User talk:Isabel de pablo

Reply to the Editors Stars methodology
I have previously posted on the discussion page that I am user of the Stars Methodology and find it serious topic of Wikipedia that readers should be able to read about. I have no commercial relation with Han Van Loon and I am not acting as an agent on his behalf. So there is no conflict of interest under Wikipedia guidelines. I therefore consider this rapid deletion without posting a discussion item as vandalism. Further more the reference website makes it clear that users have open access to the methodology under the GNU free document license provision, and that people are using it in knowledge cafes and workshops and website visitors can freely download the various cafe outcomes. The page I have written does not only consist of external links but provides an overview content of the method. Furthermore I included reliable sources such as the American Society of Quality. Because the methodology is free under the GNU free document license and I have provided a high level of overview I believe that the claim of blatant advertising is totally unsubstantiated.

I therefore request that a senior editor reinstated this page. --Isabel de pablo (talk) 17:10, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Stars methodology
A tag has been placed on Stars methodology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BigDunc (talk) 18:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Your relationship to Han van Loon and his consulting business
You seem to have a keen interest in LC Consulting's STARS methodology. If you are Han van Loon, are an employee of LC Consulting, or have a business relationship with LC Consulting, it is unlikely that you can write articles without violating Conflict of interest or WP:SPAM.

What is your relationship with Han van Loon and LC Consulting? -- DanielPenfield (talk) 14:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

STARS methodology
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article STARS methodology, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of STARS methodology.

Speedy deletion of STARS methodology
A tag has been placed on STARS methodology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Beeblbrox (talk) 01:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Requests for rollback/Denied/March 2008. RFRBot (talk) 23:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)