User talk:Iraqidatepalm2006

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) '''The article needs to be rewritten from a neutral point of view to be considered an encyclopedic entry. As it is now it reads too much like a resume and an autobiography, posted to promote the artist rather than to supply unbiased information''' Kon-Tiki001 21:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issue with Maysaloun faraj}}}
Hello. Concerning your contribution, :, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, : appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. : has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk: and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk: with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Whpq 21:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked you indefinitely. Until you can learn how Wikipedia works, that is not going to change. Continuing to post a copyright violation on Wikipedia after it gets deleted is pure and intentional disruption on your part. Furthermore, showing an unwillingness to discuss it with me and instead going to tell me off to other people is also a personal attack, and until you apologize to me, you will not be getting out of hot water easily. Feel free to E-mail me if you are willing to be an adult about this. —Pilot guy (go around)  13:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)