User talk:Iriseyes

'''This is my (iriseyes's) talk page. Please be polite.'''

AfD nomination
Hey, I see you nominated Adam moshcatel for deletion, and I completely agree with you, but please read WP:CSD, which can help us remove pages such as this much faster. Thank you for helping to keep the wiki free of nonsense! Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 03:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Next time you can use db-attack for that sort of thing, thanks, Mak (talk)  03:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

San Jose problem corrected
Law and Gov section heading back where it should be--needed to close a prior footnote. Thanks for your diligence. --rinari

GWB Revert
Thanks for the heads up--I thought that might be what happened. I just put my edit back, but I'm not sure whether you noticed the 'thumping' reference down the bottom; I think I'm its fairly safe ground POV-wise (it's his words, after all) but feel free to edit or remove it if you disagree Cambridgegames 17:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism
Don't know, it looks ok to me. --Guinnog 18:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

totally agree with you on the trolls policy but if you check my edit you will notice that i did indeed removed the word suck. and so put that. I will try to stick the more mundane rv from now on in the case of the word suck Trey 20:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Maiko obi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Maiko obi.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 18:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Apostrophe
Thanks for dropping by my userpage, nice catch on the apostrophe!  •E l om i s•     00:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Broken Link
I went to the discussion on the board, because the amount of information in Economic Policy is pitiful compared to other information given in the article. On the discussion I was suggested to make a main article containing that information instead. I, myself, do not have the time to make such an article, but I would like to see more information on the topic, thus the link. 65.172.9.135 02:00, 16 November 2006 (UTC) Forgot to sign in Fephisto 02:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

What else would you suggest? Fephisto 01:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Talk:George W. Bush
My error. Sorry, I was in a anon-vandalism reverting buzz and mistook it for a test comment by an anon. Had I noticed it was a reliable user, I wouldn't have touched it. Gzuckier 14:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Naruto

 * "titular" really is a valid word, although it was used wrong in that context. :) Danny Lilithborne 01:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Sachi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sachi.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 05:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Red links
Hey, Iriseyes, I note you've been unlinking red links. There are definitely times where that's the correct thing to do, but in fact it is usually better to leave them there. Perhaps you have already read up on this question, but just in case I thought it might be helpful to point you to Red link. Hope it's helpful! --Iustinus 05:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know. --Iriseyes 17:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Featured Picture
Congratulations, and thanks for nominating it. Raven4x4x 06:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating my picture! Much appreciated! --DanyX 12:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Iriseyes,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Geisha-kyoto-2004-11-21.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-03-15.  howcheng  {chat} 17:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Naruto
I took afense to what you said on the Nauto main page we both read the same manga and most of us know this already the great kawa made a mistake when he posted. So don't go around calling people stupid and saying you know everything about NHC because you know just as much as us.Sam ov the blue sand 15:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Ah sorry I meant the Naruto Talk Page.Sam ov the blue sand 17:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry for what I said I am now a changed person I have changed for the better.Sam ov the blue sand 23:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

George W. Bush
Thanks for your kind words on my small contribution! I just want to make Wikipedia read like an encyclopedia, not today's newspaper. Best wishes, Pol098 21:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

"Thanks for fixing my talk page"
I think the message you put on my Talk page wasn't for me: "That guy was getting back at me for warning him about putting the same message on Moeron's user page. Thanks for reverting it so quickly! --Iriseyes 13:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)" Best wishes, Pol098 15:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

'''You're right, I realized that after I posted that message. --Iriseyes 22:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)'''

I did it for the lulz.
Actually I wasn't getting back at you for anything. I just did it because I found it to be humorous. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.98.28.204 (talk) 12:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC).

BRoy titles templates poll
Hi, ! I've just started a poll about Category:British royal titles templates, and would really value your input - please do have your say! Cheers, – DBD 13:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Zebra Botswana
You opposed this nomination partly because the photo was a jpeg. I'm just letting you know that photos are supposed to be in jpeg format. See Image_use_policy. Not that I want you to change your opinion or anything, I'm just clearing up what seems to be a misunderstanding. Raven4x4x 02:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bartender epsiode 1 Cap.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bartender epsiode 1 Cap.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 19:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

68.39.174.238 02:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
The film you were thinking of, or have remembered, or hadn't forgotten, was The Elegant Universe.

