User talk:Ironholds/archive6

Eros Labs speedy
I removed your speedy request from Eros Labs, which I assume you got to via Eros International in NPP; I redirected the new to the old. See the G-news hits; I don't think there is any question whatsoever that it is notable, even if the entry doesn't assert. 9Nak (talk) 13:03, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

thankspam
Disrupting and creating DRAMAH wasn't my intention, but it looks like that's the overall verdict, so I'll just live with that. Anyway, maybe I just wasn't made to be an admin; we can't all be admins, after all. Hope to work w/ you in the future in my non-admin capacities. Cheers,  Mr. IP  《 Defender of Open Editing 》 14:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Robert Polhill Bevan
Thanks for yours. I am glad that someone else cares as much about his work. There is plenty more information, but probably too much for an encyclopedia article. Colourman (talk) 16:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Sock case
All I would have to say is: "you'll see..." Arbiteroftruth (talk) 19:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * How would it be ridiculous? That sock operator sticks to the book each time, and when you look at Plagues Of Truth's edits, most of them are related to Singaporean actors (in this case, Huang Wenyong) and Western Fantasy/Power Ranger edits. The only edits outside of these two edits are made in regards to Keith deligero, a page whose deletion I proposed. The sock operator also targets pages that I edit sometimes.I can read the guy like a book, Ironholds. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 19:10, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * He has stalked me before. His socks reverted a lot of my reverts of his edits as "revenge attacks" in the past. He also created two impostor accounts that sounds similar to my account's name. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 19:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I can't believe it. I just feel like we are sitting there while the Japanese carriers are steaming to Pearl Harbor. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 19:18, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, I get the point. Let's wait it out, then. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 20:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Help with userpage?
Hi there. I was wondering if you could help me spiff up my userpage? I am still quite new on Wiki, so I am just learning the ropes. Thank you for any assistance you can provide! Silverwolf85 (talk) 20:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, I don't remember exactly where I first saw your name. It kept coming up over the past couple of days, and I think the most recent was Mr. IP's RfA attempt.


 * As far as the spificatation... Let me think here. I did already take one idea from you (hope you don't mind) and added a personal Notes page. Also, I would like a way to organize user boxes as I add those. It's just that I see so many pages that are very cluttered with userboxes, and I don't want mine to end up that way. :) The main thing too, is I'd like to keep it simple, both so it isn't too hard to look at, and so I can easily edit/add/delete things in the future. One aspect of your own page that I liked about was the section up top with the different area links.


 * I hope this gives you some sort of idea. Please let me know what I can/need to do. That way I can learn a bit too. :) And if you're not too burned out by the end of it all, I'd like to improve my sig too...


 * Thank you so much for the help!!!


 * Silverwolf85 (talk) 02:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * 3:33 AM huh? You really don't have a life, do you? :) The columns I like, to put a few of the main userboxes on my front page (like CVU, LoE, and such). I'd say 6 max. Then the rest, as I collect them anyway, would be cool on a page of their own. Awards, I'm not so worried about. So for the links: Talk, Notes (already created that one), Userboxes, Sandbox. As far as the background is concerned, a blue color, in the lighter range would be nice. And I suppose an archiving system would be good, especially as time goes on.


 * As far as vandalism. Yeah, that one reared it's ugly head a few days ago. As you can see, the very kind administrator Gb had to put semi protection on both of my pages for a few days, which expires later today if I remember right. Let's just say I upset a would be vandal by going and reverting one of his beautiful revisions, and it just went down hill from there.


 * The signature. Hmmm.... Can we do just dark blue for my name and dark green for my talk link? Nice and simple I think...


 * And with the adoption issue... If you're willing to, that would be awesome! Just so you know that after Aug 11, I will be cut down to logging in every two days or so, except for the weekends, which will leave me more time. I am a teacher, and out school begins on the 11th, so I'll have less free time on my hands...

