User talk:Iplogger

July 2023
Can you help me understand your changes to references like this? You seem to be replacing sources with generic links to google.com. Sam Kuru (talk) 13:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)


 * These links were not quality links, were not related to the article itself and they were there only seo indexing their site. I did not find a way to simply remove this element. Iplogger (talk) 20:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see what you're saying. Those appear to be content marketing blogs, in essence. In the future, you can just replace the cite with the text and it will mark the material as needing a source. It's also helpful to use edit summaries describing what you're doing so that other people can help you without having to puzzle out your intent.  I was going to nuke those refs, since you reverted one of them, are you reading this the same way I do and concur? Sam Kuru (talk) 21:18, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree, nuke 'em. MrOllie (talk) 21:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Done. All of them were added by different editors long ago, so nothing seemed nefarious at least. Sam Kuru (talk) 21:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)