Toronto Goth Scene
Thank you for your support. The article is not yet done and another editor has helped with an overhaul. if you think the article should be kept now please consider changing your vote on the article for deletion debate. thanks. and of course please feel free to help with the article itself. have a nice day. If this is the wrong way to send you a message I apoligize. I am new to this. ciao.TheDarknessVisible moved my message.. I see they all go on the bottom.TheDarknessVisible 05:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bartender3 2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bartender3 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:59, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bartender2 1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bartender2 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

I have a question
This will sound weird since we don't know each other and just because how it sounds but I am getting somewhere with it, trust me. :)

Do you play RuneScape? &mdash;  04:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)' P Я I N G'' ε r α g ђ  04:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I was only wondering. Way back when I played, there was a girl there that I knew, with a username similar to yours, and I had wondered if you were her. &mdash; $PЯINGεrαgђ  19:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Fortunately none of the friends I had there (by the time I gradually left I had about 105 but only about 20 were on regularly) were any closer than a "Hi how are you" when we got on and a "bye have a good one when we got off. Here, though, I'm glad I have e-mail addresses, chat handles, &c. :) &mdash; $PЯINGεrαgђ  03:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)


 * It is, but it was getting too hard for me to keep up with all the updates which was probably the main reason I left. Apart from that it's probably my favourite game on the whole Internet. &mdash; $PЯINGεrαgђ  21:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Featured image nominated for delisting
Someone nominated the Translational motion.gif animation for delisting from Featured Pictures status. I note that you took an interest in this animation. If you would like to vote to keep it, please vote here: Featured_picture_candidates/delist/Translational_Motion. Greg L (my talk) 04:19, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

What???
What??? I don't understand your comment (??!!). The three-finger-salute is the salute used by Serbian nazis. I see you don't know anything about Serbia. If so, why do you change contributions about something you don't know anything? Inform yourself before you change things. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.179.62.12 (talk) 14:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:Etiquette. When I work to revert vandalism, I work quickly. When I see the word "nazi" and "ultranationalistic" replacing "some", I assume it to be vandalism. In addition, while quickly going over the article, there doesn't seem to be any nazi influence on the sign as it was popularized in 1991 and is usually used in sports matches by youth. Before you write inflammatory remarks on my user talk, please check your references and be polite. --Iriseyes 19:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Hi,

I succeeded at my RfA self-nomination.

Thanks for supporting me. My eyes will stay keen for vandals and my devotion to the 'pedia will only grow stronger. --Amir E. Aharoni 00:06, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Darker Than Black
The impersonal tone of the episode titles indicates that 'the' is better than 'my'. It's hard to explain, but it's like you'll know it when you hear it, or an experience type of thing with Japanese.

For the final episode's title, you lost the 'miru' and 'kurayami' at the very least in your translation. -Atashi 05:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Tite Kubo (resolved)
How much of the information was false? Zombie Powder was cancelled, and later Bleach rejected, was it not? And I think TV.com is an official website, not a rip off Wikipedia. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * If you're not gonna bother answering, I will revert your edits and mine to Tite Kubo by assuming TV.com is not a fansite. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 14:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You still didn't answer my initial questions. I read the comments on the talk page, but how much of it is true? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Then TV.com is a confirmed fansite? Which dates are you referring to? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * {sighs}, you still didn't answer my concern on whether TV.com is verifiable or not. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This is different from what you're telling me. It's quite possible you're misunderstanding the situation. I'd like for you to review the edits carefully. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * See my comments on your talk page. I'm going to sleep now, so this blizt can wait until tomorrow, ok? =) --iriseyestalk 06:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Here are several websites which support my belief:, , , , ,. There's probably more where that came from. Are all of these not verifiable to your eyes? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * As I told you...five exchanges ago, if you can find a reference to back those claims up, by all means put them in. If only you had collected these links beforehand... --iriseyestalk 17:00, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I gave you six different links, all supporting my claim, what are you currently asking of me? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:08, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Use your own judgement. It's quite simple. =) --iriseyestalk 16:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

The Wessex Children
Dear Sir, you are cordially invited to join a discussion on this matter at WikiProject British Royalty. Yours in anticipation, DBD 16:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Doonesbury-Bush.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Doonesbury-Bush.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Featured sounds
I noticed that you have participated in Featured sound candidates in the past. There are now two candidates and the project appears to be abandoned. If you could look at the candidates and vote it would be appreciated. Zginder(talk) (Contrib) 18:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Willferrellglobalwarming.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Willferrellglobalwarming.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Aiaw.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Aiaw.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Vivica Genaux Fair Use Rationale Question
I don't believe the use of the Vivica Genaux photo you've added satisfies that fair use rationale for such images, as it is not used "for identification and critical commentary on the film" as you have described.  Nick In BigD (Hey!) 21:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

No fair use rational on Image:Vivica-rosina.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Vivica-rosina.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Vivica-rosina.jpg is an unfree image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days (CSD I6). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Vivica-rosina.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vivica-rosina.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Vivica-rosina.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Carlosguitar (ready and willing) 11:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

The "Prince/ss X of Wales" Issue
Just thought I'd let you know that there's a discussion about the above at the WikiProject, and I'm inviting all of the members to join in DBD 13:37, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

