User talk:Iran nuclear weapons 2

Uranium
The levels of permissible uranium enrichment and the locations of permissible uranium enrichment under the JCPOA are explained already in the article, in detail. We want to avoid redundancy, as I'm sure you'll agree. Neutralitytalk 19:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Sometime in the next day, I'm going to expand the historical section of the JCPOA article somewhat to add some more context. I do think we may actually be able to hash this out. Neutralitytalk 19:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The JCPOA does not confer a "right" to enrich uranium. The agreement acknowledges and permits certain levels of enrichment (although strictly constrained/monitored, and contingent on Iran meeting its obligations), but it is very important not to frame it as a "right" - because that is a very controversial legal and diplomatic position, involving international law (specifically, the interpretation of the NPT). This is a subtle point, but an important one. I've added a new, somewhat long note (footnote B) which explains this. Neutralitytalk 03:23, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Western acceptance of Iranian uranium enrichment


The article Western acceptance of Iranian uranium enrichment has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unjusifiable split

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 21:07, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Iran-IAEA side deals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Murphy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Drmies (talk) 23:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * This is clearly not a first account, and you acknowledge as much, but even if it's your third account (I just blocked User:Iran nuclear weapons) you still have to edit neutrally. Your article contributions, even your user name, are not neutral. Drmies (talk) 23:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * More than my block, my immediate first concern is my user page. Please restore it. I DO NOT want to be connected, that's much more important than any block or not, someone just edited it to remove that statement; that's just wrong. I'll take a look at the block later. And yes, I am Iran nuclear weapons; not trying to hide that.Iran nuclear weapons 2 (talk) 11:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

I just want to note for posterity that I have been quite clear from the get-go that this was an alternate account. (it would have been immediately obvious to anyone that this and iran nuclear weapons were the same person.) As one can see from the diff, Wikipedia admin was initially accepting of the alternate, but at the end obviously not. From the above discussion, it seems that the intent of this block is to disallow the alternate account, but that Wikipedia is fine with me continuing to edit. I will abide by that. In return, I request that Wikipedia abide by my request not to try to connect the accounts. Thanks. Iran nuclear weapons 2 (talk) 18:55, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Pick an alternate name that isn't so immediately disruptive and you may have a chance at not bothering people so much. Otherwise, there's over 1500 admins, you're going to get a variation on opinions. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)