User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive 23

2010 IBSA World Blind Football Championship
Yes, that's what I meant to do. Attaboy (talk) 22:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Alright, I've just tried to fix it. Everymorning (talk) 22:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks Attaboy (talk) 22:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Agario
Hi it's zacy55 I think I did make a mistake I'm sorry Zacy55 (talk) 12:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * That's okay. Everymorning (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Hornbill MedTech page
Hello, I was wondering if I can view the deleted page Hornbill MedTech so I can use it for reference. I and I investors (talk) 19:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * No I cant show it to you as I am not an administrator. Everymorning (talk) 19:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Duplicate debate
I already added Articles for deletion/Creepypasta (4th nomination) to WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet so there's no need for you to do it again. Blackbombchu (talk) 18:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Well I delsorted it because I didnt see the deletion sorting message in the AFD yet. If you want to remove the AFD from the Internet delsort page feel free to do so. Everymorning (talk) 19:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * How did you add that note in? Did you insert it manually did you do a short cut for it with Twinkle? I thought that note would get added in automatically after I included the debate in WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet. Blackbombchu (talk) 22:40, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Not exactly. The answer is that I use WP:FWDS, which allows you to add the note to the AFD and add the AFD to the deletion sorting subpage in one click. Everymorning (talk) 22:43, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom: You may be interested
Hello, based on past interactions at Glyphosate and elsewhere, I thought you might be interested in the current ArbCom case. The Arbitration Committee is currently inviting comments from any parties that have past experience with the topics, or persons, involved. Jtrevor99 (talk) 22:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not actually that active in this topic area anymore, so I think I'll pass. Everymorning (talk) 23:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Salah Al qadi
Hi there, I'm not sure if you noticed but you tagged Salah Al qadi as WP:A1 about a minute after it was created. I agree that the page will almost certainly not become a proper article and face speedy deletion and I'm sure I don't need to to mention WP:BITE. I just thought I would point out the timing as a friendly reminder. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   12:48, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll try to wait longer in the future, sorry. Everymorning (talk) 12:55, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

More on homeopoathy
Hi, the Homeoapthy preclinical studies reach to 70 references!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Everymorning/Preclinical_homeopathy_studies — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.179.234.109 (talk) 05:46, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Good, but the list has been poorly received at Talk:Homeopathy. It seems MEDRS precludes using them as sources. Oh well. Everymorning (talk) 01:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

New Page Patrol
Please do not patrol pages if you can't be bothered to do the rest of the work. This, Draft:Vionette negretti, to which all you did was add a cat and which which I have now moved to draft space, is hardly an shining example of New Page Patrolling. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I guess I should have fixed up the page more, sorry. Everymorning (talk) 17:51, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Excuse Me
I made the page so it`s not jellyfish — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fun Cake (talk • contribs) 18:26, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:22, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Deletion sorting
Hi Everymorning: Just a note that when performing deletion sorting for schools, the AfD discussion has to be manually added to the Schools delsort page. For whatever reasons, the FWDS script does not automatically add entries to the page. I added the listing for you at the delsort page (diff). Cheers, North America1000 04:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks. Everymorning (talk) 11:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anthony Swerdlow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sutton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Abraham Lilienfeld
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Brian Boxer Wachler
Draft:Brian Boxer Wachler, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Brian Boxer Wachler and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Brian Boxer Wachler during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  DGG ( talk ) 15:53, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Response to question about MfD Edits
MFD edits

Why did you undo my closure of the withdrawn MFD at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Brian Boxer Wachler? Everymorning (talk) 19:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Because you screwed it up and ended up collapsing every single discussion on the main Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion page instead of just Brian Boxer Wachler. You're not an admin and such discussions are supposed to be closed by admins, even if withdrawn. Best leave it to an admin who knows how to close the Brian Boxer Wachler discussion without accidentally collapsing every other discussion on the main MfD page. Mmyers1976 (talk) 19:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Kevin Gorman (Wikipedian)
On his talk page, Kevin seems to agree with people concerned that this article would probably be deleted at AFD, and appears not to really want this article about him. Would you be willing to accept a WP:CSD speedy deletion (only significant author requests deletion) so that he doesn't have to go thru an AFD on an article about himself? People (including Kevin himself) are talking about using WP:PROD, but that usually takes 7 days, and if no one is going to contest it, there's no need for that. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:28, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure, there is some coverage outside of March 2014 (when he was appointed Wikipedian in residence), so this may be enough to get him past the bar of BLP1E.   Also, Kevin has been interviewed by for example the Library Journal, so he doesn't seem to be a low-profile individual, meaning BLP1E may not apply here anyway. So I'm not going to put a G7 tag on the article now, but if you want to nominate it for deletion on Kevin's behalf, feel free to do so. Everymorning (talk) 17:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The thing is, Kevin does not want the article, and it is extraordinarily bad form to write an article about a fellow editor with marginal notability when they don't want it. I am trying to save him the hassle of having an article about him discussed at AFD; if you think about that for a few seconds, I hope you can see how that would be painful.  This does not reflect well on you, please reconsider.  Otherwise, I may just delete it anyway, and you could object to the admittedly out-of-process deletion at WP:DRV.  But it would be better for you, for him, and for me if you reconsider. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll put a G7 template on the article. Everymorning (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. That will, I am confident, avoid a painful AFD. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:49, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Kelly Gissendaner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelly Gissendaner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kelly Gissendaner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:07, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve Kelly Gissendaner
Hi, I'm Kudpung. Everymorning, thanks for creating Kelly Gissendaner!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article ha an issue with its citation system. Yu may wish to address it.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Poo-Pourri


