought not be so quick to judge whether the edits of an adult are "neutral" or not. I graduated from one of the world's finest institutes of science and engineering, and have more than 40 years experience working in fields related to computer science, wireless telecommunications, satellite manufacturing, solar radiation and plasma physics, and the thermodynamics of energy transfer. I've also spent 15 years studying anthropogenic global warming in my spare time. Unlike you, I have developed the skills, tools, and mental capacity to investigate complex scientific problems over the course of my career, and my successful career in science proves the abilities I've acquired.

Of course, there is no such thing as "neutrality" on Wiki, so I reject your argument outright for removing my edits. In my opinion, the entire Wiki page on Morano had not been neutral until after my edits were added. For example, do you believe it was appropriate for someone to include recognition given (meant as an insult) in a section on "awards" received by Morano? If so, then perhaps you should check you own bias.

If you have no justification for your action, other than your opinion, then let's agree to let Wiki staff judge whether you or I possess more neutrality on this matter. Please rescind your request for removal of my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olsonjs444 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The sources you added (e.g. this blog) were not reliable, and some of the stuff you added was not sourced at all. The edit of yours that stated "the criticism leveled at Morano was originally made by Andrew Revkin, another left-wing journalist who has written for Time Magazine in the USA." is problematic as well because it appears to be original research. If you are still convinced that your addition was correct, you can discuss it on the talk page of Morano's article. Everymorning   talk  16:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

The problematic edit you referenced regarding Revkin as the source of the critical comment against Morano can certainly be referenced from a reliable source. No such reference should be necessary for someone familiar with Morano's and/or Revkin's biographical info. Do you have any other objections? If not, then I'll provide the reliable reference on Revkin and expect you to reverse your edits. olsonjs444  talk   — Preceding undated comment added 06:44, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Belle Knox AFD #2
The second AFD for Belle Knox has been overturned and relisted. As you commented on the original AFD, you may wish to comment on this one as well. As there have been developments and sources created since the time of the original AFD, please review to see if your comments/!vote are the same or may have changed. Gaijin42 (talk)

The Islington
Hello there .. Thank you for reviewing and your interest in "The Islington". I am very new to Wikipedia and need to understand what you need from me in order to prove to you that "The Islington" is one of the most profile Live Music Venues in London. I have referenced sources from The Independent newspaper, one of the biggest daily newspapers in the United Kingdom.

I would have though that would have been proof. Can you let me know - in laymans terms - what you need from me to keep this page active from deletion?

Yours,

Scott.

Bizarre
The source said more than just the following. "A day after the post a website called "Monsanto Collaborator" appeared online which listed the names of scientists and journalists who allegedly collaborate with the bio industry.[17]" The reader won't understand how a separate website is related without explaining the story behind it.

"NOTE: The GLP has been able to confirm that Adams is indeed the mastermind and financier behind the Monsanto Collaborator’s website. The story has now taken an even more bizarre twist, as Adams, facing multiple investigations from law enforcement officials, including the FBI, is now trying to make it appear that not only did he not oversee the project, but that it was a set up by Monsanto in a twisted plot to discredit anti-GMO critics."

I think another sentence can explain it a bit more. I can't think of a way to summarise the bizarre twist. QuackGuru ( talk ) 18:52, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


 * There used to be text in the article about Adams' response to accusations that he was behind the Monsanto Collaborators website, but it was removed by Jytdog. He called it "an endless road of tit for tat." Perhaps you should ask him whether he thinks it is a good idea to include information about what Adams was accused of, how he responded to the accusations, etc.  Everymorning   talk  19:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Stuart Maconie
I'm not sure this RfD has been opening in good faith. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Sony Pictures Entertainment hack
Harrias talk 14:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Authority control|VIAF=40543312|LCCN=n89655618
Hi, Just wanted to thank you for your contributions to Fred Cate and to ask a question. What does this do:Authority control|VIAF=40543312|LCCN=n89655618? Thanks in advance. Ottawahitech (talk) 15:14, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not exactly sure. But I've been adding it to bios for more than a year now. Apparently according to WP:VIAF, it "add[s] additional value for the reader." Everymorning   talk  15:34, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Journey to middle earth 2
Hi. You PRODded it, but I think a speedy tag would have been better. For one thing, "fieldray productions" doesn't google. Plus, the name was probably borrowed from "Howard Shore: Creating The Lord of the Rings Symphony: A Composer's Journey Through Middle-earth". Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Do you mean G3 (blatant hoax)? Everymorning   talk  00:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, there is one Google result (besides Wikipedia) for Fieldray Productions. Still, it's possible this is part of the hoax as it's on a free webhosting service.  Everymorning   talk  01:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Blatant hoax or just WP:A7 because who knows, maybe some kids and their handicam have a real, but non-notable picture in the works. I usually reserve WP:A11 for stuff like Strawberry-scented Zebra herds of northern Canada, All aluminum oven mits, or List of balding hedge fund managers on Pluto. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I see it's already been deleted per A11. BTW, I tend to be cautious about tagging things for speedy deletion because sometimes when I do so, other editors remove my tag. Everymorning   talk  13:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

