User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive 29

Rap music listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rap music. Since you had some involvement with the Rap music redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Dom from Paris (talk) 05:14, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:
 * WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags
 * Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:
 * A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons
 * There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy
 * Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English News Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.
 * Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
 * The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

Your draft article, Draft:Brian Boxer Wachler


Hello, Everymorning. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brian Boxer Wachler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  11:58, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ira Brad Matetsky for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ira Brad Matetsky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ira Brad Matetsky until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 21:42, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * When I addressed a message to you at Talk:Ira Brad Matetsky questioning the subject's notability, I expected you to explain your thinking. Instead, you chose to continue editing the article instead. For this reason, I have moved forward with getting that article deleted. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:46, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I did see that message but I thought it was implied that I believed Matetsky to be notable, as otherwise I wouldn't have created the article about him. Now that you've AFDed it (as I expected someone would soon based on the talk page comments), we will see what the community thinks. I apologize for not explicitly responding to you. It does seem weird, however, to imply that Matetsky would be, or at least might be, notable only if he were dead. Every morning   (there's a halo...)  21:49, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Apology accepted. I try extra hard to AGF with established editors, in case you had a logic I wasn't seeing. "...notable only if he were dead." Perhaps you hadn't seen Chris Sherwin, Lucy Ozarin, Piotr Domaradzki, and Adrianne Wadewitz? Wikipedians love commemorating their dead editors and obituaries make for good source material. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:28, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I am familiar with the Sherwin and Wadewitz articles (though not the other two). I know this does happen a lot, though it also happens with other people about whom no one created an article until a bunch of obituaries about them pop up. It makes creating articles and establishing notability a lot easier, certainly, when someone dies, but that's not to say that there can't be sufficient reliable sourcing even with living Wikipedians (e.g. Justin Knapp, James Heilman, etc.) for notability guidelines to be met. Every morning   (there's a halo...)  22:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

DOB
WP:DOB says Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object. Martindale-Hubbell is reliable, but it is not widely available in the same way that we normally expect for BLPs. It is likely provided by the subject,, but publication in a law directory is somewhat different than an interview with 60 Minutes in which it is self-disclosed, and providing it there is not the same as it being in an infobox that will feed to Google. I'm pinging him in case he wants to comment as to whether or not he is fine with the full DOB being published, but we don't throw our privacy protections out the window simply because the subject is a high profile editor. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:38, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I saw you removed the DOB (and then removed it again after I readded it w/Martindale source), and I don't want to violate BLP either. I suppose the key question is, how widely does a DOB have to be published in RSs (including Martindale) to qualify to meet the standard in WP:DOB? I can't find it in many other places (other than a page on Mylife.com and the Library of Congress, the latter of which just cites Martindale as a source ). Hopefully Newyorkbrad will weigh in himself and tweet out his DOB, as previous Wikipedians with articles like Emily Temple-Wood and Aaron Halfaker have done. Every morning   (there's a halo...)  21:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * That's the point: you were able to find only one source for it. That doesn't meet the BLP policy. We have the luxury of being able to ask the subject, but it is entirely reasonable to assume he wouldn't mind it published in Martindale but would mind it feeding straight into Google (I don't know.) The point I'm trying to make is that you should be very cautious with adding personal information about living persons. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:55, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Interestingly, there is another (potentially) reliable source in which the same DOB is included: this page for Matetsky on MyLife. I am unsure whether this website would be considered a reliable source or as linked to the subject to the extent required by WP:DOB, though. Every morning   (there's a halo...)  05:07, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * An online background check service would not be considered a reliable source. TonyBallioni (talk) 11:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive! Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
 * Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: NPPbarnstar SE.png. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: RR3217-0014 100 rubles USSR 1989 Gold avers.png, Swiss-Commemorative-Coin-1991-CHF-250-reverse.png, Coin of Kazakhstan 500Thinker averse.png, US-$1000-SC-1878-FR-346a-PROOF.jpg.
 * Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Minimum deaths
Hi Everymorning,

We finally have a definitive answer: The minimum deaths for posting an article is 9. Some stampede in Caracas was posted with 9 deaths, while many of it's supporters were opposed to the Miami bridge collapse which had only six deaths. Both items had reprints of wire stories in major global publications but failed to maintain global headlines. I think it's settled once and for all, 9 deaths is the minimum. Would you please update your essay?