Silverwolf85 (talk) 02:58, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Batales
Well, if no one is commenting on the issue, then we can probably merge them in good faith, provided, I feel, that we make a clear note in the talk page of what we did and if we made sure that the original article was backed up. In fact, I would add that we might do well, as a community, to make it our policy on old orders and families of plants-that they be merged into the history of the current (APG II) system. Exceptions being made where there is an extraordinary cause, i.e. an old order with a particularly meaningful history to it where a merge would be...distasteful. Beat Buddha (talk) 02:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Teaching and signatures....
Lol! I love the quote. And there are days when it can be soooooo true. :)

As far as the sig, can I keep the Silverwolf85(Talk) format, but have the colors run together throughout? Silverwolf85 (talk) 06:51, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I mean can you split the colors like yours, but spread it across the entire sig, and not just the username....
 * Speaking of morning coffee, I need to get up in six hours, so I better call it a night I'm afraid. I wont be back on till afternoon California time, so I'll talk with you later. Thank you again! I hope I haven't been too much of a hassle. :)
 * Silverwolf85 (talk) 07:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, it is much appreciated! Silverwolf85 (talk) 02:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: WikiUpdate
It would be great. I would like t use Skype while recording, in the event of an interview or discussion. if possible. You could also just do a news story. Red Thunder  10:38, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I think 2010 is a very good idea. Record it and and I'll get it in the next show. As for the other show, this is just a new podcast. I kind of got fed up with the drama at RWP and decided to start my own while it is inactive (possible longer). Red  Thunder  10:47, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * (edit conflict) I'd like the segment recorded by 11:00 tomorrow (your time), because I record an hour later. I'm spreading the word by posting on the community portal, and adding a "subscription box" to it. Sykpe debate: great idea. I suggest we gather up users with a sizable age range and have discussion on age/admin. Others involved in the project: Mastrchf91, Shapiros10, Vhoschythe, Xenocidic (possible), and gears of War. Red  Thunder  11:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't have the equipment to record segments, but if you were up to it I could telephone in and we can do an actual conversation or interview (which often sounds more entertaining). Ecoleetage (talk) 16:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No, I currently live on the East Coast of the USA. It is a four hour time difference if I were to ring you.  Ecoleetage (talk) 16:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No, regular phone. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:17, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Article merger
Hi - I don't mind which way round the merger is - I've tagged both articles. If Unlearned Parliament is indeed the name used in scholarly works, I can't imagine there would be an objections to merging into your new article. Warofdreams talk 10:56, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Wang Lao Ji
I have added some extra content to Wang Lao Ji. Please slow down and wait a bit before proposing deleting stuff. It takes time to write articles, and we don't get featured articles appearing from nothing in 4 seconds flat. I have removed the deletion stuff. m.e. (talk) 16:12, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Milagros D. Ibe
Dear Mr. Ironholds, Dr. Milagros Dimal Ibe is a very notable person. Try to google her name and see how notable she is, not only in the Philippines but even in Southeast Asian countries, because of her contributions to mathematics education.Fadulj (talk) 07:16, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Supreme Soul article
Supreme Soul has already been recognized much more than status quo, the runner up in season one of ABDC ... is there something i can do to make this page better or more meaningful... its the first page ive ever made on wikipedia... so i honestly just want some help... and you seem willing to help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tntom1235 (talk • contribs) 08:08, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Keeping in touch...
Hi Ironholds! Just wanted to let you know what has been going on with me. I have been busy working on projects of my own for quite awhile. I just wanted to let you know what happened to me. I have been gone for so long I hope I haven't forgotten how to edit pages! I already have a page I may need help with, but I am going to try working on it on my own first. Keep in mind I am a beginner, so if I come to you with something small and silly be patient with me! Thank you again for introducing me to wikipedia and taking the small steps along with me! coldgarden (talk) 17:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiUpdate
Very nice job today, enjoyed your episode. Mastrchf (t/c) 21:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry about vanishing, I was on an overnight trip. I have downloaded skype, and am on as Redthunder42. Want to do a joint show today? Red  Thunder  21:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Sure, but we need a topic. I'll record. Red  Thunder  21:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Sounds good. I'm ready when you are. Red  Thunder  21:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Redthunder42. Red  Thunder  21:49, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I've actually been chatting with RedThunder for a while about a collaborative interview, and we spoke about it on Skype today. So, I should be a contributor for at least a few episodes. Mastrchf (t/c) 22:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I believe interviewing WikiProject coordinators, especially some of the larger ones like MILHIST, would be a great idea. Perhaps an interview with a regular RfA voter on what they look for in an RfA.  And my personal favorite, a deletionist v. inclusionist debate. Mastrchf (t/c) 22:37, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I'd truly be interested in each. I have some experience in interviewing along with other audio work, and in my experience, it's usually best for two people to conduct an interview, so I'd most likely be one of those.  I'd be interested in debating for the inclusionist side for the last idea, also. Mastrchf (t/c) 22:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

