User talk:Irishpunktom

Dispute on FGC
Hi. I am having a dispute with a user on FGC. I noticed your previous contribution and hoped you might provide some third-party commentary on a dispute at Blackworm’s objections. Your opinion would be greatly appreciated. Thank You. Phyesalis (talk) 01:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Coldastheclay.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Coldastheclay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Expressveil.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Expressveil.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PicofJlarkin.jpeg
Thank you for uploading Image:PicofJlarkin.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD
Hi. You commented on a previous AfD debate on the article Hattrick. There is a new AfD here. Regards, Bastun BaStun not BaTsun 05:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Atwar bahjat.jpg}
Thank you for uploading Image:Atwar bahjat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Miraj.jpg
Hi, would you please tell me the reference of this picture :, We in fa.wiki want to make an article and we need the complete information about this picture. thankx --Achaemenian (talk) 21:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zachariah Blanton
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Zachariah Blanton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Convicted murderer of no significant or lasting notability; now amounts to a BLP violation as references are all dead links.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jfire (talk) 19:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Image Muhammad_callig.gif
This is regarding your uploaded image. As per the Muslim viewpoint, the name of Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) must always include the honorifics 'Peace Be Upon Him' in English or 'sallAllahu `alayhi wa sallam' in Arabic. Your image has none. This image could be acceptable as an image depicting the word 'Muhammed' but certainly cannot refer to Prophet Muhammed (pbuh). The concern I have is that this image is used in template { {Muhammad} } everywhere on Wikipedia. Request you to please upload an image with the honorifics included. Thanks &#39;Abd el &#39;Azeez (talk) 13:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Irishpunktom! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Muhammad Shaykh Sarwar -
 * 2) Svat Soucek -

Proposed deletion of Muhammad Shaykh Sarwar


The article Muhammad Shaykh Sarwar has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable author. No evidence of notability given, and a Google search finds only directory listings, no significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robofish (talk) 02:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Pilgrimschaucer.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Pilgrimschaucer.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Kamrams coins.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kamrams coins.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Muslim history
Category:Muslim history, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Image deletion notification
FYI - I nominated an image you uploaded for deletion. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * assuming it was you commenting there as an IP, I asked a follow-up question. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I responded there, this time with a link to a page where the image was found four months before you uploaded it here.... Any explanation? Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Marblearch.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marblearch.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Charteris.jpeg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charteris.jpeg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Plagge.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Plagge.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Nominated for deletion (4th time)
I'm trying to get this article deleted, List of former atheists and agnostics, please consider entering the discussion! Ncboy2010 (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to Infobox film or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
 * This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Veil Case Teacher.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Veil Case Teacher.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

United NationsN listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect United NationsN. Since you had some involvement with the United NationsN redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Islamic holidays
Template:Islamic holidays has been nominated for merging with Template:Eid. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 09:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Muslimmonths
Template:Muslimmonths has been nominated for merging with Template:Religious year in Islam. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 10:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

"Heavy metal in Islamic countries" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_in_Islamic_countries&redirect=no Heavy metal in Islamic countries] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Shaykh Muhammad Sarwar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaykh Muhammad Sarwar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shaykh Muhammad Sarwar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Lolekek (talk) 23:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)