User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive 27

Disambiguation link notification for March 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Indoor and Built Environment
 * added a link pointing to Philip Morris


 * P.U.N.K. Girl
 * added a link pointing to Macmillan


 * Prejudice plus power
 * added a link pointing to Absolutist


 * Rafi Ahmed
 * added a link pointing to Scripps Institute


 * Sweet Pea Atkinson
 * added a link pointing to General Johnson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:Republican Party (United States) websites has been nominated for discussion
Category:Republican Party (United States) websites, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. f eminist  10:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Jaye Muller
Mifter (talk) 00:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robin DiAngelo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Stranger. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Paid?
I think you should answer this question in your archive here. Endercase (talk) 21:48, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Man, that was a while ago. Anyway, I already answered it. Everymorning (talk) 22:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks, just wanted it entered into record after all the stuff going down at the Whopper page, given the wording of your edit there, how experienced you are here, and the slogan-ish feel of your username. Thank you for responding to this. Now it should get recorded in your log and you shouldn't have to deal with it again. Endercase (talk) 23:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jesse Cougle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lutheran High School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Love and Rockets (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Murs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:CollegeHumor people has been nominated for discussion
Category:CollegeHumor people, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Zatz
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In Zatz you listed Mayana Zatz as British. According to her article she is Israeli-born Brazilian. —Anomalocaris (talk) 15:50, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, thanks for fixing it. Everymorning (talk) 16:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

 * please help translate this message into your local language via meta

Thanks again :-) --  Doc James  along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paradoxaholic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dave Schramm. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

NPY
I do not understand why with this edit you did not tag the article for deletion. We don't really have time to double control all reviewers' reviews, but this caught my eye. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:56, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Typically when I'm doing new page patrol I decide whether to tag articles for speedy/PROD. It didn't seem like that article warranted being tagged for either, as there was clearly a credible claim of significance ("one of America's foremost writers and analysts on energy, technology, and foreign affairs.") I also added a link to Martin's MIT Technology Review page for verifiability. Everymorning (talk) 11:31, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Hello ,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just reviews, the  backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

G12 cleanup
Just as an FYI, when cleaning up an article that has been tagged for G12, the history that is a copyvio needs to be deleted via revision deletion after you have fixed the article. You can do that by placing Template:Copyvio-revdel on the article and an administrator will come by later and delete the revisions. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Please, adopt me
Hi,

I am a new editor, and other editors are very mad at me, because I still don't know how to edit correctly. I agree with them that it is very frustrating.

Can you adopt me please? Thank you.Henia Perlman (talk) 20:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll adopt you. Let me know what you need help with. Everymorning (talk) 20:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

BLP Prod on Kriesha Tu
Hi Everymorning, I had to remove a blp prod on the article as it wasn't an valid prod. BLP Prod can only applied if they type of information to verify the existence of person. Unfortunately the article has an external links, which is the first sign that a BLP prod can't applied. If any of the links in External Links sections work, then BLP Prod is not valid. It is also worth doing a search for sources. There is a drive on Wikipedia to address WP:BIAS gender gaps, the lack of women article. I think it is a good idea to look for sources, as they seems to be fair chunk of them which satisfies WP:BIO. If you already know all this, then please ignore. I tend to rabbit on sometimes. scope_creep (talk) 00:35, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Preserving citations
Whenever you delete material from an article, as you did at Voter ID laws in the United States, it is important to examine the material for named references, such as &lt;ref name="RC">

When named references are found, it is important to go into edit mode for the entire article and search for the reference name anywhere in the article. If the name is found anywhere that is not going to be deleted, the definition of the reference must be moved to one of the instances that will remain in the article.

When searching, it is important to search for the name only, since it may be written somewhat differently in different locations, e.g. name="RC" name = RC name=RC. Jc3s5h (talk) 12:26, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Quick CSD tags
Please try to avoid tagging new articles quickly, such as FylthyUnderground, which you tagged a minute after creation. It's best to leave them for 10 minutes unless they are grossly inappropriate (copyright violations, attack pages, etc). This helps ensure we don't bite the newbies or run off someone before they continue developing a promising but currently incomplete article. ~ Rob 13 Talk 16:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of COVFEFE Act


The article COVFEFE Act has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Not assertion of notability in sources provided

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract  ‖ 22:00, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Racial discrimination
Hi I see you blanked a section on racial discrimination in the article on racism and left a brief edit summary explaining that you intend to move the deleted material to a new page. Rather than revert this bold edit, I thought it best to let you finish what you are doing. Suggestion: Could you perhaps leave a brief summary of your intention on the article's talk page so that we have a record of these actions as well as a more detailed explanation which may allow other editors to get involved with what you are doing? Many thanks Edaham (talk) 01:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Abortion–breast_cancer_hypothesis
Hi, doing good work here. Keep it up, FYI I gave up reducing the original section User:RoyBoy/sandbox/ABC history a while back; maybe I'll re-engage soon. One note for your current section, "differential misclassification" has never been demonstrated and if I recall correctly it has been shown to occur roughly the same between case and control ABC subjects. Can't recall specifics right now, pun unintended. - RoyBoy 23:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Law enforcement list split
Do you realize that when you split out List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, you removed the entire paragraph starting with "These lists are incomplete" from all of the sublists which were transcluding it through LST? P p p er y 00:38, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I realized it (I added that paragraph to Police use of deadly force in the United States, the page I split it into). If you want to add that paragraph (or something making the same point about how the lists are incomplete) back to the original page, you're welcome to do so, and I apologize if I removed information that should have stayed on the original page. Everymorning (talk) 01:02, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I was referring to subarticles like List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, January 2015, not the main list you removed content from, but OK. P p p er y 02:41, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Alphabetical order
Please put the review publications in review boxes in alphabetical order. Thanks. --Jennica ✿ / talk 05:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Your edit on the "Abortion-Breast-Cancer Hypothesis" page
Hi there. Your recent edit on the Abortion–breast cancer hypothesis was based on a PRIMARY SOURCE--the well-known Melbye study published in  New England Journal of Medicine . It's a fine study, but still a PRIMARY SOURCE. According to Identifying reliable sources (medicine): "Primary sources should generally not be used for medical content".

Feel free to replace the substance of your edit, which is helpful, if you can find a more appropriate source for it, such as a review or a meta-analysis.

Best wishes, HandsomeMrToad (talk) 07:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject Organized crime

 * Thanks very much for joining the project! North America1000 21:54, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sapiosexual (June 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sapiosexual and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dr Strauss  talk  17:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Vincent Rue
Hi, thank you for your message. I don't understand why you consider that my recent contributions to Vincent Rue don't appear constructive. I think the current information is uncomplete and biased. There should be more contributions to really know this psycotherapist in depth. Regards.Wikicotilla (talk) 00:22, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You should not have copied and pasted/closely paraphrased the stuff you added to Rue's page. See WP:COPYVIO for more about this issue. Also, the sources you added to support your additions were not reliable (see WP:RS and WP:BLP). Everymorning (talk) 02:43, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

One handgun a month law
Not sure why you deleted a dead link that could have been rescued by a quick check on the Wayback Machine. Don't worry, I've fixed it.-- Auric    talk  13:12, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, I did try to find archived copies of it, but I think I used the wrong URL to enter into the Wayback Machine (this one, specifically), and that's why I couldn't find any archived versions of it that worked. Everymorning (talk) 13:15, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Movement Strategy reminder
Hi. You contributed in a previous part of the discussion, so this is just a reminder to you (and any interested talkpagewatchers), that it's the second week of our Movement Strategy Cycle 3 discussion. There's a new topic each week in July, and this week's is: How could we capture the sum of all knowledge when much of it cannot be verified in traditional ways? You can see more details, and suggest solutions or respond to other people's thoughts (from this week and last week) at Wikimedia Strategy 2017. You can also read a summary of discussions that took place in the past week. Cheers. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 03:18, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
 * Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Page Curation/Suggested improvements
 * The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
 * User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
 * User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:
 * Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Jo Carol Pierce
Alex ShihTalk 01:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Addiction Rare in Patients Treated with Narcotics
Hello! Your submission of Addiction Rare in Patients Treated with Narcotics at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:58, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marco Ruggiero


The article Marco Ruggiero has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NBIO/WP:NPROF"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. shoy (reactions) 19:54, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Addiction Rare in Patients Treated with Narcotics
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maple Match


The article Maple Match has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "While the app exists and has been mentioned from various online sources, the mere mention by various news articles does not guarantee sufficient notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hunterm267''Talk 01:46, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I responded to this.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  11:13, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

 * Thanks, you too. Everymorning (talk) 02:29, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
 * Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Speedy deletion nomination of James Allsup


A tag has been placed on James Allsup, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:08, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Mentorship request?
Would like to request mentorship. Is this the right place? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 02:24, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure, if you want me to mentor you. Everymorning (talk) 02:26, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Wow! That was quick! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 02:35, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * So, am I adopted? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:27, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes. Everymorning (talk) 13:21, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay... Where to start? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 05:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