<-- Basically, two interviewers gives the ability to have an interview with different POVs being expressed through questions. Usually this helps to appeal to multiple types of viewers, as many hold different opinions. I've also found that personally it's a bit more aesthetically pleasing to the ears. The latter is more subjective, but I prefer 2 over one. Mastrchf (t/c) 22:50, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Definitely a debate. This is one which could turn into a large debate, possibly 5 people depending on the views.  2 Inclusionists, 2 deletionists, and a moderator.  Mastrchf (t/c) 23:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Basically, I imagine 3 types of programs- Interviews, debates, and broadcasts. Broadcasts will be the standard information interviews, enlightening the viewers on parts of Wikipedia.  These would consist of the standard 1 person announcement style.  Interviews could be either a part of a broadcast, or an episode in itself.  These would consist of 2 people interviewing 1 or 2 persons just about aspects of Wikipedia, but would only be an interview, no debate.  A debate would most likely be its own episode, with multiple people voicing their own views and opinions on a point.  Mastrchf (t/c) 23:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Exactly. Also, as I said, if we ever needed to, a debate could suffice for a single episode.  But you get my general idea.  And I believe the philosophy thing would be best as a debate if anything, with differing viewpoints.  Interviews are usually meant to have only one viewpoint, that being from the interviewee, and opposing viewpoints from the interviewers, in my opinion.  Mastrchf (t/c) 23:20, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Basically, with age and adminship, I believe that we'd have to have a pro-youth person, if they are relatively young, act mature, lest it appear that we used it to discourage young admins. I personally hold the opinion that you should look at each candidate as if he or she were the same age, and view one for their work and maturity.  If they're young and display immaturity, or if they're older and display immaturity, I'd be unlikely to vote for either.  I personally think that a debate would be best, but an interview might be the easiest.  We could simply ask them the same line of questions and play them back to back.


 * For the inclusionist/deletionist, definitely a debate.


 * WikiPhilosophy could be done either way. I'd say it should depend on the schedules of our participants.  Mastrchf (t/c) 23:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * All of that sounds good to me. Mastrchf (t/c) 00:19, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Let me see who I can scrounge up to participate, and I'll let that dictate what side I'm on. Mastrchf (t/c) 00:24, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Sure. I'm good on most evenings. Mastrchf (t/c) 00:44, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * United States, Central time. Usually, unless it's the morning here, I should be fine.  RedThunder and I are only an hour's difference. Mastrchf (t/c) 00:50, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

<-- The Saturday would be more preferable for my schedule. Mastrchf (t/c) 00:54, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Our schedules are quite similar actually. What a coincidence.  That morning should be fine for me.  We could always ask Ryan, and perhaps he might have a suggestion as to another party for the debate.  Well, I've got to go for the evening, so I'll talk to you more tomorrow. Mastrchf (t/c) 01:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, my email is mastrchf91@yahoo.com. My Skype is also mastrchf91.  Mastrchf (t/c) 15:14, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * That would work. <span style="font-family:Lucida Calligraphy, sans-serif; color:DarkBlue">Mastrchf (t/c) 01:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Come Together: A Night for John Lennon's Words and Music
the link above is categorized as uncategorized articles.could you please find a proper category for it.?Bbadree (talk) 22:21, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

New Username
I figured I would let you know that I had my username changed from Silverwolf85 to Pax85. I haven't used the other name anywhere except here for ages, and thought I would finally get around to changing it... Pax85 (talk) 06:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If I want to change a page, I can since I am an editor. <em style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:DarkBlue">StewieGriffin!  &bull; Talk Sign Listen 10:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * For the record, this warning appears to be inappropriate and driven by a dispute between members of WP:RADWP and WP:WIKIUPDATE Fritzpoll (talk) 10:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

ANI discussion
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding the WP:RADWP/WP:WPUP dispute. Thank you. Red Thunder  23:05, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Reminder
Hey there, just reminding you of our scheduled talk at #wikipedia-en in one minute. I don't see you there, so just thought I'd drop by. Hope I did my math right. ;) - Ryan (my desk) 12:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiUpdate
My Internet was down yesterday, so I couldn't record. Also, the sound file you sent to me did not work. Could you try another format? Red Thunder  12:41, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, it still isn't working. By the way, happy belated birthday! Red  Thunder  14:22, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Age/admin debate
Is Monday good for you? Red Thunder  21:26, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Are we debating today in case of an editing need? What users will be involved? Red  Thunder  12:30, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Tickhill Castle DYK

