User talk:Intuitive2000

Welcome
Hello, Intuitive2000, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  05:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

March 2014
Your recent editing history at Pattern Recognition in Physics ‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   12:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * you are now blatantly in violation of WP:3RR having been reverted by multiple editors, please revert yourself before you are blocked. There is a discussion page where you may make your case why we should ignore our policies about using a self published source to provide unduly self promotional claims into the article, but I doubt you will gain consensus. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  16:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * And I have been removing the content not on the basis of "I dont like it", I have been removing it on the basis that it does not meet our policy standards for content. You have included a lot of blogware of non suitable stature and you are using the journal to promote unduly self serving claims. see SPS. In addition the claims as you have entered them are entirely WP:UNDUE weight to the views expressed.
 * Wikipedia does not give "equal time" WP:VALID - it presents content based on what reliable third party sources have said. --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  16:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 17:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Jinkinson  talk to me  17:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello Intuitive2000. You seem to be edit warring to restore your preferred material at Pattern Recognition in Physics. There may still be time for you to respond at the noticeboard and agree to stop. If you don't it is likely you will be blocked from editing. Even if it turns out you are right that is no defence against sanctions under our policy. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

What is your relation?
What is your relation to the account User talk:Ouadfeul? And do you have a conflict of interest relating to the articles that you are editing? --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  18:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Edit war block
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Elockid  ( Talk ) 19:59, 24 March 2014 (UTC)