Thanks --LaserLegs (talk) 00:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

WP:MINIMUMDEATHS listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MINIMUMDEATHS. Since you had some involvement with the WP:MINIMUMDEATHS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. LaserLegs (talk) 23:31, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:BODYCOUNT listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BODYCOUNT. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:BODYCOUNT redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --- Coffee and crumbs  23:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Question about updating a bio you created
Hi Everymorning! You created a bio for Dr. Josephine Briggs when she was Director of the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. She retired from NCCIH and is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of American Society of Nephrology as of Jan 1, 2018. Would you be able to update her bio?

Here's a reference: https://newswise.com/articles/josephine-p-briggs-md-to-lead-the-journal-of-american-society-of-nephrology-s-incoming-editorial-team. Here's another reference: https://www.kidneynews.org/kidneynews/9_8/16/16.pdf

Thanks for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.112.72.96 (talk) 21:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know about this. I have updated Briggs' article to reflect this change. Everymorning talk to me  00:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you! So kind of you. Dr. Briggs is actually going to be editor for a 6-year term (see the Newswise article), so it would be more accurate to delete this: "a position she will hold for all of 2018." I see how the NCCIH page was ambiguous saying "In 2018, she will be...." Her appointment began in January 2018. Have a great weekend! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.231.234.33 (talk) 22:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Project Med Foundation listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wiki Project Med Foundation. Since you had some involvement with the Wiki Project Med Foundation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:47, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants  Tell me all about it.  12:53, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Behrooz Astaneh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Behrooz Astaneh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Behrooz Astaneh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:51, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

International Public Conference on Vaccination listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect International Public Conference on Vaccination. Since you had some involvement with the International Public Conference on Vaccination redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tornado chaser (talk) 20:44, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers. Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
 * June backlog drive


 * New technology, new rules
 * New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
 * Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
 * Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.


 * Editathons
 * Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The Signpost
 * The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

Adopt a user
Hi I am looking to be adopted by a user. I've run into some trouble on AN/I where i made a bad judgement call in regards to COI advice I gave out. Maybe you can adopt me as a user out so that I don't repeat similar mistakes. Thank you. JC7V -constructive zone  08:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll adopt you. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk  18:25, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Questions
Hi thanks for adopting me. Just some specific questions:

thank you JC7V -constructive zone  15:55, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) If an IP has been blocked in the past month and they vandalize again for the first time after the block is up, do I give them a Level 1 or Level 2 warning???
 * 2) If I see an account with a promotional username creating a draft about a company that matches their username (but have no non mainspace edits), do I leave a warning message?? or do I report them to UAA?? I've heard conflicting things about this. I even heard one admin tell a user to take it straight to COI. It seems to me that there is a very thin line between the 3 actions.
 * 3) When is the most ideal time to give a user a welcome-vandal message??
 * 4) What's the best way to decide between tagging an article as 'topic of article may not meet Wikipedia's Notability guidelines' and PRODing it?? It seems to me that in some situations it's a thin line.