 * Could you check your sources and resolve a small nit? In the text you have
 * Between 1151 and 1151 the castle was held by Ranulph de Gernon, 2nd Earl of Chester before ...
 * I see elsewhere where dates "1151-3" are mentioned. Could that second 1151 be really 1153? Shenme (talk) 01:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Skypecast at 5:30 eastern
Me and Mastrchf91 have planned a skypecast for 5:30 eastern time. We do need a subject, though. This will be for Monday's show. Please go to our skype chat and discuss it with us. Red Thunder  19:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Hi. I'm honestly really sorry for my conduct (the edit to your userpage). I was in a little prankish mood earlier and created this account for such acts. But later I realised that it's pointless to behave like this. My amusing-to-some and less-than-deep username is an indication that I originally didn't create this account for any normal contributions to wikipedia. It was the block that made me realise that it's better to do some worthwile contribution rather than while away time like I was doing earlier. So I decided to use this very account for normal contributions. You can see that I've built a totally userboxed userpage, and from my contribs you can find out that I've started making serious edits. Once again, I'm sorry for my conduct, and I hope that I do get forgiveness for this act. Sincerely

Pleasantfartsa (talk) 23:15, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Here's one for you to consider...
...try this on one:. My take: marginal, but deserving of preservation rather than erasure. What do you think? Cheers! Ecoleetage (talk) 01:47, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Just a quickie heads-up: The Berkeley Planet is actually a respected alternative weekly. I don't know if you've ever been to Berkeley (a fun place), but if you were there you would see it everywhere.  Hope all is well. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Something for your input
Hey, guess what...I have an article up for AfD! Here it is:

What do you think? Ecoleetage (talk) 14:03, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Friday
I'll do some general Wiki news, I also think we should put a tribute in for User:Jeffpw (see here). You are doing the interview, right? Red Thunder  11:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I would like to do the tribute, unless you knew him of course. For the news, we have the 2.5 million articles, updating the Olympics and the proper way to do it. Red  Thunder  12:06, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * WP:OLY has a set of guidelines on how to update the Olumpics pages. Due to the fact that Beijing 2008 is going on, many users try to update the ages. This set of rules may be ignored, it would be good for users to hear. Red  Thunder  12:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

pwned you
lol. I pwned you on the last barnstar didn't I? just check it out once again and read the lines of your praise. Only read the first letter of each line top to bottom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irhjalonragnkbalehasntbedhkfksdenheld (talk • contribs) 14:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Foreshadowing...
This is General Q The Funky Grapefruit from the Ocean Of Zero. Remember us?

You deleted our page because "we're not a serious band." Well we took this to heart, and engaged in a series of vigorous training excersises to become "a serious band." We even drank raw eggs. We are like the musical Rocky, if Rocky were 3 bored high schoolers. It's a High School Musical, if you will. Will you?

Well, we have a forthcoming album called Songs In The Key Of English, and we would just like you to know that we've dedicated it to you.

We'll alert you when it comes out.

OOZForeshadowing (talk) 19:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

All joking aside though...
It's ok if we dedicate the album to you though, correct?

OOZForeshadowing (talk) 20:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

You win.
Ok, because we have selective maturity, we will leave you and wikipedia alone. And we'll leave your name off the album. Don't worry about us, this is the last you will ever hear of us on wikipedia, i promise.

P.S. - 15, not 12.

