User talk:Iperone1/sandbox

=Article Evaluation: The Wipers Times=

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? What else could be improved?

Everything in the article does seem to be relevant to the topic. The only section that is arguably unnecessary where they provide definitions for terms and abbreviations commonly used in the Wipers Times, however, I found this section to be useful and informative. Overall, it is a very informative article that gives good background on the Wipers Times and strong examples of its contents.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

Overall the article appears to be unbiased. The author describes the context in which these papers were written and the contents of the papers without any apparent bias.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

The links did work. Throughout the article the information included is appropriately sited and the sources of this information appears for the most part to be reliable and unbiased. There were links to reviews of a stage adaptation of The Wipers Times, which did contain a perspective on the performance. However they were using these references to cite specific dates and locations, and did not include the reviewers' perspectives in the article itself.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

It is related to the WikiProject military history rated start class, the WikiProject Belgium rated start class, and the WikiProject Journalism rated start class. There appears to be little activity on the Talk page for the Wipers Times itself, however the associated WikiProjects are more active. Wikipedia talked in more detail about this specific trench magazine, whereas in class we talked about trench magazines more generally and included this as one example. Wikipedia also included more on the future life of this magazine in television and on stage, which we did not discuss in class. Iperone1 (talk) 03:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC) I originally had this in my sandbox but when I exported my sandbox to my Wiki main space, it was published with it.