User talk:IreneVictor

Speedy deletion nomination of The ICT University Foundation


A tag has been placed on The ICT University Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://ictuniversityfoundation.org/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JamesG5 (talk) 20:51, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, IreneVictor, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, IreneVictor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:39, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The ICT University


A tag has been placed on The ICT University, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:33, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of The ICT University Foundation for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The ICT University Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The ICT University Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The ICT University (March 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The ICT University and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The ICT University, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_ICT_University Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Heliosxeros&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_ICT_University reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS message 14:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Flesher Andrew for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flesher Andrew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Flesher Andrew until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Calton | Talk 20:18, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Flesher Andrew


A tag has been placed on Flesher Andrew, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kleuske (talk) 21:17, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Flesher Andrew


A tag has been placed on Flesher Andrew, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Calton | Talk 01:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, IreneVictor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Flesher Andrew, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. ''See also Andrew Flesher. '' Calton | Talk 07:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

IreneVictor (talk) 13:59, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Jimfbleak. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Calton | Talk 14:54, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Calton. I do not think i edited or deleted any legitimate talk at User talk:Jimfbleak. If i did, that was an error. Apologies.IreneVictor (talk) 16:25, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note that editors won't know about replies on your talk page unless you link to their user name, eg Calton and sign it with four tildes ~ in the same edit. That will send an alert Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:56, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Comment
With regard to the message above, it looks as if you did inadvertently remove some text, it's easily done, no big deal.

I'm actually here to advise you, since you appear to have tried to follow our guidelines and I accept that you aren't one of the sock puppets of Flesher. It seems highly likely that your article will be deleted at the AfD, and any future attempts can then be speedy deleted on that basis alone. Furthermore, because of bad faith editing by the socks, the article title and the draft title are now both protected, and any attempt to avoid the salting by Flesher Andrew type titles is likely to be treated less generously than it was this time. Basically, if you persist in trying to write about Flesher or his business, you are likely to find yourself indefinitely blocked as WP:Not here with no option to create a new account. I'm telling you this to give you the chance to walk away before that happens. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:51, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Comment
Hi Jimfbleak. Thank you for the advice, thank you for the discussion, i know it has really taken a while, appreciate it. What can i do to create a page Andrew Flesher, starting all over? What do you advise? Can i appeal?2600:8807:1180:8EE0:A904:CC8F:A865:9E5F (talk) 15:37, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The AfD seems likely to come down for deletion, and that means the subject of the article is by definition non-notable, and can be deleted on sight for that reason alone. There are appeal mechanisms if a single admin speedy deletes, but an AFD is a community decision and unless you can find some procedural error, it's pretty much final. It's always possible that someone may become notable and have high quality references to support that, but it seems unlikely in this case. Normally when a page is protected we suggest writing a draft and submitting that for approval, but the malign activities of Flesher's sock puppets mean that draft space is protected too. As well as the topic being liable for speedy deletion on sight, you have probably gathered by now that creating the article under another title will be seen as attempting to evade the various protection, and could get you blocked. You have at least been honest and attempted to follow our rules, which is why I have warned you above, but I can't see any way forward with this. Probably best to cut your losses and at least retain editing rights here for another day Jimfbleak - talk to me?  18:45, 16 May 2018 (UTC)