User talk:Isabella Sillars

Hi. Wikipedia is not a place to advertise books (see WP:NOTADVERTISING). I have removed the book listing from Stanbury and from the Bronte family, but I have left it in place in other articles with a note stating that it is a fictionalised account, therefore cannot be 100% accurate, true and verifiable. If you have any questions, then I am watching this page. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 14:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Good afternoon, I understand about advertising, related to my new book 'Mr. Nicholls'. However, it is a book about Mr.Nicholls' contribution to Stanbury and has much original research in it, as well as the difficult courtship of Charlotte Bronte.  It also relates to victorian schooling.  Your addition to explain the fictional account is a bit ungrammatical.. you say 'romance OF Charlotte Bronte'.  It should read 'relationship with Charlotte Bronte'.  I had the publishers cut out the word 'romance' in the sub-title as it was far from romantic for him.
 * Point taken on the 'romance' description (I was saying his romance of her, if it can be called that). However, you say it is your book, which is advertising no matter what. There are dozens, probably hundreds of factual books about the Brontës, and none of those are listed in the Stanbury article. The fact that your book is a work of fiction, albeit with a historical narrative, excludes it from being applicable to an article about Stanbury which relies on fact. Wikipedia adheres to WP:NPOV, WP:VERIFY, WP:OR and WP:COI which you have broken in self-promotion. Wikipedia is not about you selling more books. The joy of all things (talk) 15:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

We have no objection to the hasty objections made regarding our entries - if these don't comply with any points within Wikipedia. The book is of original historical interest, hence we want to include it as a reference item. We do however object to ungrammatical editing being made ('romance of her')by a third party as this is a reflection upon the author. We'd be grateful for no more correspondence as our office is much occupied.