User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive 4

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jason Box, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mother Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Medical Veritas


The article Medical Veritas has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Ephemeral journal. No independent sources apart from blogs (not reliable sources). Not indexed in any selective database. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 15:13, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Maureen Storey for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maureen Storey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Maureen Storey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Writing for Wikipedia
There is a significant gap between your contributions and what should be on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view using high-quality sources. The approach of creating articles, then heaping upon them any criticisms you can find is inappropriate. (One-sided praise is also inappropriate.) In the case of living persons, it is especially egregious. Sources should be from reputable publishers. Avoid position papers from advocacy groups and most blogs (few have editorial oversight and fact checking).Novangelis (talk) 13:39, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry. But I note that if you want to add praise or defense to the articles I have created so long as it is reliably sourced then I won't stop you. Jinkinson (talk) 13:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * You don't own the articles you create; anyone can edit them, and it is no one's job to add praise or defense to an article. The objective of Wikipedia is to create objective encyclopedia articles. While sound critiques (written by uninvolved parties and found in suitably high quality publications) are part of a good encyclopedic article, the indiscriminate listing of laudatory or castigating opinions is neither encyclopedic nor neutral.Novangelis (talk) 14:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Greater Good (movie)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that The Greater Good (movie), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kadzi (talk) 20:51, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Criticism of Coca-Cola, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ACCC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Gabriel Calzada Alvarez for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabriel Calzada Alvarez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gabriel Calzada Alvarez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Novangelis (talk) 16:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC)