User talk:InvadingInvader/Archive 1

February 2020
Hello, and thank you for removing vandalism from Jupiter Community High School. We appreciate this, but unfortunately your edit was not successful in restoring the article to its pre-vandalised state. For future reference, it is better to deal with vandalism by checking the article's [ page history] to determine how it appeared before it was vandalised. You can then restore the whole article, or the relevant part of it, to an appropriate earlier version. If you simply delete the visible vandalism then any content removed or overwritten by the vandal is lost. See How to deal with vandalism for details. Thank you. Tdc42 (talk) 21:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Testicle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deez Nuts. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hi InvadingInvader! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Matt Gaetz that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information.   Curbon7 (talk) 03:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Adding sections to city articles
Please first check with WP:USCITIES before changing section names on city articles. For example, with this edit, information about a local airport should go in a new section called "infrastructure". Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The UPS Store, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mailbox and Shredding.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

messed-up edit for Credit score
It appears that some of the citations in the 24 May 2021 edit of Credit score were quite messed up. I will leave it to you to repair. Fabrickator (talk) 08:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Fabrickator Thanks for the critical analysis, but could you please be a little more specific on the citations you are concerned about? InvadingInvader (talk) 12:50, 26 May 2021 (UTC)


 * There's the citation about the creditworthiness of an individual:




 * And there's the second citation regarding "alternative data sources":




 * (I note that these are nearly identical.)


 * If you don't understand what's "bizarre" about the above citations, please get back to me.


 * This was not a huge edit (i.e. with a ton of citations to check). I am mystified how the problem is not exceedingly obvious once the issue is called out and you spend a minute or so looking at the diff.  Perhaps I have a "blind spot" because I am using the most primitive editing tools? Fabrickator (talk) 15:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Just noticed and fixed. I think there is a bug with autocitations and investopedia. Thanks for noticing, Fabrickator! InvadingInvader (talk) 03:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The greatest degree of "automation" I am using are the various templates and "RefToolBar", so I'm probably not as understanding as I should be when other editors get surprising results, since when I get bad output, it's almost surely because I provided bad input.  Anyway, thanks for the acknowledgement. Fabrickator (talk) 06:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Beigel Memorial Fund


A tag has been placed on Scott Beigel Memorial Fund requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Albany, Ohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democrat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wikipedia:2jimbos2vandals


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:2jimbos2vandals, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review GeneralNotability (talk) 20:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tati McQuay (July 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tati McQuay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tati McQuay, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Tati_McQuay Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deb&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Tati_McQuay reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 18:10, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:SalC1
Hello, InvadingInvader. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SalC1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tati McQuay (February 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Slywriter were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tati McQuay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tati McQuay, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Tati_McQuay Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Slywriter&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Tati_McQuay reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 15:12, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

"Assaded" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Assaded and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

"Your contract has expired" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Your contract has expired and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

 * This is a few months late (sorry), but thanks! You should list it! InvadingInvader (talk) 22:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Planned Parenthood v. Casey
The name of the case is actually in the footnote at the end of the sentence. I'll let you decide for yourself whether to revert your entry or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avica1998 (talk • contribs) 01:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Noted. I think there should be a way to fit in the name of the case that overturned Casey within the main lines of the article, though I can see where you're coming from. Thanks for letting me know, and I'll be sure to take a look at ways to implement both of our thoughts! InvadingInvader (talk) 01:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I didn't make the connection that you were creating a link to a Wikipedia entry till after I messaged. totally proper and someone ought to do the same with all the cases mentioned. Avica1998 (talk) 03:55, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, InvadingInvader

Thank you for creating Stone Creek Ranch.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, InvadingInvader

Thank you for creating I-470 Bridge.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   00:41, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Please read
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tsitsernavank_Monastery#Fake_terms 92.1.144.176 (talk) 02:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

LRDC teardown
I could not find a mention online, but maybe you can. 71.60.214.208 (talk) 04:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know...I recommend don't put anything on wikipedia at all unless you can find a reliable source. The only consistent type of exceptions to this are for movie plots (the movie itself is the source).InvadingInvader (talk) 04:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Nah, it didn't cost me anything to make the edit, and I'll be in the history with the first report. 71.60.214.208 (talk) 04:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Space Shuttle orbiter
Hello! Your submission of Space Shuttle orbiter at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Naruto love hinata 5 (talk · contributions) 03:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice
Re: persistent addition of sensitive WP:BLP content, sourced to Twitter:. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:F5BD (talk) 05:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Twitter is not a reliable source; see WP:Twitter InvadingInvader (talk) 05:04, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Yes, exactly, but that's what you and several other editors keep restoring. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:F5BD (talk) 05:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Bring this up on the Article Talk Page. InvadingInvader (talk) 05:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I did. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:F5BD (talk) 05:09, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

