User talk:Investigator87

ANI topic
I opened a topic about you, Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Please respond there.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, if you have noticed that a lot of people are blocking and don't want me to declare the evidence, they don't want this issue raised. Another problem in the region of most of the Part of Asia including India, Nepal, China, some parts of the Europe, South America and Pakistan is that they use same IP addresses that fluctuates each time with a different user so they block accounts as per sockpuppet and only those where they don't get jobs on upwork, well that is not the issue. But it's 100% true and I have evidence, there is a whole mafia of admins who are involved in the paid edition and captured the whole market on upwork, they only hit articles that are not assigned to them or have an open description. I am after this issue for a long time and were talking to a lot of clients on Wikipedia and guided them to publish the articles as declared or do not publish yourself or hire anyone. I have now a clearer picture and I am able to say that users, Bri, Rentier, Bilby, SmartSE, Hexafluoride, Bearcat, Power~enwiki and almost all who are involved in blocking and investigating articles. They only want to earn all of the money to themselves and they are not more 2 to 3 people could be one running a whole crew, run a check user on them, please.. You can see this article Le Trio Joubran I have a clear evidence, I don't know how to email it to you, and you can see they removed my message from the talk page of the article and they have created a bot as well like Bri has created. I have all evidence to everything I have mentioned earlier and named those articles. They reacted so fast and closed the discussion so no one can investigate. This is a very serious issue and at least someone should look into it. You can see all the patterns of those users, they only tag specific articles with a close connection template without any statement that why they have placed that tag while Wikipedia clearly says that they should explain why they have placed that tag. I hope I explained clearly.

And there is a very serious issue that will give you a shock when a user publishes a new article some admins are sending emails to them to get the article reviewed and indexed in google saying they have special access. I have an evidence of that as well. I am extremely serious and you can check that they closed your discussion as well and closed mine as well, whereas, they don't close other discussions until they put that to an end. Please help me and Wikipedia and remove that mafia from Wikipedia. I would like Mr. DES to participate in it as well and he has countered such issues where Bilby and Rentier placed tagged and did anything to delete certain articles, I checked his profile as well. All these user place tags on maybe scenarios. Please help Investigator87 (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

SmartSE
these are not accusations, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Accusations_of_UPE_from_Investigator87 I have proof for that, you guys are blind or maybe you have certain benefits. Look at Bri he is only defending articles while placing tags and deleted good articles, why not deleted Oliver Isaacs? Because one of you admins created it, I can show you a whole chatting with a client where he wanted to get an article and when I refused he said he will hire someone else. And I have an evidence to all the stuff I mentioned. I have seen a lot of accounts are blocked without even mentioned in that discussion WHY? there is a group of editors/admins who are well known but hidden paid and page reviewers. I can email you all evidence if you want to do something and do not fear Investigator87 (talk) 18:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Ok please do: smartsewiki@undefinedgmail.com. SmartSE (talk) 18:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)