User talk:Isabel Bono Morell

March 2019
Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of an article. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  21:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Caxton College have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  16:29, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello Isabel Bono Morell. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Caxton College, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Isabel Bono Morell. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ''This is an encyclopedia, not a social media platform or a vehicle for the school to promote itself. Please read Wikipedia's neutral point-of-view requirements, a discussion of what Wikipedia is not to be used for, and guidelines regarding unacceptable language that breaches the neutral-point-of-view policy; "friendly," for example, is a word that should never be used in an encyclopedia to describe a building. You must also read the conflict-of-interest guidelines. I am afraid you have a complete misunderstanding of the nature and purpose of this website. My time today is limited (I am a volunteer, like almost everyone else working on this project) so I urge you to ask the editors at WP:TEAHOUSE any questions you have.  Julietdeltalima   (talk) '' 16:35, 22 March 2019 (UTC)