OOZForeshadowing (talk) 20:58, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

re: Wikipedia:WikiUpdate
Thanks for the invite, but I don't have the necessary technology. I'm sure that one of the other coordinators does if you'd like to approach them. Nick Dowling (talk) 08:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No worries. I've posted a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators asking if anyone else is interested. Nick Dowling (talk) 08:14, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced thyroid gland
Hey there -- I don't mean to be a "pain in the neck", but I'm wondering if you could enlighten me as to what you could possibly have been thinking when you added the article on Thyroidectomy to Category:Shoulder surgery. Granted, the shoulder isn't too far removed from the neck -- but still, I'm afraid this borders on malpractice. I do hope you didn't actually proceed with the operation! Cgingold (talk) 11:56, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

re: WikiUpdate
Thanks for your message. Almost anytime suits so I can probably fit in with your plans. When would work best for you? -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 13:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I've emailed you my Skype address etc. -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 18:39, 16 August 2008 (UTC)


 * No problems at all :) Thanks dfor the offer anyway and I do hope things sort themselves out for you soon. All the best, -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 04:31, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

thanks for my suspention
hi HERE to say THANKS for deleting my work and suspending me form wikipedia and the rude email "if u hate wikipedia so much.....LEAVE' well im still HERE! have a great day lot of love idoit —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iounothing (talk • contribs) 08:14, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

DOIT
COME ON DOIT FUCKHEAD —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iounothing (talk • contribs) 03:47, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

hei
the article is not too exact as you said.. i notice that this organisation is not here and i have just included it

(Judemary (talk) 15:15, 17 August 2008 (UTC))

Quertzoid
Sorry, bad automatic edit summary. Something funny happened when I reverted the author's deletion of the second added csd tag. No, author did not request deletion... --Blehfu (talk) 14:54, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Albert I of Anhalt-Zerbst

 * Hi and thanks to correct the article. I can't finished this because i had to work !!! :( and i had no time. I start to made articles to all the rulers of the Anhalt states and its the turn of Bernburg. All mi articles are extracted from: German wikipedia or webs about genealigy. Sorry my bad english!!!! Aldebaran69 (talk) 03:18, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Do not leave messages on my USER PAGE.
Also, don't you dare tell me Wikipedia is not pro-American and Bias. Send me a messege like that again and i will report you. (Butters x (talk) 14:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC))

G'day Wiki-Updater!
...and whilst we sort of all fit that general description, I'm (of course) referring to your work in recording the like-named audio project! I thought I'd swing by and say hello, because I've been involved in the 'Not The Wikipedia Weekly' project - so we've both done some work in getting people talking and listening!

I wondered if you might want to come along to a Skype based discussion at some point - both just to generally hang out (because it's quite cool to do so!) - but also maybe to talk about how we might work together, and how we might be able to support each others' efforts etc. - if you pop along to our 'homepage' you'll find a link to a public Skype chat which is pretty active most of the time - or you can just add me as a Skype contact (ID Privatemusings) and I could introduce you to whoever's around!

It'd be great to say Hi :-) best, Privatemusings (talk) 04:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

dyk

 * Hey, congrats on the DYK! Very nice!  Also, if you have time, feel free to weigh in on this musical AfD offering: . Hope all is well. Ecoleetage (talk) 14:40, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Kingman Research
Howdy--

Thanks for letting me know about the propose deletion. As of today, I am learning more what I can do in researching to increase the information on each site that I am working on. I just started, I like doing than trying to read everything, I am more hands on. I have been working on setting up a guided walking tour of Historic Downtown Kingman. I have also done a small newspaper to be give to each person on the tour and this is just a small amount of information so far. I will be giving out the paper to the owner of the properties listed on the registery and hopefully I will get more information on the houses and buildings. So please bear with me. It you see something I need to know, let me know. Thanks, RobChilcoatr (talk) 00:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Baronets
Hello. Please note that for disambugation purposes, Sir is included in the article names of some baronets, to distinguish them from their predecessors and/or successors. I have reverted your edits here and here. Craigy (talk) 02:24, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Okey doke :-) Craigy (talk) 03:07, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: A question
Yes, sometimes. Mostly on politicians and political areas of County Durham, but even more so on peers and baronets. Why d'you ask? Craigy (talk) 03:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, that I can't really help with, I'm afraid. I'm rubbish at prose and usually ask others to do it as well. I'll do my best in creating articles on Stewards that were younger sons of dukes or marquesses (those with the prefix Lord), though, if it helps(?) Craigy (talk) 03:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You could try User:Malleus Fatuorum or User:Epicadam. Craigy (talk) 03:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Lots = 2? :-) Craigy (talk) 03:48, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah right. Originally, all peers had links, but a lot really aren't that notable (i.e. they were rich enough to sit on their arses all day or didn't have a political career), so it was decided to de-link them. Craigy (talk) 03:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I forgot to pass on this link - not so handy for list content, but definately worth a read, if you haven't done so already. Craigy (talk) 08:08, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm back
Hey I just wanted to let you know I am back. I do hope you will help me re-do my userpage. My e-mail is mccainworker@aim.com if you need to e-mail me. Thanks, America69 (talk) 23:48, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Fun with MPs
I noticed your edit summary and decided to poke around Google Books a bit. Searched for "'william michell' bodmin" to narrow things down, and came up with "Modern English Biography", volume II, linked in the References section. Says it covers people who died between 1850 and 1897 or so. I don't know if Google has other volumes (this is I–Q), but it looks like an excellent mine for stubs.

