User talk:Io91/sandbox

if you have a moment I'm wondering if you could check out some of the citations in here and let us know if you think they'll stick. This content will go into https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrimination_against_people_with_HIV/AIDS I'm pinging you here because I saw you were assigned to some of my students pages... hope that's an appropriate ping/ask. I know Elysia has worked on some of my student contributions in the past so let me know if I should reach out to her instead! --Liliput000 (talk) 12:41, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Liliput000: The things that jump out to me as problems are the uses of the avert.org and medicalnewstoday.com sources, which are in the 'myth-busting' explainer/advice journalism genre, but don't actually do anything to establish the prevalence of those misconceptions. I think this is reflected in the content of the "Misconceptions" section as well, which is more about re-iterating the basic medical facts that are often misunderstood instead of documenting the existence and importance of those misconceptions. This is probably not the right article to be describing the ways HIV can and cannot be transmitted — that's best handled by linking to other articles that are focused on those medical aspects.--Sage (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:41, 2 July 2020 (UTC)