User talk:Ipernar~enwiki

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Dijxtra 20:49, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Source/copyright
Can you provide source/copyright infor for Image:Mitrup.jpg? BD2412 T 19:59, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Regarding Mitchell Rupe, I removed the image because it has no copyright information - you can not use an image that is owned by someone else, because the copyright laws permit the image owner to sue you for infringement if you do that. I'm guessing that this image is owned by the Associated Press, since it appeared in an AP article on CNN. BD2412  T 21:22, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Image-davis353.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Image-davis353.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 13:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Davis111.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Davis111.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Image legality questions. 11:31, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Davis3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Davis3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:58, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Last warning on images
If you upload another image that is not legal for Wikipedia to use, because it lacks a source or license statement, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Just so you know. JesseW, the juggling janitor 00:04, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Ante11.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ante11.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:32, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Raulsendic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Raulsendic.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

copyright violation
Hi Ipernar, I have replaced articles that you have started with material copied from news article with stubs. The articles in question are Botan Ise Alin, Alliance for the Restoration of Peace and Counterterrorism and Second Battle of Mogadishu. Please see Copyrights for more. Basically, you should never use copyrighted text on Wikipedia, as it creates tremendous legal difficulties for the website. I appreciate that there are few users adding content about Somalia, but it is far better to write a very small article yourself and wait for other Wikipedians to add more. I didn't check your edit history; if you have started other articles using copyrighted materials, please go back and remove the bad material and restart with a couple sentences. You may also be interested in Africa-related regional notice board. Thanks, BT 23:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Hostage kim.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hostage kim.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 18:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Kevin White (murderer)
This article was a non-notable biography according to the criteria set out in WP:BIO. (aeropa gitica) 10:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Niv.jpg listed for deletion
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Niv.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission.  While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it, but use the license to license it under the GFDL, or  to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use  to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you.

Possibly unfree Image:Wassef.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wassef.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 16:49, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Old Testament article changes
I changed the reference to the Catholic Church changing the Sabbath and removing the 2nd commandment and replaced it with more accurate information, with relevant references to show that the Catholic Church does in fact believe the Apostles instituted Sunday observance and that no commandment has been deleted. KosherPork 22:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Demjanjuk12.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Demjanjuk12.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. `'Miikka 19:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Shosei_Koda.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Shosei_Koda.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Zarqawi1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Zarqawi1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  13:37, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Ivan Čuček requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TRIRASH 13:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Ivan Čuček
Hi Ipernar, I see you're wondering why the article was deleted. If I remember correctly, it was about a Catholic priest accused of abusing children. Please read Verifiability. You need to back up such claims with a reliable source. Also, Wikipedia has a biography of living persons policy. Negatively unsourced material may be removed at any time. So if you want to re-create the article, make sure you provide sources and that he meets the notability guidelines. If you have any questions, just leave a message. Thanks. Spellcast 13:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

List of Roman Catholic clergy charged with sex offenses edits
Please do not add unreferenced or controversial information about living persons to Wikipedia articles. -- SiobhanHansa 14:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * See my comments at Roman Catholic Church you are more likely to achieve consensus for your proposed additions by putting them forward on the talk page first, when you have found good sources and so on, rahter than inserting them in unfinished form into what is already a very long article.  You have been reverted twice (by different people) already, and note that we are both Anglicans, so have no particular vested interest in covering up the problems of the RCC.  David Underdown 15:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I've only reverted you once. David Underdown 15:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David Underdown is correct. A change of this magnitude really needs to be proposed on the talk page to gather consensus. I will continue to revert in the absence of consensus. -- SECisek 15:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --SECisek 15:46, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 15:32, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nuns142.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nuns142.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion
I have nominated your articles for deletion, and am letting you know as a courtesy. The articles Christian Sabbatarianism and Opposition to Christian Sabbatarianism are a POV-fork from Sabbath in Christianity. Also, please discuss proposed changes on the talk page before making massive changes like that, particularly as the article is moderately controversial and has been edited by a lot of people. If you wish to learn more about Wikipedia's policies, please comment on my talk page. Colin MacLaurin 11:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Rosario Francesco Esposito
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rosario Francesco Esposito, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Your userpage
Your userpage includes content which may be considered polemical; attacking anyone's faith or espousing your own beliefs is inappropriate - see WP:USER. Please remove your "open letter" section, as it violates WP policies. Otherwise your userpage may be sent to deletion discussion. MSJapan (talk) 04:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Broken Rites Australia
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Broken Rites Australia, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Altar boys sexual abuse
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Altar boys sexual abuse, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of Altar boys sexual abuse. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Ipernar
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 22:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Your post on my talk page
What exactly do you mean by this?--Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 19:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Harassment of users
Please stop harassing users. It could lead to blocking of your account. Thank you, Rjd0060 (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I second this request. We're here to work on the encyclopedia, comments like you left for User:Phoenix-wiki are completely unwelcome and continuing may lead to a block. Shell babelfish 16:07, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
Following your edits to Phoenix-wiki's talk page, I have reviewed a number of your contributions and believe you are not here to contribute material with a Neutral Point of View. You show signs of stalking users, you show signs of spamming external links, and you show a great tendency to edit with a particular view point. If you wish to be considered for unblocking, please use the unblock template and explain in detail why we should consider unblocking you and confirm that you will cease making edits which upset or annoy users, which consist solely of linkspam or which are unbalanced and have an inherent point of view. Nick (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Michael Edwin Wempe
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Michael Edwin Wempe, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Michael Edwin Wempe.  SilkTork  *YES! 10:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Abu_Musab_al-Zarqawi006.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Abu_Musab_al-Zarqawi006.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lord's Day Alliance of the United States
A tag has been placed on Lord's Day Alliance of the United States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Sceptre (talk) 16:50, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Tomfox111.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tomfox111.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Kristian Menchaca for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristian Menchaca is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kristian Menchaca until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. EricSerge (talk) 05:01, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Ipernar. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Ipernar~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 14:05, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:ThomasTucker.jpg


The file File:ThomasTucker.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)