A tag has been placed on Poo-Pourri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zpeopleheart (talk) 21:05, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

hello I ask page protection IETBB
hello I ask page protection IETBB and as an educational article and editors have suffered attacks as Joao Xavier please--Vandertor (talk) 17:53, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Since I am not an admin, I can't protect that page, so you should ask at WP:RFPP if you want it protected. Everymorning (talk) 18:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

ASK your help to contribute in favor of Article
ASK your help to contribute in favor of the article IETBB for being my first article created thank you--Vandertor (talk) 18:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * What exactly do you mean by "in favor of"? If you mean you want me to vote for it to be kept at its AFD then you are committing WP:CANVASSING. I don't speak Portuguese so I don't think I could be of much help as far as expanding the article is concerned. Everymorning (talk) 18:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!


Happy Halloween!

Hello Everymorning: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!   –  North America1000 23:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC) Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message. Sent to users on my mailing list. To opt-out forever, just remove your name.

Adoption
will you adopt me nms642 (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC) Hi Everymorning, looking for someone to adopt me. Do you have time? (Abqwikicontributor (talk) 22:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC))
 * Sure. I see you've asked a bunch of other users the same question, so if others also say yes, you can choose between me and any one of them. Everymorning (talk) 20:12, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

New Companies delsort category
Hi Everymorning: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 16 October 2015 for companies, located at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America1000 16:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

New Disability delsort category
Hi: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 19 October 2015 for Disability-related articles, located at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disability. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America1000 18:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Request
I was wondering if you could possibly comment at Talk:Angie Tribeca Chihciboy (talk) 11:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Hi Everymorning. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Madame tussauds sydney, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. ''Tagged within only 13 minutes of creation. That is bitey. Although it is preferable for articles to be developed in user space or draft first, there is no rule they they 'cannot' be written in mainspace. A simple tage and a friendly message to the creator might have been sufficient. Please note that this is not the first time that concerns have been raised over your patrolling.'' Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes I know people have expressed concerns about me and NPP before. So what is the minimum time to wait to tag a page for speedy deletion? I think previously I had heard it was ten mins. Best, Everymorning (talk) 01:07, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Common sense should really tell you if an article is a work in progress or if the author thinks it's finished already and is not going to come back. You should also read instructions to get the answers to what you need to learn. If you are unable to exercise that level of judgement yet, then the time to wait is about one year until you have sufficient experience to be patrolling pages. Your own creations still do not demonstrate that you know what quality is expected for this encyclopedia. In other words, people who patrol pages should know how to produce them. If you would like to understand more about the problems we are faced with at NPP and why it should only be done by experienced editors, please the the current discussion at WT:NPP. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:37, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * What are the articles I have created that you think "do not demonstrate that [I] know what quality is expected for this encyclopedia."? Everymorning (talk) 14:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry for butting into a private conversation? Just wanted to say that as someone who has for years been exposed to unwanted attention from wp:NPPers, I must say I am surprised to see this user get this type of criticism. I am saying this because this user stands out in my memory as an a rare NPPer that actually listens. What am I missing? Ottawahitech (talk) 13:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Ottawa! You should probably post this message on Kudpung's tp though if you want him to answer. Everymorning (talk) 14:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Everymorning, I wonder if I can pick your brains on a topic I have been curious about for awhile. I know that new page patrolers are encouraged to start their patrol on articles that have been in the pipeline for a while and not those that have been started just moments before. Yet when I check for my own articles I see four articles marked with an exclamation symbol the oldest of which was started in October, while one article which I started yesterday is already marked with a check symbol. I wonder if you an shed some light on this puzzle? - I assume the check mark means it has been patrolled and OK while the exclamation mark means it is suspect? Thanks very much in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 13:36, 8 November 2015 (UTC)please point me
 * I think the exclamation point means the page hasn't been reviewed but the check mark means it has been, or that it was autopatrolled. Everymorning (talk) 16:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks like we agree on the interpretation of the symbols, but I am still unclear on the order in which NPP patrollers go thru the queue of new articles. I have had a flurry of acticity activity on my own new articles which I started today, but there are still two unreviewed articles which I started on October 31 and on Nov 1. Ottawahitech (talk) 16:38, 8 November 2015 (UTC)please notify me
 * Just to let you know in regards to your message I posted a message on user:VQuakr about it and notified user:Kudpung at the time. Ottawahitech (talk) 16:50, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joshua Feuerstein


