User talk:Isaaceldon76

Note regarding interactions with other accounts
Hi, my name's Tamzin. One of the things I do on Wikipedia is look into situations where accounts have interacted in unusual ways. Please see the note I've left for you at Sockpuppet investigations/Benjamin.Olivier. You're not in any trouble right now, but please keep what I said in mind for the future. Thanks. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 17:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I noticed that in this edit to RingID, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, Isaaceldon76. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page RingID, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Mojo Hand (talk) 16:37, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I noticed that you recently removed content from RingID without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 00:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Ingenuity,
 * Please note that this reports are complete act of defamation and unfortunately only exists in the diatribe of certain journalists carrying out public-reportage on behalf of third parties (competitors) . Please do let us know what can be done to remove this. Isaaceldon76 (talk) 00:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Are you saying that there are parts of the content in question that are factually incorrect? If so, what parts, and could you please present sources showing that they're incorrect? --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 03:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello Tamzin,
 * First and Foremost, ringID is a product of this Ring Inc which does not have any subsidiary in Bangladesh. Ring Bangladesh's entity has nothing to do with Ring Inc from legal ownership point of view.
 * Ring Bangladesh is independent entity registered in Bangladesh who a campaign on ringID platform called Brand Promoter program aka Community job taking a subscription fee.
 * Brand Promoter program allows to do Affiliate marketing  which they earn a commission for selling products given in ringID’s affiliate network or promotional  pool. The affiliate simply searches for products they enjoy and create a virtual store, then promote and sell through ringID Interactive Live Feature. They can also promote products via other social networking platforms or social channels to customers including their existing friends, family or fan base. When someone buys through the affiliate link, he/she gets a commission. FYI, Affiliate marketing  is very common business model if we look in Amazon Affiliate Marketing or even Meesho Business Model.
 * This simple subscription based affiliated marketing model was deliberately misrepresented and compared with Ponzi or MLM other inappropriate terms by the media, which is completely fictitious  and deliberately done  by certain journalists carrying out public-reportage on behalf of third parties.
 * As both are independent entity, it’s not wiser to link one- to -another and jeopardize company’s long earn reputation and business ethics, unless  you are also part of those journalist and assigned to do so! Isaaceldon76 (talk) 16:58, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If you wants to learn more details, someone from Bangladesh entity will contact you and explain you further in details. Isaaceldon76 (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Well I'm going to restore the part of the article about the Ponzi scheme allegations, since you don't seem to be disputing those. As to the Bangladesh angle, is or is not Saiful Islam affiliated with RingID? --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 20:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I have explained their business model  clearly which is similar as Meesho and Amazon affiliates. Wasn't that clear enough to disputing? If that's the case then all this affiliate model would be Ponzi? Please send us a reference  where  it is mention that Amazon is doing Ponzi.
 * I'm removing back  about the Ponzi scheme allegations. Taking a subscription fee out of a membership can never be Ponzi. Remember an honest journalist's report be always  consist of two side of the coin, not one sided fictitious report to make the news juicy . Isaaceldon76 (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Isaaceldon76, are you employed by RingID or anyone affiliated with them? --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 01:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not but I have the same question. Are you anyone affiliated with those  to defame the company seems like you have a deeper interest. Isaaceldon76 (talk) 19:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * No. I have no involvement in any aspect of South Asian tech companies or tech journalism. Now, I'm going to be very clear, under the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use, you are required to disclose if you are being paid to edit Wikipedia. This includes editing because a boss asked you to. You stated above, Please note that this reports are complete act of defamation and unfortunately only exists in the diatribe of certain journalists carrying out public-reportage on behalf of third parties (competitors) . Please do let us know what can be done to remove this. That is, obviously, you speaking on behalf of RingID. So I'm giving you one chance to be honest: Are you being paid by RingID or any affiliate of it? If you aren't, please explain why you are speaking on behalf of the company. In the meantime, please do not edit the article again until this is resolved. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 03:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not but I have the same question. Are you anyone affiliated with those  to defame the company seems like you have a deeper interest. Isaaceldon76 (talk) 19:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * No. I have no involvement in any aspect of South Asian tech companies or tech journalism. Now, I'm going to be very clear, under the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use, you are required to disclose if you are being paid to edit Wikipedia. This includes editing because a boss asked you to. You stated above, Please note that this reports are complete act of defamation and unfortunately only exists in the diatribe of certain journalists carrying out public-reportage on behalf of third parties (competitors) . Please do let us know what can be done to remove this. That is, obviously, you speaking on behalf of RingID. So I'm giving you one chance to be honest: Are you being paid by RingID or any affiliate of it? If you aren't, please explain why you are speaking on behalf of the company. In the meantime, please do not edit the article again until this is resolved. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 03:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at RingID, you may be blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 03:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Please stop your vandalism against ringID. Its clear that you are paid by someone and on the mission to write against ringID. If you don't stop, we will be bound to take legal action and  write to the authority of wikipedia. Isaaceldon76 (talk) 14:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 14:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

This block is also due to your failure to clarify whether you are receiving compensation for your edits; judging from your edit summaries, it seems that you are. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 14:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Im not getting compensate but seems you are. None of you wrote a single line about ringID. but rather you have been purely interested to write about its criticism and now drag  its owners. Isn't that a  pure vandalism. If you don't stop, we will be bound to take legal action and write to the authority of wikipedia Isaaceldon76 (talk) 15:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)