User talk:Irula

Repost of Interpersonal (Ali Lohan Album)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Interpersonal (Ali Lohan Album), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Interpersonal (Ali Lohan Album) was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD) To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Interpersonal (Ali Lohan Album), please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Erzsébet Báthory(talk 10:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Playground (ft.Pharrell) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.Abomasnow (talk) 12:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Erzsébet Báthory(talk 12:41, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Playground (ft.Pharrell)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Playground (ft.Pharrell), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Unsourced, original research, looks like a mess, spelling errors, violates WP:CRYSTAL, etc

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Erzsébet Báthory(talk 12:43, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Final Warning
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash;Kww(talk) 14:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

More final warnings
Apparently you don't believe us when we tell you that you will be blocked, so here's your last chance: This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball or a collection of unverifiable speculation. All information about anticipated events must be verifiable, such as your addition of a release date for a single on Lindsay Lohan's third album. Please do not add information about future events to infoboxes, succession boxes, discographies and filmographies. If you do so again, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 (talk) 18:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Alexandrababelove for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Erzsébet Báthory(talk 14:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)