Your revert of my edit/reply
You're absolutely correct! There was no reason for me to. Thanks for the heads up. Stalking issue. Extremely sorry for inconvenience. Changing password (yet again!). AnonNep (talk) 13:19, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * To add some detail, I've posted at Helpdesk for more based on an ongoing offline situation . As I said in the Helpdesk post this removing posts/comments wholesale doesn't reflect my (years long) edit history. Again, very sorry. Passwords changed & pursuing the issue. AnonNep (talk) 14:06, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Apology accepted. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk  15:18, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the Bugzy Malone edit would you help me to cite sources KING 81 (talk) 22:20, 4 August 2018 (UTC) KING 81

Nomination of Steven Goddard for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Goddard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Steven Goddard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 00:17, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Wiknic 2018
Please join us for a Wiknic at Tribble Mill Park in Lawrenceville, GA on Sunday, August 26, 2018 between 11:00 am - 2:00 pm. Sign up here. — Ganeshk ( talk ) 03:14, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

About Jaiden
Look, I don't know which is a reliable source, today. All I know is, it has the information about said person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.175.89.40 (talk) 22:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The fact is, though, you can't include content on any article, least of all a BLP, if it is not supported by a reliable source. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk  22:36, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Heritability
Actually, it would be undefined, because it would be a ratio of 0 divided by 0... (genetic variance=phenotypic variance=0) Of course you have to write what the source says :-) --Randykitty (talk) 07:33, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the "two eyes" example is in a couple other sources besides the Maccoby article (e.g. The Gene Illusion by Jay Joseph). Honestly I was largely thinking the Maccoby paper was a good source for critical perspectives and wanted to work it in the article somehow. The source does in fact say "A human characteristic such as being born with two eyes is entirely genetic, yet its heritability would be computed as zero in a twin or adoption study since it is a characteristic that does not vary within the population studied". IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk  14:06, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, if I would want to be completely pedantic, I would point out that the heritability of having two eyes actually is 1, because there is variation (albeit very little, see Cyclopia) and it is purely genetic... ;-) The way heritability is calculated in twin studies, heritability would indeed come out as zero because both the MZ and the DZ correlations would be 1, so the difference is 0. (Assuming that cyclopa doesn't occur in twins or only so rarely that you never would have it in any ordinary sample). I should look up that Maccoby paper when I have a moment. --Randykitty (talk) 14:30, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I just found it by searching Google Scholar for articles with "behavioral genetics" in the title. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk  22:37, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Phil Mason for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phil Mason is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Phil Mason& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. w umbolo  ^^^  07:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health
Ritchie333 00:01, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Removal of Feuerstein edits
So let me get this straight. Feuerstein actually doing the things on his page that were in my edits is not a viable source? It doesn't get more viable than that. The Justice Seeker (talk) 23:28, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Other editors have already explained the problems with your edits. I will add that you need to make sure that you do not word your edits in a way that departs significantly from what the original source says, as per WP:OR. Your edits to Feuerstein's page contained lots of accusations about him doing things that it could not be verified that he had done in the sources you provided. You need reliable and independent sources to back up claims about living people, and you can't just link to the original videos or whatever and present that as proof of malfeasance, which it is not. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk  03:51, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Conflicts of interest in academic publishing
Thanks for adding that section to Conflicts of interest in academic publishing. I should really have thought of discussing effects as well as causes! Funding bias has a name and an article, which I have now linked to. HLHJ (talk) 18:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of TheOdd1sOut for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TheOdd1sOut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/TheOdd1sOut until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:44, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Hello, IntoThinAir. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for signing my comment on Jimbo's talkpage (I guess I missed it 'cause I was in a rush), and for your concern about my paid edits. However, to my knowledge, I am not violating any COI policies because I have declared all pages I have edited for pay on my userpage. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk  17:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited London Conference on Intelligence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Dutton ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/London_Conference_on_Intelligence check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/London_Conference_on_Intelligence?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.


 * Project news
 * The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
 * As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.


 * There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See New pages patrol/Coordination for more info to see if you can help out.


 * Other
 * A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.


