User talk:Iqperson

Regarding your addition to July 6
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to add new content, but your recent additions do not assert the notability of their subjects and have been reverted or removed. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Heat capacity— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jus da  fax   09:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Kofa appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 11:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kudzai Kofa


A tag has been placed on Kudzai Kofa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 11:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Kudzai Kofa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kudzai Kofa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kudzai Kofa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DonFB (talk) 11:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your Recently Deleted Article
If you wish to contest the deletion of Kudzai Kofa the correct place is WP:DRV. Please do not harass other editors on their talk pages. If they are deleting your posts that can be interpreted as an an indication that your commenting on their talk page is unwelcome. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kudzai Kofa


A tag has been placed on Draft:Kudzai Kofa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 14:55, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

April 2022
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Mino Raiola, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Never pronounce someone dead without a reliable source! Favonian (talk) 14:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

His own twitter page pronounced him dead. His own family. You are basing on the past rumours. As of today he has passed. Did you even try and verify Iqperson (talk) 14:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)