It's a pleasure to see someone grinding away at our collection of MP redlinks, and I thoroughly approve of your quixotic ambition with regards to the Stewards of the Manor of Northstead. I've been thinking of knocking together a little "how-to" for writing articles on British officialdom: succession boxes, common categories, other offices to look for, and so on. Would you be interested? Choess (talk) 00:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * "Quixotic" was more or less in jest; I've created any number of MP stubs myself. They can be a bit painful to compile, but we do have nicely formatted tables for some of the constituencies, which should eventually become the norm. I'll see what I can do about a guide. I look forward to working with you. Choess (talk) 03:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I've started drafting the guide here, but I still have plenty of work to do on it. Feel free to revise/ask questions. Choess (talk) 14:39, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I'd say I'm a pretty dab hand at prose at this point. Anything you'd like to point me towards? Choess (talk) 02:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * An interesting challenge. I am tempted to suggest merging the list with Manor of Northstead itself. The latter article is unlikely to grow much longer, and suggests itself as the foundation for a lead section. The status of Chalmers presents something of a problem. The information now there is probably accurate (E 197/1 does indeed correspond to Seal Office records of the Exchequer, including warrants of appointment to Crown stewardships 1787–1846), but it begs for more context. As pointed out, the writ to replace Chalmers was written as if he took the Chiltern Hundreds (or so the Gazette reports). It would be interesting to know if there was any entry in the corresponding book of warrants for the Chiltern Hundreds (in the same collection) for that date. Unfortunately, I can't imagine that it's in fact very easy to peruse those records. It would also be interesting to know why MPs started using Poynings and then Northstead to resign (to replace East Hendred?) but I doubt any records exist that would clear this up. I'll look into the merger, though; that would probably be a good start. Choess (talk) 13:48, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Er, wait. Chalmers resigned in 1842, so he would predate the list. Choess (talk) 16:19, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

2nd Lancers
Good to see you checking the spelling Jim Sweeney (talk) 10:48, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

crop wild relatives - speedy deletion
hello, please bear with me as I create our Crop Wild Relatives page. The material I am including, is material that we have written -- and somehow it made its way to the web I will try to cite and re-write, but it may take an hour or so. Thanks a lot! Allison —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allison Poulos (talk • contribs) 10:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Samuel Thomas Rosbotham
You've very welcome Ironholds. Its about 18 months since I researched the info and I've been meaning to create the page ever since. :) Cheers - Gallo glass  12:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

sandbox
surprised no-one had picked up on it before, it's supposed to be expressly forbidden or something :p. good work btw! ninety:one 20:53, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Pardon
I can't edit within userspace please read the "David can't respond box". Please stop sending new messages. I'm not aloud to resond to it.--Angel David (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Patrick McDermott (MP)"
A page you created, Patrick McDermott (MP), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Becky Sayles (talk) 08:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Oliver Young (MP)"
A page you created, Oliver Young (MP), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Becky Sayles (talk) 08:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

POLITICIAN
Please see POLITICIAN. Meeting one section of this wp:guideline does not necessarily mean that the subject is notable. In these particular cases the only assertion of notability appears to be meeting that part of the guideline, but provides no other context. There's no apparent reason that they are notable. Is there sourced information on what they did, who they were associated with, something that they accomplished that makes them relevant? Becky Sayles (talk) 08:22, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Right, "This is a secondary criterion". And it appears to fail the primary criterion. Perhaps if you included something about these pages you mentioned it would make more sense. Becky Sayles (talk) 08:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Becky Sayles
Oh damn! Looks like I accidentally click rollback, first time that's happened. I really did not intend to remove anything. Thanks for telling me. —Borgardetalk 11:08, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Subpage blunder
Thanks for fixing my error - first time I've tried to create a subpage. That would explain why the edit counter wasn't working for a couple of tries...--Wtshymanski (talk) 16:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

RfA
Hey, I made an error when I was posting my RfA - it linked to my userspace so you posted on the incorrect page. Link is fixed now. --Smashville<sup style="color:#03F">BONK! 18:30, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Your recent vote on Smashville's RfA
Hi, there appears to be a little confusion as to your oppose vote on Smashville's RfA. I was wondering if you could perhaps clear it up? Thanks! —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs) 22:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Just wanted to stop in...