It's up to you; just ask me about something you want me to help you with and I'll try to do so. Everymorning (talk) 13:12, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * How about WP:NPP? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure, what about it do you want help with? I will give you some general advice for new page patrolling: you should wait at least 5 min. after a page is created to tag it for speedy deletion, in case the creator needs to fix the problem that you want to speedy the page for. Also, this section is getting kinda long so I'd like it if you ask me about this on a new section on this page. Everymorning (talk) 02:27, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Bartley-Fox Law
I got inspired tonight and added some content and a bunch of refs to the article. Hope it looks good! Can you add an external link to the full text of the law? Is such a thing available? Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:56, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Bartley-Fox Law
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

WP:NPP
Where would be a good place to start? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:39, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * After you read through the page you linked to in the header of this section, you can start patrolling new pages at Special:NewPagesFeed. Everymorning (talk) 02:30, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * What are the requirements for the right? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:37, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * According to WP:NPPR, they are as follows: "Editors will normally need to have been registered users of the English Wikipedia for at least 90 days, and have made at least 500 not-deleted edits to mainspace. They will also need to be able to demonstrate from their editing history that they have sufficient experience, and have the ability to communicate in an appropriate manner with new users." Everymorning (talk) 00:01, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * What type of experience are they looking for? What am I able to do, without the right, to demonstrate/gain experience? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:04, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

I would recommend making more mainspace edits, reverting vandalism, and other constructive contributions to demonstrate that you understand how WP processes and systems work. Everymorning (talk) 00:08, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm at about 24K (14K mainspace) edits right now. Should I wait until ~20K mainspace? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:24, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * You've been an editor here for about a year, and you've made way more than the required edits to mainspace. If you think you have enough experience and skill in dealing with new editors, then I would say you should be fine to apply for the userright at WP:PERM. Everymorning (talk) 00:42, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * "Way more than the required edits" but still getting rejected. Really??? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Just because I hadn't read ONE POLICY, I now have to wait another 1-3 MONTHS?
 * VERY UNFAIR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 * Quinton Feldberg (talk) 06:50, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Man, calm down. You overreacting to things like this is the reason your request was denied. Everymorning (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Still unfair!! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 02:48, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

How long do you think I should wait before re-requesting? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd say at least a few weeks, TBH, before it can become clear that temperament issues like those that derailed your last request have been resolved. Everymorning (talk) 12:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Sounds fair. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 17:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
 * The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: 
 * On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
 * Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

DYK nomination of Georgia House Bill 87
Hello! Your submission of Georgia House Bill 87 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Jaiden Animations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaiden Animations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jaiden Animations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 19:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Georgia House Bill 87
— Maile (talk) 13:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

User Stilltim-Tim Westbrook-deceased
Hi-One of our fellow Wikipedians User:Stilltim died if cancer in 2010: RIP Tim Westbrook His userpage abd the deceased wikipedians page needs to be updated. Thank you-RFD (talk) 16:03, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

RationalWiki-Bruce Bartlett
I'm not sure if you got my message on your RW page, so I'm reposting it here. The vote was leaning strongly towards deletion, so I moved it into my userspace until it's ready to reenter mainspace. If you want to pop around and edit it, you know where to find me. Hope all is going well, RoninMacbeth (talk) 20:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I got the RW message. Thanks. Everymorning (talk) 20:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Woodley for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Woodley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michael Woodley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S Philbrick (Talk)  16:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of James Heilman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Heilman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/James Heilman& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Nik ol ai Ho ☎️ 03:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Article about me
I'm flattered, to be sure. Not sure it will survive an AfD, but thanks all the same. :-) -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer
What do you think my chances are at this point? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:39, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * They seem to be better, but there are still a couple things on your talk page I'm a bit concerned about (e.g. the declined speedy of a user's talk page, though that's pretty minor; also the message about your apparently mistaken deletion of content from The Christian O’Connell Breakfast Show, which you subsequently restored). I think you'd probably still get the right if you asked for it now and are more mature than last time, though. Everymorning (talk) 01:34, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Transparent Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transparent Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Transparent Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 01:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
 * Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
 * The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Proposed deletion of Christopher Shaw (neuroscientist)


The article Christopher Shaw (neuroscientist) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Seems to only be known for some vaccine studies that are in the news now, but most of his research isn't discussed by RSs. I suspect he will be non notable once the news coverage fades."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tornado chaser (talk) 18:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Category:Primary care physicians has been nominated for discussion
Category:Primary care physicians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 21:35, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!


Happy Halloween!

Hello Everymorning: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!   –  North America1000 14:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC) Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Draft:Brian Boxer Wachler concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Brian Boxer Wachler, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Category:American primary care physicians has been nominated for discussion
Category:American primary care physicians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: AirSage has been accepted
 AirSage, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:41, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=AirSage help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.