User talk:Iopenalsw

Speedy deletion nomination of ADANCO
Hello Iopenalsw,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ADANCO for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:ADANCO&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Rentier (talk) 19:26, 17 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Nb. I have declined the speedy deletion nomination. See the page's Revision history for more information. North America1000 20:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of ADANCO for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ADANCO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ADANCO until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rentier (talk) 21:10, 17 November 2017 (UTC)