 * Moving to Draft and Page Mover
 * Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
 * If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
 * Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
 * The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
 * The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Category:HIV/AIDS denialists has been nominated for discussion
Category:HIV/AIDS denialists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tourism/Terrorism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EP ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tourism/Terrorism check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tourism/Terrorism?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Let you be right m listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Let you be right m. Since you had some involvement with the Let you be right m redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 18:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sapiosexual


Hello, IntoThinAir. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sapiosexual".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 19:56, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of YouScience for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YouScience is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/YouScience until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 22:37, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Journal of Ethics page
Hi there,

I work for the AMA, and we are interested in correcting a few factual inaccuracies in the AMA Journal of Ethics page. Since we're aware of the guidelines to not edit pages about yourself or your company, we were hoping that you could serve as an impartial intermediary to screen potential edits for neutralness and tone.

Please let me know if this is something we can pursue or if you know a better way to go about fixing these inaccuracies.

Best, AMA Journal of Ethics Journalofethics (talk) 21:12, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * As per WP:COIEDIT, you should either go to the article's talk page (Talk:AMA Journal of Ethics) or post a request for an edit to be made at WP:COIN. Best, IntoThinAir (talk) 21:25, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Review and problem-solving sought
Greetings Into Thin Air.

I have just completed my first article. I am hoping you can review it for potential publication and also help me figure out how to do a couple more things to get it in tip top shape! []

Thank you,

PaulThePony (talk) 22:06, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Paul
 * Well first of all, you should consider whether the subject meets WP:ARTIST, as well as remove in-text external links from the body of the article per WP:EL. IntoThinAir (talk) 22:42, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Wikimedian of the Year for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikimedian of the Year is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wikimedian of the Year until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. w umbolo  ^^^  14:12, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
 * Backlog


 * Community Wishlist Proposal
 * There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
 * Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!


 * Project updates
 * ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
 * There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.


 * New scripts
 * User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js(info) — A new script created for quickly placing copyvio-revdel on a page.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Tamara Ralph for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamara Ralph is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tamara Ralph until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 01:59, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

BTW...
You might find JAH usefull. It's designed to be used in preview mode mostly.

For instance, if you have, it produces

You can then click what type of link this is (e.g. R from former name that redirects to the current name of the journal, R with possibilities if it's a redirect to a publisher...) to pre-populate a redirect creation.

And if you search for the ISO 4 abbreviation (or some other abbreviation), you can put it back in the template (previewing again), to have

And then click on both ISO 4 / dotless to create it as a R from ISO 4 abbreviation, or similar. This is useful for old journal names and their redirects (e.g. Yakhteh Med. J.). Cheers. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Judy Wood


Hello, IntoThinAir. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Judy Wood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. funplussmart (talk) 02:33, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations
-- Dolotta (talk) 01:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018
Hello ,
 * Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
 * Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.


 * If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.


 * We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.


 * With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karima Moyer-Nocchi


A tag has been placed on Karima Moyer-Nocchi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:29, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Alphabetical order in categories
Hi--

You placed Rick Mehta in a couple categories. Thanks for that. But you put the article under 'R' instead of 'M'. Could you correct that? Or give me a hint of how to do it. Simply clicking the edit tab on the categorys' pages didn't seem to let me do it. Thanks.CountMacula (talk) 00:41, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

(cur | prev) 04:07, 24 October 2018‎ IntoThinAir (talk | contribs)‎. . (2,055 bytes) (+36)‎. . (added Category:Canadian psychologists using HotCat) (undo | thank)

(cur | prev) 04:07, 24 October 2018‎ IntoThinAir (talk | contribs)‎. . (2,019 bytes) (+40)‎. . (added Category:Acadia University faculty using HotCat) (undo | thank)

Invite to help edit
Hello, saw you editing Stop and frisk in New York City and wanted to invite you to help out with Terry stop. Also plan on working on the following: Consent search, Traffic stop, Terry v. Ohio and Whren v. United States. But, Terry stop is where most of the work has been so far. Thanks! Seahawk01 (talk) 08:16, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Jake Orlowitz listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jake Orlowitz. Since you had some involvement with the Jake Orlowitz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:14, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Logo.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 27 November 2018 (UTC)