 * Well I noticed a couple of them last night also, but when I was viewing the new page list now I realized that it must take some real dedication to keep pumping those out :) Bvlax2005 (talk) 07:15, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Only 100 years... Haha, well good luck with it! Bvlax2005 (talk) 07:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Not more stubs ?!
Sheesh - you trying to up your 'articles created' count again with all those politicians ? I thought those moths/bats/insects (whatever they were) were enough :-) CultureDrone (talk) 07:35, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism etc.

 * Thanks for the vandalism reversal - though I suspect it was accidental, rather than deliberate :-) Btw - what are you up to these days ? Have you finished Uni for good, or are you back there this year ? CultureDrone (talk) 07:49, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ahh - so I expect the quantity of your edits will drop off as you devote time to your studies.....either that or an increase in the number of Psychology-related article edits ;-) Nice to see someone actually enjoys Uni ! Yeah things are fine with me - house prices dropping, taxes increasing, fuel costs rising - wait 'till it's your turn ;-) Btw - how was Amsterdam ? CultureDrone (talk) 08:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Neutrality my arse
I quote your subject line to my talk page. Please do not leave ambiguous or insulting comments as this contravenes Wiki policy, as well as being totally unfounded and meaningless. In other words, grow up and put your toys back in your pram.Spoilydoily (talk) 16:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

The Intention Craft(single)
Thank you for your comments. I should have requested a deletion review for this article so I have set this in motion. I'll never make Admin at this rate, will I?Spoilydoily (talk) 17:05, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Kuching Mayor's Article
Hi, thanks for supporting the articles of Kuching's Mayor. Cheers. Mike86 (talk) 09:41, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, this is understandable as I realised that disputes and arguments may be unavoidable in some certain cases during the edit. But still thanks anyway. Mike86 (talk) 10:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

George Hammond Whalley

 * Whalley was even weirder than the DYK reveals; he was also a zealous supporter of the Tichborne Claimant. I've fixed the links to his son (George) Hampden Whalley, the one who took the Manor of Northstead; he seems to have resigned due to financial distress, as he went bankrupt later in the year. Choess (talk) 18:35, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

df747jet
My friend IRL —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheFeedback (talk • contribs) 20:52, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Weird response
I know that this is going to sound strange, but would you mind if I could tell you privately? For reasons that I sadly can't even explain publicly, it's best if the wiki is only mentioned in private; I'd be more than happy to boast about my contribs if you'd like some examples :), just I'd prefer if it could be done in an IRC (nick=danielfolsom),AIM (nick=FolsomWholesome) or googletalk (email=danielfolsom at gmail.com) setting.-- daniel folsom  21:45, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK!
Thank you for your contributions, and Happy Editing! - Mailer Diablo 19:32, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Your RFA
Hi, Ironhold. I've reviewed your first RFA. I was surprised after reading some oppose !votes. I've watched your contributions and you are doing a fine job. I will support your next RFA. :) Regards, Masterpiece2000   ( talk ) 08:59, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your kind message. You were talking about "non-wiki way to talk". You can send me an email, if you want. :) Regards, Masterpiece2000   ( talk ) 05:08, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

My Userpage
Sorry I havent responded earlier, but I really have no clue with what I want done. Any suggestions? Thanks! America69 (talk) 14:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

My RfA
Thanks for the advice. —Borgardetalk 06:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Hadithes
Okay you have to understand something: the Qur'an is (the only) Islam book. The hadith could´ve been said 1400 years ago or someone could´ve just composed it himself. You cannot be sure. That is why we take hadithes as advices in life only but out book is only the Qur'an and the hadith does not have any authority to ad anything to Islam, it only cleares some stuff out. And due to the fact that a hadith could´ve been composed by anyone in the last 1400 years, it is not qualified to be a reference. Nice talking to you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Y2H (talk • contribs) 11:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh it needed to be changed! I live in an Islamic community okay? And I am telling you that Muslims do not believe in it. Maybe a very very small number of them do, like a small number of Christians don't believe in Transfiguration, for example. That doesn't mean I can write a section saying Christians don't believe in it. And the section said showed Islamic believe in the Antichrist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Y2H (talk • contribs) 12:01, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

