User talk:Irvybabes

"Bums"

 * The game has been played regularly at University College, Durham for at least a decade, where the picturesque surroundings of Palace Green are temporarily converted into Bums Pitches during the spring and summer months.

I was in Durham studying in 2000-3, and was around for a good fraction of another subsequent year. I ate on Palace Green. I sat exams there. I ran errands around it. I walked across it twice a day for an entire year (living in the Viaduct does that for you), and most of the rest of the time went through it three or four times a week. Surprisingly enough, I never encountered this "traditional game" being played, nor did it ever at any time come to my attention. I don't claim to know everything that went on in those years, but I do find it somewhat hard to credit that Palace Green could have been "temporarily converted" without my noticing it in passing.

No-one has provided a cited, reliable source that this game exists, and at least two people I know personally to be reliable, with eighteen years experience of the University between them, say on the deletion debate they've never heard of it - and one of them a member of Castle SCR! This means that either:


 * a) someone made it up, or
 * b) it exists, but is sufficiently insignificant that nothing serious has ever been written about it, and that people with long experience of the places it's played have never encountered it

Neither of these fill me with great faith in the idea that the claims about this game have any grounding in the real world. Thanks for playing, but unless you can provide reliable evidence about the game both existing and having encylopedic significance, the article and the references to it are going; leaving snide remarks around on talk pages telling people they're "parading themselves as a fuck-up" or warning them about "humiliating themselves further" doesn't actually achieve anything, you know. Shimgray | talk | 18:05, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jcc re


A tag has been placed on Jcc re requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pauline Re


A tag has been placed on Pauline Re requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Electric Catfish 17:19, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve Pauline Re
Thanks for creating Pauline Re, Irvybabes!

Wikipedia editor MathewTownsend has tagged the page as having some issues to fix. In addition, they wrote this note for you:

"Please add references and citations for all quotes"

The tags on the page can be removed by you or another editor when the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on MathewTownsend's talk page, or talk to the volunteers at the teahouse, who are always happy to help.

Learn more about page curation.