User talk:Iri2101

Personal attacks
Do not again claim that another editor is working for someone else. For your information, I am a lecturer of Business Studies in Yorkshire, England, so am hardly likely to be working for a dating agency!! If you do that again, you will be blocked. Meanwhile, I have removed your potentially libellous edit-summary from view. Black Kite (talk) 09:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * As a lecture, please read what you edit so the page make sense after your edits.
 * Sorry, but if you edit the article to whitewash it in favour of your company (leaving an edit summary of "put the site in order", for example), it's going to be reverted wholesale - editors haven't got time to comb your diff looking for bits that might actually be OK. Black Kite (talk) 12:50, 8 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm not working for AnastasiaDate nor AnastasiaInternational, alas. It surprising and also funny for me how much controversy this wiki page is causing and it still has not been removed completely.
 * It's not going to be removed, because it meets our notability criteria. the only question is making sure that (a) it's accurate, and (b) it's neutral (and thus reflects reliable third party media sources). Black Kite (talk) 14:39, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

WP:ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Black Kite (talk) 09:46, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Shii (tock) 11:30, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Two pages have been merged together - parent company Anastasia Internationa and its website AnastasiaDate. I understand the merge but somebody needs to edit it so the page actually makes sense now.

Speedy deletion nomination of Guyspy


A tag has been placed on Guyspy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TealHill (talk) 01:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of AmoLatina for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AmoLatina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AmoLatina until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)