The article Joshua Feuerstein has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This page is ridiculous. Obviously an autobiography and not even remotely encyclopedic. Perhaps a move to userspace?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JQTriple7 (talk) 05:22, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
JQTriple7 (talk) 00:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Already saw it but thanks anyway. Everymorning (talk) 00:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Jack Robichaux
Hi Everymorning! Realized I've been posting to your Calamondin12 page by mistake. My name is Kim Renfro and I'm a digital culture reporter for Tech Insider. I'm writing about the long-running hoax ever — Jack Robichaux (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jack_Robichaux). Would you have time for a brief phone or email interview? My email is krenfro@techinsider.io and office line is 646-494-4150. Thanks for your time! Kimrrenfro (talk) 18:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC) Kim Renfro
 * Yes, I'd be happy to. If you click the "Email this user" link on the side of the page while looking at this page, you can send me an email with questions you want to ask me. However, I am not the same person as Calamondin12, who seems to have been much more involved in this hoax than I was. Everymorning (talk) 18:40, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scott Gairdner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Anisur Khuda-Bukhsh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anisur Khuda-Bukhsh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Anisur Khuda-Bukhsh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 17:32, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Another reference for your work on Gun Control
I've noticed that you have done some good balanced entries on the Gun Control article. Here is a fairly recent paper you may want to add. http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301409 99.242.108.55 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:27, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you mean to link to the paper? Everymorning (talk) 19:33, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Now that you have done so, I can respond: I know about this study already, but it doesn't look at gun control, but rather gun ownership. If you look thru the history of gun control you'll see I removed a bunch of stuff because it didn't deal with gun control specifically enough IMO. Everymorning (talk) 01:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Fair enough.99.242.108.55 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stewart Wolf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Pacific. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Everymorning: Enjoy the holiday season and upcoming winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America1000 19:02, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Writing about people
Wondering if you could take a look at this article? Noel A. Alpins. They really want an article. Not sure if they are notable. User:DGG what do you think? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Not notable IMO--little if any RS coverage, h-index of 12 on Google Scholar. Everymorning (talk) 01:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * not notable. It's essentially a copyvio from various pages of the CV, so I deleted it. If it reappears, & is not copyvio,  it will need to go to afd. It's not A7 speedy.   DGG ( talk ) 04:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I also nominated the redirect from his method for deletion; see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 December 21  DGG ( talk ) 04:41, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho


Doc James (talk · contribs · email) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to your friends' talk pages.

Thanks for all you have done this year :-) Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 22:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * You're welcome and Merry Christmas to you too! Everymorning (talk) 23:04, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Gratitude
Hello Everymorning, thank you for your editing but am translating from Spanish, greetings and happy holidays. K3v1n2015 (talk) 19:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I think I incorrectly thought that the main language in Argentina was Portuguese, but I seem to have gotten it mixed up with Brazil in that regard. Everymorning (talk) 19:07, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Everymorning!


Happy New Year! Everymorning, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. LesVegas (talk) 15:51, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year

 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

Deleting the article "Andrei Siderski"
Hi, could you please explain why article "Andrei Siderski" was deleted? There were added 4 references for third party resources, including municipal library and online magazines. Thank you.
 * As you can see from the deletion log,  deleted the article recently under WP:G11, meaning he felt it was "unambiguous advertising or promotion". If you don't think this is an accurate characterization of the article, you should ask him. Everymorning (talk) 23:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * It was, every time it was deleted :-) Guy (Help!) 23:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Judy Wood concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Judy Wood, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Tristan Eaton
Has Tristan Eaton been fixed enough to not be deleted? 64.134.64.190 (talk) 06:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Not sure, I haven't looked at all the sources, but the ABC News one doesn't seem to mention Eaton. Everymorning (talk) 06:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You're right. I just deleted the ABC News link. 64.134.64.190 (talk) 06:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Manay Po
Seems the article creator has a huge history of adding films with no references or notability, see Articles for deletion/Manay PoWgolf (talk) 20:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello
I'm wondering why half of the Whitesboro, New York article needs to be dominated with information on the seal when the village's history is about the same size; what I'm wondering is does it need it's own section, or can it be added in under "History...?" Buffaboy talk 00:11, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * IDK, but I split it into its own section because it has gotten such a disproportionate amount of media attention relative to other aspects of the town's history. However, I would understand if you reduced the coverage of this or moved it back into the history section due to RECENTISM concerns. This controversy also extends to the present, which to me means it makes more sense to put it in its own section, as I have done, than keep it in the history section, but I'm fine with you undoing my section split. Best, Everymorning (talk) 01:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Nagin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Research Council. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)