User talk:Isa trademark

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! - CobaltBlueTony 20:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Please review WP:NOT. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place to tout your viewpoint about your group or agency. If you are notable, you will see various viewpoints about you expressed insofar as they are equally as relevant and significant. Thanks. - CobaltBlueTony 20:52, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Removing messages
Do not remove editors' template messages until their topics have been resolved. Doing so is considered vandalism. Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony 20:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages unless the required changes have been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an page. Thank you. - CobaltBlueTony 20:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. Happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony 21:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. - CobaltBlueTony 21:03, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages-- it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. - CobaltBlueTony 21:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Uncivil editing
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to International Space Agency (ISA) and Talk:International Space Agency (ISA), are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. - CobaltBlueTony 21:08, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices and comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - CobaltBlueTony 21:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - CobaltBlueTony 21:12, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Stop_hand.png|30px|left]] You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy . If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to do so after the block expires.
 * Should have been a 10RR violation &mdash; but he wasn't warned about that. &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 23:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Spam
Sending "welcome" messages to editors who edit "your" articles (articles you created, about your organization &mdash; no one owns articles here on Wikipedia, as can be seen at WP:OWN) is considered SPAM, and is not likely to be helpful in keeping the articles intact. &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 23:46, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Article content ownership
Do you realise that by creating the article, and by adding the content, you effectively have copyrighted it under the GFDL. That licence state explicitly: The purpose of this License is to make a manual, textbook, or other functional and useful document "free" in the sense of freedom: to assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and redistribute it, with or without modifying it, either commercially or noncommercially. Therefore, you cannot claim ownership of the article, and everybody can change and modify the content. Stronger, the content is already part of the world, and anywhere were this content is showing up, in modified or not form, it is out of your hands and they can claim that based on the posting of that information here at Wikipedia. If you do not want that, the only way is to get the article deleted. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 02:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)