You still don´t get it. The eschatology does not say that! In Islam there is only Qur'an and there are studies to explain the Qur'an. That´s it! A person who will read this section will understand that Islam announces the coming of the Antichrist, which isn´t true. You got me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Y2H (talk • contribs) 13:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Chris Hornbrook ‎
I suggest you have another look at the A7 criteria. To quote:


 * An article about a real person (...) that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. As there are indications of why the person is significant in the article (a member of the band Poison The Well), the article did not meet this criteria.
 * to avoid speedy deletion an article does not have to prove that its subject is notable, just give a reasonable indication of why it might be notable. The fact that the person might not have met WP:MUSIC or WP:BIO is not important, what's important is that notablility has been asserted.

In addition, I was able to find the following in about five minutes of searching:


 * Subject of the article is sponsored by/endorses a particular brand of drums
 * Dedicated coverage in "Modern Drummer" magazine
 * Interview with subject of the article
 * Article that describes his work as "one the defining features in early Poison the Well."

Given the above, not only do I believe it wasn't a valid A7, but I'm not entirely convinced that we would reach consensus to delete at AfD. That said, if you wish to the article to see if anyone else cares, I won't object or remove the tag. Lankiveil (speak to me) 14:08, 3 September 2008 (UTC).


 * No worries mate, A7 is sometimes trickier than it appears at first, and it continues to do my head in on occasion =). Lankiveil (speak to me) 14:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC).

You just don´t get it do ya? In Islam it only what God (ate least we believe so) told us not what humans do. We don´t go to priests for forgiving for example or to take permission to do something. So the eschatology doesn´t matter really if it wasn´t mentioned by God then it´s not in the religion. Anyway you know that a weak man never admits he´s wrong and I´m truly sorry to say that this is what you appear to me. It wasn´t mentioned by God...that´s it! Islam is a religion in which people don´t add to modify stuff. We don´t have Torah written by a rabbi and another versions by another Rabi because people are not allowed to add stuff to the religion...and as clear as that is you still seem to understand it. So just do what you want with the page. You think you understand the religion more than me it´s your thinking. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Y2H (talk • contribs) 23:53, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

And the idiot who wrote this nonsense without any reference? At least I say it wasn´t mentioned in a reference (the Qur'an) and that is as good as citing a reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Y2H (talk • contribs) 12:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm new on wikipedia
Hi there. I'm new on the wikipedia and I have just started to create the article about the matrix ordinary differential equations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vadimvadim (talk • contribs) 19:16, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

This argument is pointless because I don´t care about what´s in the damn page anymore! And because there isn´t a need to be an argument, the fact that it isn´t in the Qur'an should close the argument in the first place but you (at least in my point of view, not necessarily a fact) are just too weak to admit I´m right. It´s okay anyway.

And one last thing, yeah the state of Israel would solve a lot of problems, let´s take an army go attack the people in Jordan, Egypt, Iraq..etc. kick them out of their homes and name this place after ourselves because 10000000 years ago you ancestors lived there. It´s your right to do this and it would solve problems I´m sure.

Nice talking to ya. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Y2H (talk • contribs) 19:27, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I remember your words were "I don´t believe it should be there (although it would solve many problems)." If I miss-remembered it..well it´s not like I called you names because I thought you said so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Y2H (talk • contribs) 19:33, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

You know I gotta tell you something, you probably didn´t expect to hear this from me: most people just follow what their parents and grandparents thoughts and believes. A very very few people decide to use their heads and judge old believes and see if they like it or not. You seem to be one of those people. It was just easier to go saying: "well my ancestors believed that and so will I."

You know, one day I thought there are people from other religions who believe they´re right, so do I. But why am I surely right and they´re wrong? Because my parents think so? And I read in the bible and read a bit in the Torah and tried to learn some stuff about Christianity and Judaism to see if I should convert. I like to think there are other people (who don´t do the same thing exactly! but) who think in this way, too. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Y2H (talk • contribs) 19:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)