User talk:Isa gajre

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. --Bonadea (talk) 11:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Yng varr  13:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Bonadea !!!!!!!
Ich bin Anfänger bei Wikipedia und deswegen habe ich die an mich gerichteten talks nicht gesehen.

Was mich aber die ganze Zeit stört, ist dass Sie ständig Saaspel löschen. Ich würde gerne den Grund dafür wissen, da Saaspel genau so untergeordnet war wie alle anderen >> Spelling reform external links << Bitte erklären Sie mir, warum Sie Saaspel als spam einstufen und alle anderen external links, mit gleichem Thema nicht?

Ich werde Saaspel noch einmal eintragen und bitte Sie es nicht mehr zu löschen. Ich bin nicht der Saaspel Autor aber ein Mitglied.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isa gajre (talk • contribs) March 8, 2008


 * Responding in English, because it is discouraged to communicate in other languages on English Wikipedia, unless either person doesn't understand English. The link to the Saaspel project is inserted without any explanatory text what it is about, only a slogan in that language. The link points to your own website which gives the appearance of self-promotion; even if you are not the site's author you previously signed your name Roy W. Blain - and as a contributor to the site it is still a conflict of interest for you to link to it. Please see the conflict of interest guidelines for information about why it is not a good idea to link to one's own projects. Please note that Wikipedia should never be used for promotional purposes, of ideas, web sites, people or services.


 * In the article English spelling reform there are no other external links to specific spelling reform projects, so it seems quite straightforward that you shouldn't include it there. In the article Spelling reform there are several such external links. I will look into which ones appear to be really relevant for the page, and which ones can probably be pruned. --Bonadea (talk) 08:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Sayspel. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gurt Posh (talk) 08:08, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sayspel, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Gurt Posh (talk) 08:19, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sayspel, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gurt Posh (talk) 10:10, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sayspel


The article Sayspel has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, non-notable proposal per WP:GNG, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gurt Posh (talk) 00:49, 17 July 2011 (UTC)