User talk:Iron Chef Quezon

Welcome!
Hello, Iron Chef Quezon, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Amanda M. Salvi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:48, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Your contributed article, Amanda M. Salvi


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Amanda M. Salvi. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Amanda m. salvi. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Amanda m. salvi. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:48, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amanda M. Salvi


The article Amanda M. Salvi has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The subject is a PhD student with no publications, and no media or other coverage as far as I can see. The 'Young Botanist of the year' probably elevates this person above speedy deletion level, but I see no indication whatsoever the article meets WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BubbleEngineer (talk) 22:59, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Amanda M. Salvi— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk  23:23, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Amanda M. Salvi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk  23:27, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Amanda M. Salvi, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli Talk  23:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Amanda M. Salvi. Septrillion (talk) 00:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * user had a legitimate reason for speedy deletion. See WP:G7. Septrillion (talk) 00:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)


 * This is getting rather out of hand now... I don't think any of you edits have been made in bad faith. I proposed the article for deletion as I felt the subject didn't meet notability guidelines for Wikipedia inclusion, but it made some kind of claim of significance that meant it wasn't enough to warrant speedy deletion. If you'd like it to be deleted, I can nominate it for speedy deletion instead? BubbleEngineer (talk) 00:16, 17 April 2018 (UTC)