A page that was voted to be a redirect that someone restarted again
So I was looking over my watchlist and clicking on some of the pages, I found this one Doyle (band) which was voted to be a redirect last May to another page but in November someone decided to deleted the redirect and restart the page. I just moved it back to the redirect, what I'm wondering is what is the protocol when someone does that? Given that it was a few months ago that it happened, so yeah. Wgolf (talk) 01:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * You could always ask for the redirect to be protected at WP:RFPP to enforce the AFD outcome. Everymorning   talk  01:49, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks-if it happens again I probably will. Wgolf (talk) 01:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Yoga as
Where you cleared out the non-medrs compliant source? Bladesmulti (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Oops, thanks for pointing that out, I will fix it immediately. Everymorning   talk  15:48, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

2015 Haiti Carnival accident
-- Nakon 00:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Villa Clare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peachtree Road. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs)
The article Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs)
The article Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Dhanish Karthik
Hi Everymorning, you had marked my article Dhanish Karthik for possible deletion due to no sources. I was in the process of adding in reliable sources which I have done now. Please let me know if there are any other issues.

--Nicoleww1985 (talk) 22:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC) Nicole W

Copyright
Hi Everymorning, you tagged the page that I created as a possible infraction of copyright because the content has been copy-pasted from another page. This is text that we created, and I wanted to ask you if we can paste it in both sites, and if so, how do I remove the message. Thank you. laura — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laura.costas (talk • contribs) 15:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * See Donating copyrighted materials. Everymorning   talk  20:10, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
smileguy91 Need to talk? 20:57, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

 * Thanks, I saw your message already, actually. Thanks for the feedback. Everymorning   talk  03:00, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

link
Hi, I have now link it a link that say shi born in amersfoort 1960! Check her website and then klik on biography and klik then full biography!--Maxie1hoi (talk) 09:17, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

references for Lorenza Bonaccorsi page
I inserted references for Lorenza Bonaccorsi page (she is a member of Italian Parliament and president of Democratic Party of Lazio). So can I delete your warning on the page? Thanks Agatino Grillo (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, you can remove the PROD template now that the article has reliable sources. Everymorning   talk  19:04, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Precious again
  models

Thank you for quality articles on subjects as various as biogrophies of researchers, scientific journalsand music, including Diane Harper and Animal models of autism, for patrolling new pages and your informative user infobox, for, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)signature A year ago, you were the 791st recipient of my  Pumpkin Sky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:38, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Helicopter crash
Article needs an infobox - infobox aircraft occurrence. Be prepared for the deletionists, likely to end up at WP:AFD. The better the shape the article is in, the easier it is to assess notability etc. Mjroots (talk) 22:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice. I will add an infobox to the article shortly. Everymorning   talk  22:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 2015 Eglin Air Force Base helicopter crash


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2015 Eglin Air Force Base helicopter crash. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Florida helicopter crash. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Florida helicopter crash – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.  Jim Car ter  15:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Dyslexia
hello Everymorning ...  Blue Rasberry   has passed the GA review article for Dyslexia, however it needs another individual to look at it and then close, I saw your help on Wikipedia med talk page and decided you could help, should there be any additional information needed, references or images I would not hesitate to add them at your request, I thank you for your time, please contact me with any questions, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:42, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks but I don't have much experience doing GARs, so you should probably ask someone else. Everymorning   talk  23:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ubhejane
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 12:03, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Nusenda Credit Union
Hi there Everymorning, I see you took the time to add a reference and categories to a newly created article Nusenda Credit Union. The creator of the article keeps removing the content you added, and has made some comments you might be interested in seeing. The editor seems to think you have some agenda against their organization, when it's quite obvious you came across a new article and only tried to help. I have no idea what the editors problem was with the categories, but I get the feeling they think because it's their organization, that they are the ones to edit it. Sounds like a conflict of interest to me. Cmr08 (talk) 00:43, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up; I have responded on the creator's talk page. Everymorning   talk  00:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)


 * That's good, I was in the middle of writing a comment myself but got the edit conflict. I'll leave it at that for now and see what they have to say. Cmr08 (talk) 00:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Everymorning, it seems like even your attempt to add a better source while also explaining on users talk page about not having anything to do with the paper in question has been completely ignored. The editor removed the reference, as well as other stuff which I reverted but has left another edit summary directed at you accusing you of being an agent of the refered page, and calling your edit spam and needlessly derogatory information. This is getting ridiculous, I read the source you added and it's a newspaper article backing up exactly what the article is saying. It seems to me that they want ownership of the article, and want the article left unsourced. Cmr08 (talk) 22:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi again, I left the editor a comment about stopping the untrue accusations, but editor refuses to retract them. Telling me "They are not untrue accusations. I've researched it thoroughly. You are being misled." The editor wants to meet in person or to telephone them, but that's not happening. I tried to help you here, but I doubt nothing can be said to make the editor understand what's really happening here. Cmr08 (talk) 01:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of I'm not a scientist for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I'm not a scientist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/I'm not a scientist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#8213; Padenton  &#124;&#9742; 18:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)