User talk:Irishkiwi007

Welcome!
Hi Irishkiwi007! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Signed,  IAm Chaos  09:06, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battleground Melbourne (January 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battleground Melbourne and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Battleground Melbourne, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Battleground_Melbourne Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Umakant_Bhalerao&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Battleground_Melbourne reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 11:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Battleground Melbourne has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Battleground Melbourne. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:42, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

So, are you telling me that Wikipedia is only once something has succeeded. The mere fact that the documentary (or a movie or a book) is published is not sufficient for Wikipedia to publish on the topic. Isnt this censorship. Medical literature requires publication of negative/unsuccessful experiments. The fact is, the documentary has been published into the lockdowns and government mandates into the state with the most amount of lockdowns/curfews in the world. Surely this is worth documenting!Irishkiwi007 (talk) 11:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)


 * No, it isn't censorship. See Free speech. Bishonen &#124; tålk 12:01, 22 January 2022 (UTC).

So we have a counter-culture documentary, detailing human rights abuses by an Australian government, but because the documentary hasn't been successful elsewhere, wikipedia doesnt think its notable.

What would make a documentary showing a 70yo lady being slammed into the ground, by police and pepper sprayed notable. What would make notable a documentary outlining police the tackling of a young person standing idly at a train station, with a trip to ICU due to landing head first and the police being charged with assault? Irishkiwi007 (talk) 12:11, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Reliable independent sources covering the film in significant detail. A Wikipedia article summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a topic. Theroadislong (talk) 12:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you just want to tell the world about what you say are abuses by the Australian government, Wikipedia is not the forum to do that. A documentary is a good forum to do that, and you can tell the world about it on social media or a website for the documentary.  Wikipedia is interested in what independent reliable sources say about a topic; they will need to write on their own about this film for it to merit inclusion in Wikipedia. Social media does not have such requirements. 331dot (talk) 12:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Battleground Melbourne has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Battleground Melbourne. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battleground Melbourne (August 6)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Battleground_Melbourne Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Alpha3031 were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: A rejection is a final decision. This draft will not and cannot be accepted, as it has been rejected in April. Further submissions may result in deletion or other actions to prevent disruption.

Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:13, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Battleground Melbourne


Hello, Irishkiwi007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battleground Melbourne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  12:59, 4 April 2023 (UTC)