BSS
Fansubbing is illegal and Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning the respect of copyrights, so no direct promotion of illegal activities here.Folken de Fanel (talk) 11:27, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Then why is there a fansubbing article? --iriseyestalk 21:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Because it doesn't promote teams releasing illegal stuff.Folken de Fanel (talk) 21:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Neither does a reference to it in the BSS disambiguation. I'm going to replace it now. --iriseyestalk 23:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't remember agreeing with you on this point, so don't revert the article again by invoking this talk. It's useless if you're the only one agreeing with your claims.
 * To be clear, once and for all: there is no valid justification whatsoever for the maintaining of the reference in what you wrote here.
 * Of course, the mentionning of the precise name of a fansub team without any justification is indisputably a gratuitious promotion, because it allows the reader to clearly identify the team and to find it quickly on the web even if there is no direct link. Making it easier for readers to download copyrighted materials is not the aim of Wikipedia. Besides, one has to wonder what "Bullet Speed Sub", something that barely has 50 hits on google -and mainly on torrents search engines or fansub forums- would do on WP anyway. This team has no notability whatsoever, and basically, no existence except for the confidential group of people downloading from this team. The mention itself doesn't even direct to an actual WP article, contrary to all the other entries in the BSS disambiguation page (remember, "Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed"). These are some of the reasons why this reference cannot remain here, and why your insistence on keeping this reference on the page appears as a non-neutral, personal agenda aiming at promoting fansubs, while WP is not a tool for gratuitous promotion, moreover when it involves copyright violations.Folken de Fanel (talk) 12:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * More than that, it seems like you have a personal agenda against fansubs. I can see from your talk page that you've been actively trying to remove references to fansubs in several articles, and stepping on some toes while doing so...In any case, BSS is indeed notable in the fansubbing community. Most fansub activity doesn't take place on websites, which is why you saw relatively few google results, but on IRC networks, usenet, etc. Aso, I don't get 50 hits, I get several thousand. Are you trying not to see something? --iriseyestalk 18:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Edit: BSS as a fansub group is the fourth result out of over eight million in a search for BSS. Hmmmmm??? --iriseyestalk 19:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Are you trying not to see this ? WP isn't a tool for gratuicious promotion, moreover when it concerns copyright violations. Making up false google results won't change this.Folken de Fanel (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * That policy is obviously in regards to articles using illegal material, such as copyrighted images, etc. There is no policy stating "articles about illegal things are prohibited." And it's not a made-up google result, dear. Do one yourself and get the same results. --iriseyestalk 14:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

What the heck, I'll throw in my two cents. Yes, we can talk about things like fansubs and things that may or may not be illegal, as long as the topic is notable. It's one thing to cover the topic and another to promote it. In any case, BSS might be notable, but noting about them is verifiable, thus we don't have an article for them. If we don't have an article for them then we don't add them to the disambig page per Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) and/or WP:DISAMBIG. I'm greatful to BSS for all the work they've done (just finished watching their subs of GL the other day), but there's not much we can say about them on Wikipedia until such groups are verifiable and pass some basic notability guidelines. -- Ned Scott 07:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Finally, a voice of reason! I agree with you on verifiability and notability. I'll look into it and see what can be done. And yes, TTGL was great. :) --iriseyestalk 22:39, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Paragraph replacement
I was thinking on the Lerner Publishing Group article that the section "The Sharon Lerner Scholarship" should be moved to after the eight imprints. I just thought I'd ask, seeing as your the one that fathers the article. DeluxNate (talk) 16:26, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Lernerlogo.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Lernerlogo.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Time for resolution
Hiya. For several months now, the article naming for 18th Century British royals has been ever-which-where — all over the shop. In an attempt to solve this, I have prepared a page for discussion: here. Please, please, please come and discuss, even contribute to the Poll. Cheers! DBD 15:31, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry...
..for that message from Twinkle then. Getting confused between my tabs... J Milburn (talk) 11:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Westover1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Westover1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:22, 16 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:22, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Maiko obi.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Maiko obi.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Graphic Universe (logo).JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Graphic Universe (logo).JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 12:10, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Hercules - the Twelve Labors (front cover) (Graphic Universe).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hercules - the Twelve Labors (front cover) (Graphic Universe).jpg, which you've sourced to graphic Universe. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 01:34, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Lerner Publishing Group building, Minneapolis, Minnesota (4-6-2007).jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Lerner Publishing Group building, Minneapolis, Minnesota (4-6-2007).jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:34, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Delisting of geisha picture
Hi, I've nominated a picture you nominated for FP for delisting (of FP status). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/Geisha-kyoto-2004-11-21.jpg JPNEX (talk) 06:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Lerner Publishing Group (logo).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lerner Publishing Group (logo).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 13:36, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Lerner Publishing Group building, Minneapolis, Minnesota (4-6-2007).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lerner Publishing Group building, Minneapolis, Minnesota (4-6-2007).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 13:37, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Captured by Pirates (front cover) (Graphic Universe).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Captured by Pirates (front cover) (Graphic Universe).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ain&#39;t I a Woman? (front cover).gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Ain&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Shikomi.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shikomi.JPG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:30, 19 March 2018 (UTC)