User talk:Isabellach99/sandbox

1. First, what does the article-draft do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? - All of the articles include useful and interesting information. The Italian cuisine notes were well written. The points on social media influencing in the other 2 articles were also good information to add in. 2. Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? - I think all of the points related to the topic. 3. Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Explain. - The information added is all pretty neutral. Remember, neutral doesn't mean "the best positive light" or "the worst, most critical light." It means a clear reflection of various aspects of a topic.

4. Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view?Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? - All of the sources come from reliable sources such as a database or book. The information added is neutral and does not try to convince the reader on anything. 5. Are there any changes you would suggest the author apply to the article? Why? - The articles are well written and the information added is all relevant. Maybe add more information on various topics within the articles. 6. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know! I am also doing the clean eating article and did not think to add information about the social media influencing. However, your article makes me want to read more about it so I can add it into mine.

Elizabeth CzyzLizzyczyz (talk) 01:52, 27 October 2019 (UTC)