User talk:IranicaEditor

Please never edit on behalf of editors who are blocked or blocked from a specific article
I've reverted your edits because of that. Note that The National Interest isn't a reliable source. Doug Weller talk 16:03, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

The point is not behalf of anyone or any user, there all twitter accounts of NRF’s officials including their leader and spokesperson shared that website address and official twitter account of NRF also remarks that website if you have any doubts about official twitter of NRF then you will see all sources like bbc referenced that twitter account as NRF official twitter IranicaEditor (talk) 18:22, 21 August 2022 (UTC)


 * You are denying that your edits were prompted by an editor blocked from editing that article? Doug Weller  talk 18:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Are you support that scammer website instead of official website? IranicaEditor (talk) 18:31, 21 August 2022 (UTC)


 * You’ve evaded my question. Of course I don’t support scammers. I’ve reverted you but kept your link. You’ve already managed to get that editor indefinitely blocked, Doug Weller  talk 17:52, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I hope you are well

I don’t have any business with that editor, my contribution purpose from then begin was clear to I contribute the real content for the article and avoiding disruptive edits IranicaEditor (talk) 03:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)


 * That editor emailed you asking you to edit on their behalf. You then edited presumably on their behalf. Doug Weller  talk 13:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for not being here to build an encyclopedia, a history of disruptive editing, meatpuppetry, possible IP socking, and NPOV issues after ANI evidence. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 14:25, 26 August 2022 (UTC)