User talk:Intuitjeff

Welcome
Hello Intuitjeff and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to QuickBooks, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 17:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello Intuitjeff. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to QuickBooks, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Intuitjeff. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  17:46, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

If you can tell me what goes against the guidelines i'm happy to correct it. I updated the sentance to better reflect the broader nature of the QuickBooks business. Intuitjeff (talk) 17:52, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:V and WP:COI. Wikipedia is not going to parrot the language a company wants to use to describe itself; we require independent sources.  You must comply with the requirements of WP:COI and WP:PAID.  I don't have a wealth of time right now so I will direct you to WP:TEAHOUSE with further questions if you want an answer in any kind of timely fashion (please keep in mind that we are all volunteers here), but if you work for Intuit, you should be making no edits directly to the article.  Best regards -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  20:41, 12 October 2018 (UTC)