User talk:Irfaankhanabadosh

Welcome

 * }

Proposed deletion of Most Wanted (2011 film)


The article Most Wanted (2011 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Movie is yet to be confirmed officially, Not got any evidence about its production schedule, in any third party independent reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Abu Torsam   06:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Most Wanted (2011 film)
A tag has been placed on Most Wanted (2011 film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Abu Torsam   06:34, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Raghuvaran. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Mspraveen (talk) 05:43, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Puneet Vashist, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mspraveen (talk) 06:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you add an inappropriate image, as you did at Raghuvaran, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Mspraveen (talk) 15:57, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. This is with special reference to PokerFace: Dil Sachcha Chehra Jhootha and Cadbury Gems Presents: Magic Star that you recently created/added. Mspraveen (talk) 12:08, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User:Abutorsam007. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Mspraveen (talk) 12:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Melissa Photoshoot.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Melissa Photoshoot.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mspraveen (talk) 06:18, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sumeet as apoorva.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Sumeet as apoorva.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mspraveen (talk) 06:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:AS Rana.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:AS Rana.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mspraveen (talk) 06:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Jaan Dushman Dvd Photo.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jaan Dushman Dvd Photo.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Mspraveen (talk) 06:21, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mspraveen (talk) 06:35, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — ξ xplicit  07:33, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for You have continued to add images in violation of our copyright policy after several warnings and an ANI notice. I've only blocked you for 72 hours at the moment, but I expect you to respond and agree to stop this. If not, the block will be made indefinite.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 07:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Actually, this may shed some light on why the user wasn't responding: they started editing under a new account, . It's now been blocked as a sockpuppet. See the SPI case for more.
 * Irfaankhanabadosh, you are reminded that editors are generally restricted to one account. If you continue to create multiple accounts and edit under them, you will be blocked from editing. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:09, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Given that you have completely ignored the warnings and my 72 hour block and used your sock puppet to continue editing, I am now blocking you indefinitely.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 13:32, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Armaan Kohli


The article Armaan Kohli has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  17:31, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jaan Dushman Dvd Photo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Jaan Dushman Dvd Photo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Armaan Kohli


A tag has been placed on Armaan Kohli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Muhandes (talk) 15:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Armaan Kohli


The article Armaan Kohli has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NACTOR which requires "significant roles in multiple notable films". As far as I can see this actor had minor roles in minor films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Muhandes (talk) 19:18, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Armaan Kohli for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armaan Kohli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Armaan Kohli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Muhandes (talk) 16:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)