User talk:Iriszhao0619/sandbox

Peer Review for Iris
I looked at Iris’s contribution for Disability Studies. Iris’s contributions are backed up by direct sources. I thought the structure of Iris’s contribution made sense and that the content was summarized well from the sources. Iris’s summarization managed to avoid original research and plagiarism while doing a great job summarizing the topic and the scholar’s opinion on the topic. Iris’s sources are strictly from high-quality sources, specifically peer-reviewed journals. The only suggestion I have would be to include opposing viewpoints on the topic. Both theorists cited represent similar viewpoints and opposing viewpoints could provide a stronger balance and remain neutral on the topic. Rodkeys (talk) 19:36, 1 March 2018 (UTC)