DS notice
-- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 21:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Don't worry
Don't worry InvadingInvader I'm only trying to sort science fiction film articles in the right way. RoycottOxe (talk) 15:11, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Got it. I see what you're doing; I was just worried it looked like a test edit. Thanks for reaching out! InvadingInvader (talk) 15:12, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

So what about the science fiction film article should I remove the decade contents from it I mean they already have the decade sections on the history of science fiction films article plus it would make much more room on it. RoycottOxe (talk) 15:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Checked again; it looks acceptable. It just looked like you removed a template which from first glance looked like an infobox or important template in the older edit. I think the image should stay, though, and decades subsections would be useful (though the multiple See Alsos could go). If you want me to add those back, sure. InvadingInvader (talk) 15:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

I case you want to help there's another article you could help fix. RoycottOxe (talk) 15:19, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Can you do something for the article horror film? RoycottOxe (talk) 15:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

For the article horror film do you want to remove the contents from its history section since they're already on the history of horror films article or do you want to split the 2010s to present content into two decade contents 2010s and 2020s just so they'll match with all the other decade contents. RoycottOxe (talk) 15:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Maybe later; I'd like to do a bit of rewording on the history section and add back that photo of the lady from Metropolis. InvadingInvader (talk) 15:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Ok what time shall we talk again? RoycottOxe (talk) 15:33, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

The lady photo you could add that back but the decades they're already on the History of science fiction films article. RoycottOxe (talk) 15:34, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


 * It seems harder to navigate the section; I don't think smaller placeholders would detract from the article. InvadingInvader (talk) 15:36, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

I've already added that photo and video back on there for you. RoycottOxe (talk) 15:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

What about the History of science fiction films article there's already decade sections on there. RoycottOxe (talk) 15:39, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The section is too long. It needs to be split up into subsections for readers to find what they're looking for. I'm working on a larger edit as well. InvadingInvader (talk) 15:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

FYI, RoycottOxe was blocked as a sockpuppet of banned user Jinnifer. If/when they contact you again from a future account, please do not engage or assist them by making proxy edits. Many of the articles on genre films and/or characters have been protected due to them. - 104.207.198.66 (talk) 16:04, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Holy shit, Thank you for letting me know! I'll revert all edits I see from them ongoing. InvadingInvader (talk) 16:09, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Vikrant Rona Article
Hey! I've noticed a lot of activity on the Vikrant Rona article, so I had to research what was going on. The plot written in the article is indeed not related to the movie. The movie was just released worldwide today, and the plot hasn't been expanded upon in any English source from what I've researched. I propose leaving the "plot" section of the article blank until there's a major expansion on the explanation of the plot. Thanks. zenzyyx_ (talk) 20:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Got it. I'll read more carefully. Thanks for letting me know! InvadingInvader (talk) 20:30, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

 * Hi InvadingInvader, the content I removed from the injuries section of kayfabe was admittedly on a whim (I'm at work, and clearly don't have a wikipedia account), but reading through the last sentence of the section was a run-on with simply too much unexplained details to be relevant to the article. I tried to shorten the final sentence to merely link to the event which featured the match described in the pre-edited sentence. Like I said, I'm not a frequent Wiki editor nor do I want to be and speak with authority over somebody, like yourself, who has dedicated a good amount of effort to maintaining the sanctity of the website. Feel free to disagree with me, leave the unedited version up, but maybe look through my changes and see if it doesn't benefit the article. Thanks!
 * --Nigel, who might make an account after this encounter 69.91.193.118 (talk) 00:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for responding and reaching out! Try to leave an Edit Summary next time so editors understand your intentions.
 * BTW, consider creating an account. It's free, and you'll get a lot of privileges. If you need help editing, don't hesitate to reach out again! InvadingInvader (talk) 00:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, I tried to leave an edit summary this time. Feel free to nix it if it's a bad edit KayfabeNigel (talk) 01:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * No need to revert; this is a good edit! Welcome to Wikipedia! InvadingInvader (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)