User talk:Investor123

Copyright problems with Chepakovich valuation model
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Chepakovich valuation model, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.istockresearch.com/valuation/. As a copyright violation, Chepakovich valuation model appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Chepakovich valuation model has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Chepakovich valuation model and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Chepakovich valuation model with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Chepakovich valuation model.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ronz (talk) 15:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 20:23, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: Chepakovich valuation model
The copyright issue is not the only problem. I can find no indication that this model meets WP:Notability requirements (very little mention of it on the web other than a few forum posts). See also WP:OR. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:33, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I have the same opinion. The two Dummies books make for questionable notability. --Ronz (talk) 15:57, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 15:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Chepakovich valuation model for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chepakovich valuation model is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chepakovich valuation model until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 16:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)